this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
268 points (99.6% liked)

politics

31051 readers
2068 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] artyom@piefed.social 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The complaint asks the Texas secretary of state to examine whether Paxton committed election fraud

Texas SoS is a Republican appointed by Greg Abbott so don't hold your breath.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Seriously, the only hope here is that Abbot is fed up with Paxton and ready to throw him under the bus, and that hope is so unlikely it borders on hallucination.

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

yeah but if he gets elected to federal office he’s out of hot wheels’ hair

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He literally admitted on camera in an interview with Steve Bannon that he threw away 2.5 million votes in the 2020 election, and that Biden would have won Texas if he had not done that.

[–] uss_entrepreneur@startrek.website 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fuck Paxton , But that’s not what happened. He blocked 2.4 million mail in ballot applications from being sent. Hes still a piece of shit though and I hope talarico beats the hell out of him.

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The link you gave confirms what I said, but their conclusion is that it was incorrect, which is a bit... weird.

A lawsuit and state Supreme Court ruling that specifically causes voter disenfranchisement by throwing away 2.5 (or 2.4) million votes or voter registration roles has the exact same effect as what I said.

[–] diverging@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He didn't throw away 2.4 million votes. Harris county (voter population: 2.4 million) wanted to expand voting options, Paxton prevented that, as in the mail-in ballots were never sent out.

1.6 million people in Harris county still voted in the 2020 election. That's a voter turnout of 68.14%. The state of Texas had a voter turnout of 60.8%.

Then I stand corrected. It is still voter disenfranchisement, though, especially during COVID.

[–] Master167@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

It's Ken Paxton. A crime was probably committed. But no R-pilled bureaucratic Rexas is gonna do squat about it in Texas.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If anyone has an R after their name, they probably need to be looked into. Lots of reasons. Treason. Corruption. Pedophilia.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

That's all. We don't need to go after their politics, as reprehensible as they are, their actual crimes will keep us plenty busy, we won't have any need to be making things up.

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I have never read a more naive and quaint headline about Ken Paxton