this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
59 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

7762 readers
619 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Experts warn increase in enhanced photos on birding platforms creating fake sightings, threatening credibility of tool used by scientists

For many birdwatchers, recording a species outside its normal range is the holy grail. In the UK, the discoveries often make national headlines. The western reef heron, for example, usually found in Africa and southern Europe, was spotted in a seaside town in north Wales in June, and widely celebrated on birding forums.

But a new scourge is threatening to disrupt the fun: AI slop.

Scientists are appealing to birders to limit their use of AI when editing images over fears that it could undermine the credibility of popular citizen science platforms such as iNaturalist and Macaulay Library, which are routinely used in scientific research to monitor species’ habitat range.

[…]

Lees points to the example of a false sighting of a red-winged blackbird in central Brazil, which is usually found in North America and had never been seen in this area of Brazil until the reported sighting. The bird was, in fact, an epaulet oriole – a common new world bird species – but the photographer had asked an AI platform to make the picture “look better”, which is when parts of the red-winged blackbird were added, resulting in the false sighting.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 7 points 1 week ago

Bro just post the picture you actually took, that represents the experience you actually had. I don't really understand the way it feels like many relate to photos. It feels like many people want the photo to be better than the actual experience, rather than something that represents the experience even if the photo is flawed

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago

Another case of good intentions (providing higher quality pictures) led astray by the deception and hype surrounding this technology. I somehow find it more heartbreaking to see well-meaning people fall for the bullshit than all the malicious executives looking to save money.