this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
130 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

87544 readers
3540 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gedfromgont@piefed.ca 79 points 3 weeks ago
[–] testaccount372920@piefed.zip 77 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The way I read that title: Apple and Samsung stopped innovating, now sales aren't growing, so it's time for enshittification.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Samsung added a 10x telephoto lens and i was excited to finally get that over the regular 2x or 3x of the time.

Then they stopped making them and went back to 5x.

This phone still works great

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] eicker@lemmy.world 58 points 3 weeks ago

Subscriptions were supposed to replace cable, then software, then heated seats, now phones. Funny how every innovation somehow ends with paying forever. If your business model needs me renting hardware I already carry everywhere, maybe the product isn’t improving fast enough to justify buying it?

[–] RoddyStiggs@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

You should buy it. Every time. Fuck subscriptions.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Matth@sh.itjust.works 29 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

With smartphones current prices and componants becoming more expensive they are realizing not a lot of people will buy a smartphone costing more than 1500 dollars. Especially when hardware is now good enough and people are starting to try to keep their phone as long as possible.

Making you rent your phone allow to hide how much it's going to cost you and ensure them a steady cash income.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Master@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 weeks ago

Absolutely fucking not. Im not going to lease something that contains my private information ever.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I buy one smartphone per decade. Why would I want to lease it instead?

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Think of the recurring opportunity for emails about price increases and downstream shareholder value!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] smeg@infosec.pub 22 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

The only thing prompting phone replacement for me was battery life. And nearly all phones have shit ability to replace batteries (for now - EU rules incoming).

I bought a Fairphone 6 with /e/OS. I've left Big Tech behind. And I have a phone where I can easily replace the components. I don't want to swap devices for 4-5 years, which makes ownership far more cost effective than leasing.

Also -- with leasing, what happens when the renter is done with it? E waste, just like we have today.

[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Biggest issue is software support. You really do not want to run your banking app on an older, unpatched Android version

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Red_October@piefed.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

No, and also fuck off with that.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

If you cannot control the software on the device — including the OS — then you never bought it. You paid for it, but you did not buy it and therefore do not own it.

[–] Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Never do that. You should always fully own and control your communication and computation devices. It's a matter of privacy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Don't kid yourselves, the majority of people will eat this shit up

[–] PixTupy@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That's exactly what I thought. I know so many people that just want the newest release just because "status". Most of those people I know can't actually afford it, they just prioritise it over other things.

And most of them are tech illiterate and don't use 80% of the phone's abilities.

They will love this.

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Even without the FOMO, some people just want a working device.

It's why leasing cars is attractive to some. They don't care about the specs, they want one that works "well" and looks nice and are willing to give up nebulous "ownership"of a device that they don't know or care how it works, that they can't repair, so they can stop thinking about their choice and just always have a one available.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

You will own nothing and like it

[–] ragas@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

I waited 8 year to get a newer phoner that was better than my previous phone in all respects at the same price. And even then it was mostly a convenience upgrade because my old phone was still working well.

Why the hell would it be worth it to lease a phone?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] raman_klogius@ani.social 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Not beating the WEF's "you will own nothing and you'll be happy" conspiracy aren't they

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

I will go without. I will drag a PC and a mobile router everywhere I go before I rent a phone. Can these asshole corporate bullshitters just go to mars already so we can be free of them?

[–] PineRune@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Maybe we just need more affordable phones.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There were lots of affordable phones before the AI companies bought up all of the RAM and flash.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

I wrote this comment on a $150 phone which for all the purposes that I use it for, performs exactly as well as an $800 iPhone.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

An important thing to note here is that this isn’t anything new. This is what a significant amount of people have already been doing for years through their carrier. I don’t have any statistics on hand for this, but I personally don’t know a single person who has bought their phone outright. Everyone just leases their phone through their carrier around here, and upgrades as soon as they’re allowed. Hearing people complain about their cellphone plan cost increasing or poor cell service but being unable to switch carriers until their phone is paid off is a common thing to hear, as carriers have been using their phone leasing programs as a substitute for plan contracts for awhile now.

Leasing your phone through your carrier with the ability to buy or turn it in at the end of the term has been the name of the game for a very long time. What Apple and Samsung are doing is just trying to entice you into going direct through them instead of your carrier which is actually a good thing.

