this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2026
257 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

87507 readers
4793 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 75 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

and take the economy with it...

Yeah like the last umpteen times this has happened in my lifetime. We live in a society of greed, who knew it would be so unstable?

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But this hype is real. Promise! Really real! Or the next one!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 69 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

If that's the thing that kills the economy, the economy deserves to be killed

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 34 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Which economy? The billionaire economy of the normies economy?

[–] SolacefromSilence@fedia.io 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

First one, then the other because it's only fair

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

ah, because the billionaires are going to suck the blood from the regular economy like a vampire to recover

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago

Recover? No they buy low and double their take (or 100x or whatever the ratio is at this point).

We’re doing trillionaires now don’t forget. Even though Elon might not be anymore, there will be others unless we get our act together.

[–] Atropos@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

We will follow the billionaires into it economic hell. In solidarity of course.

Fuck, I wish we had a choice in this.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 42 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, like we haven't been through multiple "generational" recessions.

At this point I feel like I've spent more time alive during recessions than not, so what's one more for the pile - especially if it means getting to watch the AI bros go bankrupt.

[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 11 points 3 weeks ago

Saddle up, sea biscuit

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

It has always been either the economy crashing because the AI bubble pops, or the economy crashes because the bubble didn't pop due to AI successfully replacing enormous numbers of workers.

[–] Thorry@feddit.org 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Or the economy crashes by AI replacing everyone and doing an absolute terrible job, causing stuff like supply chain collapse and communication/power outages.

I have yet to see someone explain how this whole thing actually works out. Just a dozen different scenarios that turn out terrible for almost everyone. The only scenario that works out is if a handful of people like Altman absolutely rule the world, become de facto dictators as they are the ones that control the few AI companies that run everything. And by work out, I mean it works out for that handful of people. For the rest of the world it's probably just about the worst case scenario. But you just know it's the scenario scammy Altman is hoping for.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] EntheoNaut@lemmy.ml 19 points 3 weeks ago

Let the dominoes fall.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

The stability of our economy depends on them quickly changing course.

Oh. Well.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 18 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Not could. It's a mathematical certainty that it will. Barring a breakthrough miracle -- fat chance.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

One day we shall reclaim the sullied em dash for ourselves once and for all!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I wonder if we will be able to get GPUs and RAM for reasonable prices afterwards.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Danitos@reddthat.com 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I think that's kind of their idea. Be unsustainable and unprofitable, yet push to be on everything so the Goverment will bail them out.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The current everything bubble is too big to be bailed out. It will take down with it everything. Including the value of currency.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

If this one bursting ends the USD status as Reserve Currency, that would be great.

Painful, but in the mid and long term great.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Too big to fail...again...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 weeks ago

That’s the point. AI was never meant to succeed. It’s a ransom. They are willing to kill the hostages so to speak.

[–] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I don't have any money. Crash away. Fuck it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

World War 3 will keep it going!

[–] schmorpel@slrpnk.net 13 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

I've heard World War 3 sucks. Can't wait for World War 4, hope they finally get all the bugs sorted out.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

It would be so funny that the economy crashes, making poor people poorer and rich people richer!

Because that is what happened in the past few crashes. So I'm not entirely sure when and where I should start laughing about this

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Doorbook@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I can burst it quick if I invest in Nvidia and AMD.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

AMD is an industry leader with a huge economic moat and I think they will be okay when the bubble pops. I'm not sure about Nvidia though, despite having superb chips, because the problem is they loaned to companies to buy their chips. So, Nvidia's finances will be strained because Jensen Huang created a ponzi scheme that could not repay or be profitable to itself.

[–] cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Not really a ponzi, more like circular financing. Nvidia exposed itself to the AI bust for no reason other than to keep the money flowing to buy their chips for a little longer. They were selling shovels in a gold rush and screwed it up by letting people finance the shovels. They're not in the finance business, they're in the chip business.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The economy has not been good since the 70's and I wish economists would collectively pull their heads out of their asses and stop towing the line of the ones in charge.

What you or I experience is completely decoupled from the stock market, or the GDP, and has been forever.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dbtng@eviltoast.org 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sigh. Guess I'm gonna go read Ed Zitron's latest rant.
Haven't read it yet, no idea what he's on about today, but here's the link.
https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-more-you-buy-the-more-you-lose/

[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Two years ago, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang said that “the more you buy, the more you save,”

Well, two years ago he was kind of right. But not in the way he meant it. But I should have bought 64gb instead of 32gb RAM when I built my gaming system

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RiceBowl@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I’ve put all my money in pogs so I should be ok.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

Uhh, bottle caps are the future.

load more comments (8 replies)

Yeah wow hey maybe you should have fucking listened to everyone who’s been saying that for goddamn YEARS. 🫩

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 7 points 3 weeks ago
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Listen, I work IT at a managed service provider, which means I see a dozen + small to medium business environments daily.

The number of users that I know of, out of the hundreds or thousands that I support, who are actively using "AI" continually to do their jobs... Well, I can likely count them on one hand

There's a bunch that use whatever free tool they are allowed to access. Which kind of flies under the radar for me, but I still don't think you're dealing with double-digit percentages of people using "AI" that actually spend any money on it.

And these are business users, who work at businesses with rather deep pockets at times....

People are not buying the product. "AI" in the business world, isn't making any money. So from what I've seen, this is less a matter of if, and more a matter of when and how bad.

As a tech person, I am not threatened by AI. It can't do my job. Also, I'm the one who fixes it when things go wrong. And the only thing I'm looking forward to is being able to pick up cheap RAM, and storage when this all comes crashing down as AI companies cash out and liquidate their inventory. Maybe I can pick up a cheap AI server and repurpose it to be a 3D/gaming virtual desktop, so when my friends come over with their cheap laptops and on board graphics for a LAN party, I can just provision them a virtual gaming computer and we can go ham.....

I'm going to save my sheckles until then...

I have limited experience with the market but I see it this way: anyone with AI holdings should liquidate at their earliest convenience. I don't think they'll be keeping up this charade for a lot longer. Anyone who has tech holdings, either cash out, or be prepared to have that money held up for a while because it will take a long time for the prices to recover, and unless you want to cash out at a loss, you're going to be holding for a long time. Everyone else, hold onto your butts. Probably everything will probably dip when the fecal matter hits the rotary air movement device. Non tech areas of the market should recover pretty quickly, so meh?

This is obvious to me that the whole thing has failed. That realization hasn't hit execs yet.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, ehm... Worldwide or "just" the US economy who build up on this shit the last year or so?

Not sure how the follow up impact will be on other countries, but first of, the US will be fucked

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

When you got nothing, you got nothing to lose.

Bob Dylan

load more comments (5 replies)

So the top 7 companies hedged their entire futures on something unsustainable? In the last 12 months Oracle already laid off over 50,000 employees to bottom-line their AI goals (30,000 ish and 21,000ish a couple weeks ago).

[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

economy of paid subscriptions needs to die. ☑️

I agree, I deleted almost every app that has a subscription

If the apps have a pay once and buy once option then I keep and don’t delete

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

Please do. I'm tired of reading PKD novels, they're more fun happening IRL.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Ah, the weekly post with this title.

"Congress could legalize weed!" Yeah, but it don't.

load more comments
view more: next ›