this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2026
134 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2334 readers
459 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/56159234

Op-ed by Reza Hasmath, Professor in Political Science, University of Alberta, Canada.

On July 1, China brought into force its Law on Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress, converting a decade of Xi Jinping’s doctrine of “forging a strong sense of community for the Chinese nation” into binding law.

Most attention has gone to its domestic machinery: entrenching Mandarin over minority languages, unified state textbooks and “inter-embedded” neighbourhoods engineered to dilute concentrations of Uyghurs and Tibetans among the Han majority. In other words, this is an assimilationist project that’s already far advanced.

The provision that matters most to the world outside China is buried near the end. Article 63 declares that organizations and individuals outside Chinese territory who “undermine ethnic unity” or “create ethnic division” shall be pursued for legal liability.

The Chinese government is therefore asserting, in statute, that its authority follows its critics across oceans into other countries, including Canada, home to some of the world’s largest Chinese, Uyghur and Tibetan diaspora communities. The danger is not that the law reaches across borders. It is what it criminalizes, whom it targets and how it’s enforced.

...

The intimidation inherent in the new law already violates many domestic harassment and foreign interference laws in jurisdictions around the world. Prosecutors, here, should use them against the agents carrying out the coercion, not the exiles who are its victims.

Governments should shut the unlicensed “police stations,” and press Interpol to reject politically motivated notices aimed at diaspora activists.

Governments can also build dedicated channels for those targeted: a clear law enforcement contact, protective guidance for Chinese and minority diaspora communities and training for officers who could mistake transnational repression for an ordinary domestic dispute.

Finally, asylum systems should treat Article 63 as evidence: a statute in which China announces that diaspora advocacy invites retaliation is close to proof of persecution for those seeking to flee.

China has every right to legislate for its own territory and citizens. What it cannot legitimately do, however warmly it speaks of unity, is disregard borders. The task for all nations, Canada included, is to insist, in law and in practice, that borders still exist.

...

Web Archive link

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 36 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Explain to me how erasure of an ethic identity is not considered ethnic cleansing?

And when you realize you can't, then explain to me why I, as a citizen of another country, should uphold your law designed to ethnically cleanse your nation within my borders?

[–] cavitationfetishist01@quokk.au 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Because ethnic cleansing is a shitty euphemism designed by people who wanted an excuse for inaction, not a real thing.

Did you mean 'genocide'?

[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

When speaking to the oppressor, its best to do so in their language lest your intent be lost in translation or to a knee-jerk rejection based on the implications of a particular term.

The question was not directed to Australians nor to fellow travelers such as yourself, rather to the various operatives of the CCP that are likely monitoring this post.

They've yet to reply at the time of this writing... better hurry up Xinne the Pooh, my popcorn is getting cold.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 33 points 4 days ago

Inb4 the ml users start trying to tell me how this is actually very pro-democracy and the highest form of freedom

[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 35 points 4 days ago (21 children)

But I thought China was a bastion of free speech and other personal freedoms? By how a large portion of people on Lemmy behave you may believe it's a communist utopia.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Who said that China is free speech?

[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 34 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Pro China advocates will more so claim that any negative news about china is western fear mongering and incorrect. They won't ever say directly that China has free speech. They'll just dance around such subjects with nonsense endlessly and then call in all their buddies to downvote you to hell.

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

You can post a uncontroversial opinion in the wrong instance and go from 2-3 points to -8 with a paragraph telling you how wrong and stupid you are.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] not@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Mao already did. You mean you want to give the Lamas back their slaves?

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago

Jesus Christ get some help

[–] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 3 points 3 days ago

Koolaid table is that way

And this is why as a Chinese person I'm too scared to ever visit China. There's a nonzero chance I'd be detained for my online speech.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"in a bid to not be outdone by Israel"

Or the united states tax service

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

It's very funny that the article goes out of it's way to say like, "The West never does things like this" because it means y'all don't get to accuse me of "whataboutism."

The US literally asserts the jurisdiction to bomb any country on earth if a secret, unelected, totally unaccountable domestic court determinines the country is harboring "terrorists," a nebulus term which has now been expanded to mean anyone who doesn't like fascism or doesn't buy things from Israel. "Every western example rests on a defined wrong" is an absolutely insane sentence to write.

The West is just pissy because they want every opportunity to do exactly what the law is restricting: to promote ethnic divisions to create dissent and instability. It's a pretty standard playbook at this point, though if you live in the kind of delusions where "every Western example rests on a defined wrong" I suppose it's easy enough to ignore historical examples of that.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 4 days ago (6 children)

It's very funny that the article goes out of it's way to say like, "The West never does things like this" because it means y'all don't get to accuse me of "whataboutism."

This motherfucker using a whataboutism to explain how HIS whataboutism is immune from being pointed out 🙄🤦🏻

The US literally asserts the jurisdiction to bomb any country on earth if a secret, unelected, totally unaccountable domestic court determinines the country is harboring "terrorists," a nebulus term which has now been expanded to mean anyone who doesn't like fascism or doesn't buy things from Israel. "Every western example rests on a defined wrong" is an absolutely insane sentence to write.

Absolutely correct.

Still doesn't make the Chinese law just.

to promote ethnic divisions to create dissent and instability.

You know who worry about "dissent and instability" enough to make laws specifically against it?

Tyrants and nobody else.

Do you know which people applaud such laws in spite of not being amongst the powerful people they're designed to protect?

Tankies, fascists, and other idiots prone to cheer their own oppression. Nobody else.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 4 days ago (5 children)

How many of the people operating these unlicensed police stations have been charged and arrested with kidnapping or attempted kidnapping? The people working these are members of an organized crime outfit. They need to be treated as such. Yet whenever I hear of them being shut down, the thugs working them just seem to get deported.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

China will punish racism as a crime.

But at what cost?!?

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

being Uyghur is racist? that's probably the dumbest fucking thing you've ever said, and that's a high bar.

[–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well given that it's a thing you said and not a thing I said, the utter stupidity of it isn't surprising.

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

China will punish racism as a crime.

the article is about China suppressing ethnic minorities. not only did you not read the article, you fucking baboon, but China is literally enshrining racism into law, exactly the opposite of your attempt at a pithy comment. you aren't just campist filth, you're dumb as a fucking brick as well.

[–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

you're dumb as a fucking brick

That's fucking hilarious coming from someone uncritically accepting the US State Department's analysis of a law in an AES country.

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 3 points 3 days ago (6 children)

I'm surprised you know that word, considering you've never once thought critically about anything you've read online. not that I believe you've done much reading, mind. everything you know of theory, you read in your ML Matrix circlejerks. your first experience with working class solidarity is going to be when the mob tears you to pieces for being a jack-booted thug of whatever the closest fascist government LARPing as communist is to you. and it'll be good riddance, because the only good campists like yourself will ever do for the world is to leave it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] PotatoPie@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 days ago

These newsites are going manic over china all of a sudden

load more comments
view more: next ›