this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2026
418 points (99.3% liked)

Not The Onion

22010 readers
799 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new state law limits Florida communities’ aims to offset greenhouse gas emissions that are warming the global climate and intensifying disasters such as hurricanes.

Specifically, HB 1217 prohibits local governments from pursuing net-zero emissions goals. At least 10 cities and counties have implemented such policies, including Fort Lauderdale, Miami, Orlando, and Leon County, where Tallahassee, the state capital, is located. But the new law will not necessarily upend these policies, said Bradley Marshall, senior attorney at Earthjustice, an advocacy group.

“It’s certainly meant to scare municipalities and local governments from trying to do things to further net-zero policies,” he said. “Now, its exact impact and what it exactly prohibits is probably up for some debate. Things that are adjacent to it—emissions reductions and even climate change reduction policies—on their face will not run afoul at all of a ban on adopting a net zero policy.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 120 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)
[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 44 points 3 weeks ago

Small 'brained' government

[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No no, see it can be big as long as it works for the corporations, or, uh, we mean the people. It can be big as long as it works for the people. Wait no, that's not right either.

when they ask for small government, they do not mean lowering the scope of the government functions, but having less people who have more concentrated powers, and removing checks and balances.

[–] Master167@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Nothing says small government like the bigger government telling the smaller government no.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 61 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

how can we drive up property values

sink half of our state beneath the waves

brilliant

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I have no idea why their property is worth anything. Well I do, ignorant boomers. That market will someday crash though, as the sea retakes everything and the majority of younger folks have no interest in moving there.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

Disneyland will become the new Atlantis

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] xkbx@startrek.website 38 points 3 weeks ago

“We’re gonna need you to burn at least 500lbs of tires for every tree planted.”

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 32 points 3 weeks ago

Everyone who supported this bill is a climate criminal and should have a punishment proportional to poisoning every living person on the planet.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I love the small government party

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Let's go 'net-negative' policies

[–] cadekat@pawb.social 27 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I didn't think they'd be that dumb and leave a loophole for net-negative policies, but holy shit:

"Net zero policy" means any policy, program, or initiative designed to achieve a balance between total amount of greenhouse gas emitted into the atmosphere with an equal amount removed from the atmosphere.

It literally is net-zero. Removing more CO2 than you emit is absolutely allowed.

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Or, let's match 99% of emissions lolllll

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

99,99% lets go

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Their state is going to be under water in ten years...

Florida - The Maritime State

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Republicans really coming in clutch with that whole "small government and freedom" schtick, aint they.

[–] PenguinMage@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I've been told that only applies to the overall federal, and that states rights are important (somehow city & counties don't have those)... oddly enough these are the same places that claim that slavery wasn't the reason for the civil war.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The measure requires local governments to submit an affidavit annually to the state Department of Revenue verifying compliance. Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican, signed the measure on April 22, Earth Day, and the law will take effect July 1. It states that “net zero policies, carbon taxes and assessments, and emission trading programs are detrimental to this state’s energy security and economic interests and inconsistent with the energy policy and the environmental policy of this state.”

Jesus this is bad policy. Let people find energy wherever they want.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 weeks ago

Let people find energy wherever they want.

Doesn't align well with fascist policy.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They will be net zero when they are smooth expanse of shallow water

Soon enough.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Not even sure if this is legally enforceable past being a guideline.

Well, a Republican is doing it, so I’m sure our wise and beneficent Supreme Court will have no problem finding it enforceable

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

New target: Net Negative

Florida the carbon sink

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They really are trying to steamroll over society aren’t they. Fuck these idiot cunts

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mereo@piefed.ca 11 points 3 weeks ago

So... A "small" government is acting like a big brother...

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

We didn't know it was a documentary about Republicans back then.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 weeks ago

Now, its exact impact and what it exactly prohibits is probably up for some debate.

So it has no business being a law.

[–] maturelemontree@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

I get more worried every day shit like this comes out that the conspiracy theory that the rich want to accelerate the end of the world faster is true.

[–] Tobberone@feddit.nu 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oil dependence is use as a of controlling the world. Renewables changes that control. Therefore Renewables must be stopped.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

In the same way slave owners fought against freeing slaves as that would mean losing a whole lot of power. Oil embargoes are much less effective against a country that has 100% renewables.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 8 points 3 weeks ago

next week from florida: “florida bans humans from having a nice day”

[–] MushuChupacabra@piefed.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

He also looks cartoonishly evil.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 weeks ago

Since it was Russia's propaganda machine, maybe climate change will hit them first.

[–] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I'd like DeSantis to study this whole situation more. Perhaps putting him in the path of a hurricane would give him a more informed perspective.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 weeks ago

Love me that freedom

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 weeks ago

Haha Florida is full of idiots

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Freedom's just another word for "admit that Christ is in charge and I am his king here on earth" to these Republican-Nazi bastards.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mangoholic@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Fighting to not drown is illegal

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Are they weaponizing climate or trying to make most of the planet inhabitable to maximize profits?

Oh they're cashing checks.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Its immediate gratification and profit extraction for the anyone currently able. No planting trees for the next generation that's not tied to some grift.

load more comments
view more: next ›