this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
96 points (90.7% liked)

Technology

86701 readers
3788 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Supposedly the change of heart came after "the first security incident that I have felt very viscerally," the Huggingface escape. To me it sounds like he's worried about the competition breathing down his neck and wants someone to come in and call a time-out.

all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Way to get ahead of the slowdown Sam. Control the narrative. You "chose" to scale back.

"Actually we almost made the A.I. too good and it scared me cuz of how good it was"

[–] Kaligalis@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

He can do what he wants - except closing Pandora's box. It stays open. The race is on, whether he participates or not.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

Nvidia is backing the wrong horse

[–] SouthFresh@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You can tell when Altman is lying by noticing that his mouth is open.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago

Sufficient but unnecessary imo.

Sometimes he lies in print, tbd whether he talks out the words when he types.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 12 hours ago

LOL...those graphs didn't infinitely extrapolate Sam?

99% of failed companies are from graph extrapolation in board rooms.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Why do we care that some greedy bastard is doing a fake apology tour?

[–] artifex@piefed.social 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Because he’s a greedy bastard with the ear of every head of state, standing at the top of a $1.6T pyramid scheme we’re all tangled up in.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 14 hours ago

We gotta stop worshipping these guys because they have power's ear. The people are way, way more important than lil' sammy whatsisname?

[–] Slashme@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I've just been reading the Wikipedia article about the huggingface intrusion, and it reminds me strongly of the descriptions of hacking in Neuromancer.

[–] artifex@piefed.social 4 points 14 hours ago

Thats why there are no smart locks in my house. Deadbolts and keys only.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 30 points 23 hours ago

Company can't keep up with competitors, claims it is for altruism

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 hours ago
[–] renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net 114 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Every "Sam Altman said..." headline can be summed up as:

"Manipulative liar says whatever he thinks his audience wants to hear."

[–] MadPsyentist@lemmy.nz 22 points 1 day ago

"Tech crypto grifter says thing to grift people with crypto, tech or both. More at 11"

Although i cant imagin any sign of a pullback would be good for any of the companies in the AI bubble. While probably not important on the specifics of what he is saying it is a "we should slow down" which the market aint gonna like. No breaks on this gravy train Sammy boy!

[–] ptsdstillinmymind@lemmy.today 0 points 11 hours ago

He is just like Elon Musk a tech bro con man that has the backing of some of the richest companies and people in the world.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

He should accelerate himself off a cliff.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sam is a con man, why is anyone listening to him.

[–] mPony@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

because of near-constant media stories like this one

[–] meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Likely translation: scaling their models is hitting diminishing returns, while the business world is slowly realizing the math ain't mathing and they're not suddenly 10x more efficient and profitable than before LLM adoption.

So Sammy and the others need a plausible cover story why capabilities aren't evolving at break neck speed anymore, to prevent their beautiful bubbly bubble from crashing down on them

[–] artifex@piefed.social 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Let's hope they get the Enron treatment for their actions

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm thinking more French revolution treatment.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago

Sweet! Who are you hoping the next Napoleon will be?

[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Feds made them be the fall guy though. Data centers are new infrastructure for the government to use. That's the main reason for all this ai bullshit. Chapgpt and this consumer grade bullshit is the unplugged video game controller they gave us to makes us feel special and a part of something while THEY play "The Game".

An expansion of the above; https://reddthat.com/comment/28125951

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 1 points 15 hours ago

while THEY play "The Game"

And I just lost it.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

Sadly it's way more banal and boring than that.

Exactly. Who tf actually believes this crap?

[–] borokov@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Meanwhile, me still using GPT 4 as: "Rephrase: " CTRL+v

[–] ape_arms@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's difficult to think of a more punchable face than Sam Altman's.

[–] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I dunno, Dario Amodei’s face is my personal choice.

[–] ape_arms@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Well, you got me there.

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

my vote for punchable face is Jeff Bezos

[–] Escape13@slrpnk.net 2 points 11 hours ago

There’s also one rich asshole called Larry Ellis

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He wants regulations to kill the competition. Open source is gonna get fucked in the coming months. The whole media campaign has been specifically for this.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 2 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Sorry if this is a dumb question but I keep seeing open source and open weight when talking about LLMs. Are these two terms interchangeable? If not, what do they mean and which is correct?

[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

Open weight is like getting a compiled binary with no source code. Without the training data and pipeline code, once the original developer stops releasing new versions, it’ll be difficult for the community to pick up and keep going.

For example, if Alibaba decides to only release trillion parameter models from now on, Qwen 3.6 may be the most intelligent Qwen model that will ever run on consumer hardware.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

They mostly are interchangeable for most people but almost none of the llm weights are properly open source.

They don't always give the training scripts and never the actual data so it isn't reproducible. The data isn't really feasible to give. A lot of them release papers at the same time where they explain the training with snippets and how it works, but it's not the same as receiving a script.

That being said, some get really upset and stress the distinction but it's a bit silly imo. If it's free and easily fine tunable, I don't really see the issue of calling it open source. Giving the data for it would open them up to lawsuits from the copyright mafia and wouldn't bring much to the table. Training these models is completely out of reach for individual and small to medium sized organisations.

Training a small model was more than a million dollars in compute a year or two ago.

[–] Miller@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] artifex@piefed.social 15 points 1 day ago

Yeah, we've definitely been seeing diminishing returns with the latest frontier models. I think that's why when GLM and Kimi come in at 1/5 the price of Opus but are just as good, or when Deepseek comes in at 1/10 the price and is catching up quickly, they have to worry. There may be nowhere for them to go.

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I'd like to hit his head against a wall, multiple times.

[–] scytale@piefed.zip 13 points 1 day ago

We need to scale AI development!

Openweight models start growing

No, not like that!

[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 18 points 1 day ago

Stop paying attention to this lying fuckwad.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No he isn't, the only reason Sam Altman would hit the breaks is if he was falling behind and needed to catch up.