this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
445 points (98.9% liked)

Boycott US

2588 readers
36 users here now

Overview:

The community dedicated to boycotting the US until they stop fascism, restore full democracy and start following international law.

Americans have a moral obligation to resist Donald Trump and project 2025 at every turn.

America is a flawed democracy currently being ruled by oligarchs. Stop the backslide! Dont let America become the next Hungary.

America needs to challenge the court rulings of citizens united v. fec and shelby county v. holder, protect the media, implement independent district drawing, and the single transferable vote so they don't end up having people stay home in life-changing elections because they cannot vote for their favourite candidate.

Join 50501.chat to fight back!


Related communities:

Boycott:!buycanadian@lemmy.ca

!buyeuropean@feddit.uk

!boycott@lemmy.sdf.org

!boycottchina@sopuli.xyz

Activism:!antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world

!petitions@lemmy.ca

!palestine@lemmy.dbzer0.com

!protest@lemmy.world

!israelicrimes@lemmy.world

!patriotsforprogress@lemmy.ca

!goodsuniteus@lemmy.ca


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 136 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And by "freedom" he doesn't mean your freedom.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 15 points 3 weeks ago

Yes. Kant’s positive vs negative liberty applies; small gov advocates like Thiel tend to mean the latter.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 75 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

He's not entirely wrong. In a democracy we vote for people who (in an ideal world) would regulate assholes like him. In his fascist technocracy he'll be able to do whatever the fuck he wants to the rest of us. So in that sense, sure, democracy can put limits on ultimate freedom™©®

....but we kinda want that because fuckbags like thiel exist.

[–] snek_boi@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I like that you had the TM C and R.

What democracies do is create freedoms for everyone, true freedoms.

The freedom to choose one’s path of life? Sure! Democracies create that freedom through good, cheap, universal education!

The freedom to be as healthy as possible? Sure! Democracies create that freedom through good, cheap, universal healthcare!

The freedom to have technology help us solve problems? Sure! Democracies create that freedom through effective investments in research and development!

These are just a tase of what democracies do to create true freedom.

[–] hyperhopper@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

They don't do this inherently. What is happening in America shows that often people vote to restrict their own freedoms.

[–] yes_this_time@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

But that's being caused by anti democratic forces.

Democratic countries need to keep progressing.

Concentrated power isn't democratic, there needs to be an always on equalizer.

[–] snek_boi@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago

If we define democracy as voting, then you’re right. However, to understand what I’m saying it’s important to understand what I mean by democracy. I’m using democracy to mean inclusive institutions that invest in their citizens to increase their capabilities and therefore their freedoms.

And you’re right: America is exceptionally un-democratic. You’re actually doubly right: there are democratic backsliding pressures around the world.

It’s a matter of time to see what the more powerful pressures will be: democracy or authoritarian populism.

The evidence powerfully suggests one answer. If you want to know more about this, check out Christian Welzel’s articles on democracy!

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] socsa@piefed.social 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

He is absolutely fucking wrong. This tech bro libertarian shit is like the textbook definition of bad philosophy where overconfident smooth brains think in broad strokes instead of reducing ideas to first principles.

His definition of freedom simply doesn't exist, and this is an incredibly common trope in right wingers. He believes he is entitled to benefit from society without understanding the process by which those benefits arise. He misunderstands the distinction between "is" and "ought." And even this is an incredibly gentle critique of a person who gives unhinges PowerPoint presentations about the antichrist which he seems to actually believe. The man is loony tunes. Idk what they had in the water at PayPal back in the day, but him and Musk seem to have unlocked an entirely new level of unhinged.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 weeks ago

Imagine the pure liquid wealth your company accumulates when it takes 2-3% of a large swath of financial transactions on the Internet. It’s like Visa/MasterCard obscene.

Then imagine someone tells you “no”.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 31 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think Thiel is compatible with freedom, nor democracy. If he died we'd all be better off.

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 29 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

We no longer believe that Democracy and Sociopathic Oligarchs can co-exist. We choose Democracy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 26 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

We need to stop using PayPal!

[–] sepiroth154@feddit.nl 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

No need, just wait until they lock you out of your own account!

