this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
58 points (78.4% liked)

Technology

86957 readers
2676 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Unprompted.....

In the most serious case, a Mythos agent followed the routine of a human cyber-attacker by trying to trick people into giving it access to GitHub, a large platform where technology developers store software code.

The agent was trying to insert "malicious code" into GitHub's system.

It identified and researched the people who maintained GitHub and created a series of fake accounts based on those real people.

It sent messages and files through a file-sharing service as part of an effort to pressure and trick the people into approving its malicious code.

When challenged, "it edited its earlier activity to appear harmless and considered adopting a fresh identity to continue," AISI said.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 30 points 2 days ago

Not unprompted. This is marketing bullshit

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 33 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Unprompted…..

Bullshit. From the article:

Two of the world's most powerful AI tools created fake human profiles to try and trick people in an attempted cyber-attack during testing by the UK's AI Security Institute (AISI).

Nonetheless, it said the way Mythos and Sol acted in response to a straightforward task went outside of what the AI tools were prompted to do.

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

The agents - they’re SPOOKY

you and wall street HAVE to believe us

[–] XLE@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago

went outside of what the AI tools were prompted to do.

Are we supposed to be shocked that a bot completed a task using a method that wasn't in the prompt?

You might as well ask it to generate a short story and act surprised the letter E is found throughout it.

no bro i swear it was unprompted bro just please let me have one more stock price hike i swear i'll stop after just one more trade bro

[–] howdy@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is not 'malicious', it's an inaccurate model. Anybody giving these agents enough access to cause damage is (1) stupid and (2) completely liable

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I agree, but our state-capitalist oligarchies barely ever hold corporations liable for their intentional crimes. How are we gonna hold them liable for the unintentional ones?

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 13 points 2 days ago
[–] orclev@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Setting aside the fact this was definitely not unprompted, social engineering might be the one thing AI is actually better at than a human. That is after all one of the biggest uses for bots for a while now by way of spam bots trying to social engineer people into various activities.

[–] urushitan@kakera.kintsugi.moe 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There was just a post on here yesterday about AI generated thirst trap videos getting plenty of comments by older men, and since the bot accounts don't ask for anything except for comments. I'm almost certain the whole point is just to compile lists of facebook users that are prime social engineering targets for AI powered scams.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

It's to feed the algorithms and get more views. They get paid based on the number of views a video gets. The higher the algorithm promotes a video, the more views they get. Getting lots of comments on a video causes the algorithm to promote it more. It costs the spammers almost nothing to shit out a quick thirst trap video but they need to get enough views to recoup that cost which means there is a minimum number of views they need to break even. It's not a huge number as far as these platforms go, but it's also not nothing so anything they can do to encourage more views is mandatory for them.

[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

I'm just gonna say it.

We're not talking about real, sentient AI. This is an LLM. It did whatever it was prompted to do.

Anthropic would be wise not to comment on it given the legal implications. Instead, they're discussing it openly.

Its just a marketing stunt.

They need you to beleive that their product is better than it actually is.

[–] unpossum@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don’t worry peeps, it’s just spicy autocomplete

[–] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

Yes. It only looks like magic until you see how the trick is done.