If you’ve been buying your phone outright then you shouldn’t use a program like this, but if you’ve been leasing your phone through your carrier I’d actually recommend switching to just doing the same thing directly through the manufacturer since it frees you up to switch carriers whenever you want.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I only buy hardware which supports installing free/libre operating systems and applications.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I will not rent critical items.

There has been a large push to enter a subscription for eyeglasses, the large firms here keep pushing and pushing to rent glasses.

Fuck no, I refuse to have my eyesight be dependent on having to keep paying.

Same for music, I buy all my music through iTunes, I have never used Spotify, I refuse to be put in a situation where I am in financial trouble and I loose access to my music.

This is the same crap, I need a phone to be an active member of modern society, I will not rent that access.

[–] michaelalf@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Wait, sorry, a subscription for GLASSES!? They're like $150 here if you want the name-brand ones, or covered by insurance if you don't. Insurance is basic btw, $80 a month for a family of 4 for 'basic extras'. I don't know which country you live in, but I can take a wild guess.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago

“The intent is that the user will turn in their device every 12 to 36 months because they intend to upgrade regardless.”

No, I get a new device because I've broken the last one. The ones I give back, you can't sell on the secondary market which is their intent.

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

used unlocked phone market has been my go to for decades

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So they're coming to terms that nobody wants to buy what is basically the same kind of phone now a days for higher price... and so now they want to scam people by "upgrading" to what they think will be cheaper when in reality, it's probably not...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

All companies see there are more profits to be made if you let consumers pay your company monthly instead of once, while you do not let them own anything. It is disgusting.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Initially I used to only buy new phones when my phone became too slow - roughly every 6-7 years. Now I get refurbished or get it from someone else for free and replace the battery. My current phone is from 2018 and still works well. Why would I replace it?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

They want a future in which only they own property, and everyone else has to rent even the freaking air.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Last phone was an iPhone 13. Current is the 17.

I don’t game so unless something catastrophic happens I don’t see myself needing to get a new phone for a very long time.

I have no interest running “AI”, either.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 7 points 3 weeks ago

Or, maybe their CEOs can stick them in their asses.

[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Let's be honest here: A smartphone costs the same to develop, produce and so on, regardless of if you simply buy it or rent it. The companies need their profit, so they will not start renting you a phone when it is more profitable to sell it to you. It should make you suspicious that they want you to rent, because that kind of tells you that they will make more profit from renting than selling. That means that you will pay more for your phone in the long run without owning it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 weeks ago

Apple, Samsung, and any OEMs leaning on this can get fucked.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Serious question: How is subsiding a phone over three years and then trading it in at the end of those three years to get another phone any different from leasing ?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 weeks ago

Those big corps sure lust after subscriptions. Damn those old paper magazines for giving them yet another unoriginal idea!

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago

No. The only innovations these days are AI. If you don’t care about that, you’ll be fine with whatever.

My iPhone is pretty current from 2024, but my Android phone from 2019 isn’t much slower or less capable. It has less storage, but it has a memory card slot. There isn’t much it can’t do that the newer iPhone can, except for generate AI slop on device.

If you need AI, they’re gonna make you pay to play. If you don’t… just chill.

[–] randombullet@programming.dev 5 points 3 weeks ago

Didn't Google used to have Pixel Pass where you get a new phone every 2 years? Then they killed it before the 2 year cycle was up?

Imaging companies promising you a new phone after 2 years and then canceling the program at 22 months and then said oops, here $50 store credit...

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm sure carriers still do payment plans

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dsilverz@catodon.rocks 5 points 3 weeks ago

Rent your phone so you can rent an app that'll allow you to access your internet banking and pay for all the rents, including the rental of payment services for rental paying?

No, thanks, I'll cut through this whole Rube-Goldberg machinery of "living in society", straight into applying for a leasing for my next six-feet-under wooden house instead. I'd love the view, grass and chrysanthema at my roof, buzzards as my faithful company (whether it'll be part of the legalese leasing terms or not, Mother Nature doesn't care about that, and neither do I as I'd be long gone (or should I say, long bones) at that point).

!technology@lemmy.world

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Lease your phone so that you have enough money to finance a pizza.

“YOU OWN NOTHING!!”

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›