this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2026
361 points (97.6% liked)

Programming

28256 readers
363 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Would be a terrible shame if lots of people opted out.

If you are a EU citizen you might also want to write a complaint to privacy@huggingface.co because they are collecting your personally identifiable information in machine-readable form which they are distributing to third parties.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 137 points 1 month ago (17 children)

We want to give developers agency over their source code by letting them decide whether or not it should be used to develop and evaluate machine learning models.

fuck them seriously; if you want to do that then don't steal the repositories in the first place.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 98 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Meanwhile at work we just had a training course that specifically said doing “opt out” instead of “opt in” violates the principle of informed consent.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 month ago

Notice how a shit load of these people keep turning up to be rapists and pedophiles… They have no shits to give about informed consent. In their mind you don’t even have the right to the same agency they do.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago

not surprising since the venn diagram of ai bros and rapists is a circle.

[–] lps2@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Kinda hope it uses my code. It's so terrible there's no doubt it will make the resulting code from the model worse even if the impact is miniscule

[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago

I just opted out of all my repos except the God awful ones from middle and highschool. Those are basically prompt poison so fuckem

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 month ago

Modern tech companies love using the rapsist's model of consent.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] gedfromgont@piefed.ca 79 points 1 month ago (24 children)

I never really needed any justification, but ever since AI companies just take stuff illegally, and that openly, it has become my justification to just pirate the shit out of everything.

(Excluding indie games of developers I like).

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] abacabadabacaba@infosec.pub 75 points 1 month ago (4 children)

The best way to opt out is by not using GitHub. Also opts you out of Copilot and a bunch of other stuff.

[–] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 1 month ago

Already did that some time ago but I am still in the dataset.

[–] fruitcantfly@programming.dev 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Other git hosts are also getting scraped, and have had to implement counters because of it. For example, this is the kind of thing Codeberg shows crawlers. I've even seen people who self-host complaining about getting overloaded because of bots scraping their forge

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

note that former users would have needed to remove their GitHub data before August 2025 to not be in this dataset

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 60 points 1 month ago (10 children)

A decade ago, if someone asked someone working on an Open Source project if they'd be ok with an AI reading their code and learning from it, they'd most likely say "yeah that sounds really cool!"

Somehow the tech-bros have fucked up AI so much that something that should be really cool seems creepy, lame, and nefarious all at once.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] diabetic_porcupine@lemmy.world 57 points 1 month ago (3 children)

lol my first ever JavaScript project is in the stack. No wonder their models suck so much ass

[–] f3nyx@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

my commits are the reason we haven't achieved AGI

[–] Bababasti@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thank you for your service 🫡 please keep committing trash code

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 month ago

A little bit infuriating since huggingface itself requires login to access a large portion of the content on their site

[–] Kissaki@programming.dev 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

We want to give developers agency over their source code by letting them decide whether or not it should be used to develop and evaluate machine learning models.

crawled directly from GitHub and built to pre-train code LLMs with full-repository context

Repositories that opted out are removed from the dataset before each patch release.

"agency"

Which AI company will not use v1 which has all of the data but will use later patch releases instead which have less data?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (5 children)

if I opt out, will the Roko's basilisk come after me?

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Reported for cognitohazard. Delete this immediately.

(I kid, but someone really did report your comment.)

[–] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 month ago

I think its hilarious that some people seem to actually take this science fiction variation on Pascal's wager seriously.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

When I hear this company's name I can't get the idea out of my head that it's related to the face huggers from Alien.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Wonder how many of those repos contain AI-generated code?

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Much like... -reads notes- Microsoft is via Github... huh....

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] goatbeard@beehaw.org 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Since they stole my paper on ethics in computer science, maybe the model will learn to act better than its owners

[–] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Am I alone in not wanting to put my username into that field? If they don't have it will they then just decide that it's now a good time to scrape it? Or are they going to record that it was searched?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] qaz@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I just followed the opt out link and they're making you open a public issue with a Markdown list with all your repositories you want removed.

Surely there has to be a better way to do this (probably the point).

Also why are they storing 4.71 TB in a Git repo? How are they going to deal with removal requests?

EDIT: It seems like they're manually responding to the issues, wtf? There's a perfectly fine GitHub auth system that they could use to verify everyone's GitHub account / repository ownership

EDIT 2: This is apperently a collaboration between Hugging Face and ServiceNow, why is my companies IT ticketing system scraping all of GitHub?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] G_M0N3Y_2503@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Pretty sure all my repos are MIT licensed for the betterment of everyone, but I'm not on the list! So I guess I'm not good enough, or they are failing to follow the attribution clause of it.

[–] Jestzer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Strange because all of my MIT repos are listed - all the GPL ones are excluded.

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Mine are all GPLv3 or forks of other repos and they are listed. I'm sanguine because the license allows for study and if it's good enough for humans I don't see why it's not for clankers.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 6 points 1 month ago

My dotfile repo is there and it doesn't have a licence. Meaning it's technically not open source. Didn't stop them

[–] Swuden@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

They’re not able to scrape private repos, surely?

[–] okamiueru@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Microsoft has access, and everything is for sale. So, maybe? Probably? 🤷

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.today 6 points 1 month ago (10 children)

tbh i'm thinking this alone isn't that bad from an archiver/datahoarder perspective

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

As long as the datasets are open, it is our best hope. I know it doesn't compensate the people whose work's copyright and licenses have been violated, but I think it's the only realistic hope we've got of getting out of this informational dystopia with a reasonably intact library of humanity's knowledge that hasn't been locked down and/or monetized. The AI scrapers and generators are in the process of burning down the great library of Alexandria that the Internet had become, and we are already starting to feel its loss. We cannot stop the wave of toxic pollution that is spreading through all our digital content now, but the archives from before this apocalypse started will become the most valuable thing humanity has ever produced. This is information war, and we are losing.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] jbrains@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Good thing I never finished a project!

load more comments
view more: next ›