this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2026
351 points (97.3% liked)

People Twitter

10319 readers
959 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. If you replace the "x" at their site with xcancel (so it beomes xcancel.com), and you're not on mobile, it will save video. https://web.archive.org/save is another great option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
  7. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] g0d0fm15ch13f@lemmy.world 44 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Good luck on the dp"

Absolutely incredible

[–] FavouriteShapes@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

I think many people don't enjoy DP as much as they think they might, and I actually entered the comments just to see if anyone else was saying this, but no

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 41 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Doesn't seem like a difficult goal to achieve. The first one, I mean.

[–] gedfromgont@piefed.ca 35 points 2 weeks ago

Well there you go, set achievable goals for yourself. The challenge can come from a stretch goal, which I am sure she also had in mind.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If you want to trust the people involved, it’s a lot harder.

[–] vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 2 weeks ago

“No anal with randos” is a rule you learn pretty fast.

[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

More like 'thrust the people involved'.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If it was easy, I would have had some DP by now.

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The are apparently some clubs for activities, Craigslist, dating/hookup apps, and if all else fails you can walk around certain parts of town with a sandwich board.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Now I want to know what that sandwich board would look like. Would it be artistic and sexy or just use three words in an easy to read font?

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

I am thinking you wear ONLY the sandwich board

Hell, even just trying for the second one feels like DP sometimes.

[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, imagine aunt Mabel asking the classic "What you wanna do when you grow up?"

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I want to be steam trained.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

I can only guess it's some kind of doggy style...?

[–] NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

They're both admirable aspirations! And remember, if one doesn't work out, you can always try the other.

[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

In which order?

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 2 points 2 weeks ago

Wait like the penetrant or the life goal?

[–] MrSelfDestruct@piefed.zip 17 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Is that Violet08 Twitter handle?

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

Well, other women exist, and some of them get horny.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Haha it really is a similar tone.

In case anyone is really wondering: Stella Barey is the porn actress who later went on to launch Hidden, as an alternative to OnlyFans. No idea how that project is going, though.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2025/nov/07/stella-barey-hidden-porn-creators-onlyfans

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Onlyfans actually went through a bit of a phase were they actually considered banning pornography (because that wasn't actually the original intention of the site so when it became popular for that they weren't initially happy about it) but then they realized that was stupid.

[–] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Throwback to Tumblr

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What was the original intention?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 week ago

Basically patreon, but somehow it ended up with something else.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

People still think violet isn't a bit?

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's called suspension of disbelief

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kenny2999@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

In the fight for universal healthcare, taking care of two people at once is a nice head start.

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

This is the version of there’s two wolves inside you that fits me lol

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Half of lemmy is unironically like this.

They just shove it in without care or context, I hope homegrown has better XD

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Which? The dp announcement or commenting their hopes and dreams?

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The unasked for political whingeing, realized sexual achievement isn't very Lemmy XD

[–] FavouriteShapes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

To be fair Lemmy was created by communists, and I think it was partially created to have better spaces to discuss political ideas like communism in. But also: i totally agree.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

Sweetie, what was stopping you from buying two cucumbers?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Don't count your chickens before they hatch. It's hard enough to get two people to show up for sex, three is exponentially harder.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

It's exponentially easier if you're an attractive woman

[–] PuddleOfKittens@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Attractive" is making an assumption here. Thankfully, it's not a particularly important one.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago

You can google her, she's not physically unattractive at the very least.

[–] ddplf@szmer.info 1 points 2 weeks ago

Nah, she kinda mid ngl

spoiler... I am allowed to say that about a person whose career choice relies pretty much completely on aesthetical factors, right?

load more comments
view more: next ›