this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
14 points (100.0% liked)

Doctor Who Social Club

416 readers
16 users here now

A community for discussing all things Doctor Who.


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to longtime fans feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. Spoiler protection will not be granted to information that is out in the mainstream media.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the DW franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
12-07 TWB 1x01 "Homo Aqua"
12-07 TWB 1x02 "Plastic Apocalypse"
12-14 TWB 1x03 "The Deep"
12-14 TWB 1x04 "The Witch of the Waterfall"
12-21 TWB 1x05 "The End of the War"

Doctor Who Wiki

---___

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Radio Times has more info on the tender process, and what it means in this context.

Tenders are usually issued by large companies or public bodies like local authorities, and the chosen bidder gets paid to provide a specific service like recruitment or security for them.

...

BBC programmes have gone out for tender before, lots of times; it just means that other production companies have a chance to take a crack at it and bring new voices to the table. It’s something they are required to do by the BBC Charter. This is also not the same thing as trying to find a streaming partner for the show.

According to the statement, the BBC will announce details of their tender process "in due course". When it’s ready it will go live on their dedicated tendering site, the BBC eSourcing Portal.

...

A typical tender process starts with a tender eligibility form (TEF) so they can shortlist financially stable companies who have at least half a chance of getting something done. A full tender invitation comes to those who pass the TEF and they must sign an NDA.

Production companies will answer a series of questions like mini essays, where the question tells you exactly what they want to hear. Once the tender is submitted (usually about a month after it opens), the assessment takes between 1-3 months. The BBC will invite presentations or pitches from shortlisted bidders once the assessment ends. For a huge show like this, only a few big companies will be in the running.

Once the decision is made, all bidders are told and the standstill period begins. This is 8-10 working days and lets bidders challenge the decision if they feel it was wrong. If there are no issues, the contract can go ahead on the agreed date, and we’ll get an announcement.

It’s important to note that the BBC aren’t selling the show as part of this process. The broadcaster confirmed: "The BBC retains all IP in Doctor Who. BBC Studios will continue to lead the global distribution of Doctor Who as well as licensing, consumer products, digital and immersive experiences on behalf of the BBC."

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Thanks for this. A lot of online comments seem to mistake "put out to tender" for being put to pasture. It's a little less dramatic than that at this point, but then the fandom seems to be a drama all of its own sometimes.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The sky has always been falling, and will continue to fall forevermore.

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 2 points 3 days ago

You mean "The Doctor". Or wait, is it "Gallifrey"?

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Does this mean it could come back with a smaller budget? I actually think that could be good, but don't fully understand the BBC jargon.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think it's practically a necessity at this point. I'm not in the camp of "Doctor Who should have a shoestring budget," but it could probably contract to at least the equivalent of what it was during the Chibnall era.

[–] SiliconAvatar@startrek.website 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To be fair, the Chibnall run looked really good to me. I don't want to stir the "Chibnall bad" pot, but the visual effects were absolutely top notch for a BBC produced show. Same with all of Moffat's seasons.

What they can afford now vs then is a completely different matter, but the fact that they're looking to do a solicitation round for external production companies might be telling. AFAICT the BBC's charter is up for renewal next year, and that may determine their finances going forward?

the visual effects were absolutely top notch for a BBC produced show.

No disagreement here - I'd be quite happy to return to that.

[–] Novamdomum@fedia.io 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So many missteps. So many bad decisions. It would take a miracle for Dr Who to get back to where it once was. In the meantime we'll always have Matt Smith 🙂

[–] KaChilde@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

The thing about Doctor Who is that everybody has a favourite era, even the new seasons.

Personally, I would not look back at the bloated-story-mess of the Moffat era and Matt Smith’s Doctor as the golden years. But I understand that people loved how to show changed in that period.

In 10 years, someone will look back at the Gatwa or Whittaker episodes with the same fondness people have for Smith or Capaldi or Eccleston today.