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 11 points 3 weeks ago

After Trump sanctions you for disagreeing with his policies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] i078@europe.pub 9 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, I’m ending my account today

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 22 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Take a good look, folks. This is the face of Anarcho-capitalism. Peter Thiel wants to be your new overlord. Unregulated and unrestrained.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 11 points 3 weeks ago

I hate having to use that term. It’s just feudalism without even the illusion of a binding social order.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

French style revolution is the only solution

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Daily reminder that 80% of people beheaded were working class.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

He doesn't mean freedom for the proles. He means his personal total and absolute freedom to exploit other people relentlessly and without consequences.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If your freedom depends on others not being free, you really just want the freedom to oppress.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] joeljoelle@piefed.blahaj.zone 17 points 3 weeks ago

These pieces of shit are especially egregious because they promised so much change and hope and opportunity for everyone but all their garbage companies just toed the old line instead of actually "disrupting" anything at all. The only thing they've disrupted is everyone's savings and futures

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 15 points 3 weeks ago

Anyone should feel free to utilize the second amendment when this guy appears

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Well clearly Peter Thiel has never read Murray Bookchin!

Man, I remember a debate he had with David Graeber (Someone who knew and did read Murray Bookchin). Thiel got absolutely schooled by our late great anthropologist-anarchist. Like utterly trashed by him, in that Graeber wasn't even trying to trash him he was just responding to Thiel's horrid conceits with his casual and playful depth of understanding.

You've gotta look it up on youtube. Thiel had fucking daggers in his eyes. Graeber was just having a good time with it. You cannot completely convince me that Thiel did not have some sort of hand in Graeber's early death.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 weeks ago

Billionaire oligarchs are incompatible with democracy, he's just got it backwards like most anti-humanity fascists tend to do

[–] Ariselas@piefed.ca 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

freedom and democracy are compatible
Hmm, I might agree Peter

Q48suh62huVQpVv.png

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] No1@aussie.zone 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It's really kind of sad that these people are surrounded by Yes men for so long that they think every thought they have and everything they say is correct and brilliant.

It's like they've built their own little personal echo chambers.

We humans really are a dumb fragile bag of meat and bones.

[–] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 weeks ago

I no longer believe that MY freedom and YOUR democracy are compatible. So you can't have democracy anymore so I can have my freedom to not be regulated.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

“I no longer want the restrictions on me that are punitive and serve to protect the masses at my expense.” -Thiel

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The sooner we eat this guy the better.

[–] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Don't eat this guy. He has used blood boys to try to keep himself young.

That's probably the kind of unregulated shit the gets you exposed to unknown pathogens and such. You don't want to eat that kind of meat.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

He is right. HIS freedom is not compatible with Democracy.

[–] snek_boi@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

This Peter Thiel piece of shit doesn’t understand human development. He says freedom and democracy are not compatible, and yet we have decades (and in some cases centuries) of data showing that democracies make people freer.

If I could kindly suggest to that asshole to read one book, I’d suggest he reads Christian Welzel’s Freedom Rising. The book is packed with data that shows how democracies create freedom.

For example, democracies invest in their own people.

  • Democracies invest in education, so that people can choose what kind of life to live.
  • Democracies invest in healthcare, so that people can live without freedom-limiting disease.
  • Democracies invest in research, so that people can solve technical problems with ease and spend more time doing things they can choose to do.

That’s just the tip of the iceberg. In many, many ways, democracy leads to freedom, true actual freedom.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

That all sounds like freedoms for other people. Those don't sound like freedoms Thiel needs.

You know that whole quote about "The right to swing my fist ends where the other man's nose begins." He's concerned about the first part.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Not even trying to understand. He's just another bored billionaire trying to stir the pot.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I no longer believe that Peter Thiel and oxygen are compatible.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

Eh hope it is otherwise he can't burn.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 weeks ago

It's funny how he calls it a lack of freedoms and we call it laws and human rights.

That's what he has an issue with: human rights and laws.

[–] Airfried@piefed.social 7 points 3 weeks ago

He's right. In his own twisted kind of way. Democracy is in the way of the overly rich to take complete control and become dictators. Being a dictator is their ultimate power fantasy of 'true freedom'.

I agree that Democracy is not compatible with his definition of giving the richest people on earth the freedom to have planar authority. So we must get rid of them to save democracy and our own freedom.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago

Remember kids, look around you. Too much money will fuck you up big time.

[–] shweddy@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

He thinks he should be free to rule over everyone poorer than hin

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 weeks ago

Ah it seems like the didn't say the entirety of what he believes, he really means:

I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible with my need to have more control over everyone else

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 6 points 3 weeks ago

Well isn't it obvious? Freedom is only compatible with wealthy elites pressing their boots (or the boots of their paid hirelings) against the necks of the people.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

Democracy only works when the people is at the wheel, not the oligarchs.

[–] hyperhopper@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Why is the headline and article about a quote that's almost 2 decades old?

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago

Just so everybody knows, he said this almost 20 years ago

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

well neither is fascism, you damn fascist

load more comments
view more: next ›