this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
797 points (97.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

11893 readers
2161 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

The guy is pursuing a patent for it, so I'm not sure other people can use it XD

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

This example is imperfect because you also need to mix the dry ingredients together before the folding in. I know that but it looks like this chart assumes everyone knows it. But the idea is sound. I like it.

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Im mgl, I actually cant decipher op super easily

[–] mattreb@feddit.it 2 points 9 hours ago

...and this table would still work, since you could write this in that empty square at the bottom!

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 7 points 14 hours ago

Oh great. Now I want to lay out all my own recipes like this.

... I have too many projects already. XD

[–] RecursiveParadox@piefed.social 18 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

If you are tired of reading of grandma's hardships in the great depression here is a trick:

Add "cooked.wiki/" (without the "") to the beginning of any recipe URL, and it will strip away everything but a column with the ingredients and a column with the recipe.

You have to make an account to store recipes, but that's totally optional.

[–] LandBasedDaveyJones@lemmy.today 1 points 9 hours ago

Someone mentioned an app for this, there's also one called Paprika 3 that does something similar. This one you don't need an account to store recipes though. It can also translate weight to imperial measurements, and solve ingredient quantities for portions like 1/2, etc.

Also generally you can hit the in-page "print" button and the print version is often a one-sheet that cuts out the "my family xyz" bs. To be fair, some of those have real tips or hints or substitutions they don't include in the recipe proper, but a lot of the time it's just fluff as you can't copyright recipes without significant extra steps and exposition.

[–] IjonTichy@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

For Android there's also this: https://f-droid.org/packages/com.flauschcode.broccoli/

Does the same on your phone just share a link to the app.

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 2 points 15 hours ago

Is there a way of calling on the mods to pin this, cause that's useful as hell

[–] kayohtie@pawb.social 1 points 14 hours ago

Ah yes, recipes for people who think "what do you mean you can't cook, the recipe is right there."

Usually because they've never examined why people don't rave about their pie crusts or cake texture.

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Hucking fell. Ima just download it to remember this exists. Thank you

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 48 points 1 day ago

Here's an open source library for generating these from markdown https://mossblaser.github.io/recipe_grid/tutorial.html

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 45 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But where am I going to put the six paragraph AI generated anecdote about my grandmother?

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In white text on white background at the bottom of the page where the rest of the SEO goes.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You know, I don't hate this.

Let's simplify websites significantly. Everything SEO/AI slop appears below the fold in white text.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't know, what's a recipe without a popup video and six banners and a "jump to recipe" button that doesn't work, as well as 99 pictures of spaghetti?

[–] Brickhead92@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This recipe is missing something. Maybe throw in a backstory.

[–] Felis_Catus_Domesticus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Eggs from gay chickens and vanilla from gender-fluid vanilla plants.

[–] mig@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

Vanilla orchids are not gender fluid at all, they are hermaphroditic. And eggs from happy hens just taste better.

[–] bullsworth@pawb.social 124 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Annoying that they did not even mention the original site: https://www.cookingforengineers.com/

Which does seem down right now, so archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20260729050049/https://www.cookingforengineers.com/

[–] WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de 73 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The site being down fits with the ‘for engineers’ theme

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 2 points 19 hours ago

Joking aside, it was down because it got Reddit hugged to death, since a post on the frontpage of /r/all mentioned it in the top comment.

Now it's back online

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] DudeWhoYapsTooMuch@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Because normal people are idiots. They are not going to understand any of this whatsoever. That's why you have to put the actual instructions with the ingredients.

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 83 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Where's the box for the story about how mother used to make this years ago and how the author made it for a such and such party and guests were asking for the recipe and ...

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I want to read the authors complete backstory and several holiday pictures and sales pitches on why I should buy their artisanal ingredients, scrolling until I nearly give up.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The hallmark of recipe design imo was modernist cuisine and the following books on pizza and bread. A lot of the recipes were obnoxious and it’s written by a notorious ex Microsoft cto that turned into a patent troll to finance his cooking nerd bullshit (morally justifiable to pirate all of the obnoxiously expensive books) but props for their recipe format

Very clear, in order of addition, scaling percentages, and in the actual book clear instructions follow which is extremely helpful in the bread one especially

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 15 hours ago

I have Julia Child's Mastering the Art of French Cooking, and I believe its written in the same way...

okay it is a little different, because there is no % or weight measurements, but it is in order similar, with similar instruction style, printed 1970.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Either I cant calculate or the percentages don't add up.
What is up wuth the two 100%?

[–] LePoisson@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 21 hours ago

Would’ve probably been helpful to add that, whoops. But once you understand it it makes scaling a recipe much easier. This is less important for stuff like Mac and cheese tbf, but if you go to the bread or pizza book the ratios are much more important

[–] testaccount789@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago

That recipe design reminds me I should learn LaTeX, but I am also lazy, so...

[–] Leviathan@fedinsfw.app 2 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

What if you wanted to first sift, combine and whisk the dry ingredients before folding in, would you put that in the big blank square box?

[–] VAK@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago
[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You add an other column and put the ingredients you use first at the top.

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I feel like itd be easier to just put a mix block next to those directly below the one for the wet ingredients, keep the fold box to the side, and add bake as a wide one beneath it all like preheat is at the top

[–] Pencilnoob@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

COOKING FOR ENGINEERS!!!

I learned how to cook from this site like 20 years ago! I still use that format on my home recipe cards sometimes, but now I've just gotten so used to it all recipes look like this on my head. Great format, taters guna tate. I also

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Works for some recipes, but not all.

Also, more detailed instructions are needed. Mix for how long, till what consistency? Baking times and temps usually also say something like "... or until just brown", or "...until crispy with dark edges." Because, unlike machines with switches that do exactly the same thing each time, cooking has many variables that simple instructions don't account for.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (17 children)

I believe this design breaks down once you prepare an ingredient that then gets split for use in two or more later steps.

But now I'm thinking which kind of diagram could be used as well. Some adaption of an UML activity diagram maybe?

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Felis_Catus_Domesticus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

anything can be Marie Kondo'ed, it would seem.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Needs a four chapter novel about something unrelated in front of it.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You should probably mix together the dry ingredients before folding them in. So the big blank square in the bottom middle should be "mix" but I guess that ruins the cascading aesthetic and makes it more cluttered, which would've also showed the weakness of this design

Also why would you fold in the dry ingredients, maybe this is just some "lorem ipsum" recipe but unless there's a foam you're trying to keep inflated you don't really need to fold stuff in.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›