this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
503 points (99.6% liked)

News

38240 readers
1542 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Thousands of Southern Baptists overwhelmingly voted Wednesday to advance a formal ban on women pastors in the nation’s largest Protestant denomination, sending a clear message that men alone should preach to these conservative evangelical congregations.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] joeljoelle@piefed.blahaj.zone 116 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

It's very difficult to progress as a nation when you have millions of people who refuse to enter the 21st century.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 42 points 3 weeks ago (24 children)

It's very hard to moderate a religion when everyone with a functional brain leaves...

Which should be obvious, everytime someone leaves a church because it's too extreme, it gets more extreme.

It's like how neoliberals coming to the Dem party made it shittier and got us modern Republicans.

load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 94 points 3 weeks ago (41 children)

While driving one day in Toronto, I accidentally tuned the radio to a US based "Christian" radio station. It was absolutely horrifying. There was nothing about Jesus AT ALL and a lot of "armour of god" and "defend yourself against your enemies" and "build the empire of God's faithful".

Batshit crazy terrorist shit.

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

and yet he never once said "hey, you know what? free your fucking slaves". or "Hey, you know what? your daughters? they're people, too. Don't sell them as sex slaves." or "hey, you know what? ten year olds are too young to marry. don't be a fucking creep."

seems he has a vastly different understanding of who a "neighbor" is than I do today.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

This 1000%. So fucking tired of Christian apologists pretending that "no, all that bad stuff was the Old Testament, Jesus was actually pretty much a leftist".

Fuck off. He said himself that not one iota of that law will change, so the "new covenant" shit is just bullshit cope.

All he had to do was be like, "hey guys, how about we don't own people as property," but apparently that's just too much.

Instead, he'll just talk about how the rules in the OT still apply. Rules that literally include guidelines for how to properly rape and beat the shit out of your slaves.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

“hey, you know what? ten year olds are too young to marry. don’t be a fucking creep.”

In their cultural context, that wouldn't be that far outside the norm. The notion that there's this magical line at 16-18 (in the US, depending on the state - possibly lower if the older partner is close in age or if they are married) is a 20th century invention. So, a guy from a text about 2000 years ago not expressing views on age and sexuality that were invented less than a hundred years ago is not exactly shocking.

Before the industrial revolution, children were often treated like smaller adults. Childhood was much shorter than nowadays and adolescence basically wasn't a thing culturally for the vast majority of history.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (40 replies)
[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 51 points 3 weeks ago (26 children)

Abrahamic religions will keep women under their boot as long as they exist.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 42 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Remember, the Southern Baptists split from the mainstream Baptist Church because they supported enslavement.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

yep. it's funny the comments here being all mad. like... you want a extremist/fundamentalist sect to what... be shockingly progressive on this one issue? kind of a silly expectation.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 42 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (9 children)

I’m so sick of religious people.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 42 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Remember, folks, the reason the SBC split from mainline baptists was because of slavery.

The northern Baptist’s were opposed to slavery and southern baptists saw slave owners as “missionaries”. That is, people whose job is to “proselytize” the Baptist leadership at the time was dominated by the north and rejected slave owners as missionaries, and so the asshole southerners split off. Cuz they didn’t want to give up their slaves.

So fuck the SBC in particular.

[–] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 18 points 3 weeks ago

I mentioned above that I grew up Southern Baptist (not only as a church member, but also educated from preschool through high school at a Southern Baptist school; also attended two undergraduate schools with SBC roots) and guess what? They NEVER taught us this history. Wasn't until I started paying attention to things that I began to really wonder why the "Southern" was in our name...

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 17 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Remember also the slavers gave slaves a different Bible than the slavers had, so slaves wouldn't get ideas.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 3 weeks ago

I spent a lot of time in SBC. 2026, they will not perform an interracial marriage for their congregation.

They are the cells of MAGA. Fuck them and I hope hell is real just for them.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 30 points 3 weeks ago (12 children)

I vote to ban churches and all religious buildings.

Hell, ban religions. The world would be such a better place without the stoneage fairytales

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Lets tax churches with more than 10 million dollars in assets.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] fritobugger2017@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

let's not forget that the sole reason that the Southern Baptist Convention exists is because they wanted to keep black folks out of their churches. When the big Baptist association was taking a stand on civil rights, the scum bags that would become the Southern Baptists took their ball and left.

[–] Azal@pawb.social 21 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Oh no, it was way worse than that.

The SBC existed because Triennial Convention wouldn't accept slavery. The SBC was formed to uphold slavery. They didn't apologize as a congregation for their views until 1995. 150 years is a bit late to the party but it certainly helps inform why many of us aren't surprised by this.

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I am sure they will realize they are making a mistake and apologize 150 years from now.

I firmly believe that a woman who is in her heart a deeply racist and hateful person should be allowed to become a SBC pastor.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 weeks ago

Everyone who's been to a church knows how vitally important the speaker's pennis is to the sermon.

[–] rageagainstthemachine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Recently came across articles and videos of women who are actively fighting to lose their right to vote (they only want their husbands to), so yeah, this tracks.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

This is why we have to control the national educational curriculum on a national basis, and not allow backwards states to destroy the lives of their citizens by keeping them ignorant, just so they can control and exploit them. If they won't properly take care of the intellectual well-being of their own citizens, then we will.

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm surprised Southern Baptists allowed women pastors in the first place.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

The sole opposition came from South Carolina pastor Doug Mize. He said the measure wasn’t necessary because the denomination already has a mechanism to expel churches with women in senior pastoral positions, and it’s done so on multiple times.

“What we have already works,” he said.

It sounds like they can be assistants, but if one gets control they kick the whole church out

[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

What a fun people.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Welcome to Giliad. Blessed be the fruit, motherfuckers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thepig@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Women constitute 50% of the population, yet they keep voting for conservative assholes that restrict their freedoms. Honestly as a man it just doesn't make sense

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

My mom was telling me about how there are hardly any people left at church.

Apparently they had a split between the progressive and conservative factions of the church, and the progressives all departed.

The progressives tended to be the young families with children. The conservatives tended to be the people who will be dead soon. Like the church.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago
[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The same men telling women in the SBC to get out of the pulpit are the same men telling the victims of sexual offenses in SBC churches to shut up and get over it.

While women may have held a quieter role in supporting the pedo/rapey shit that goes down in the SBC and maybe still do, the VAST list of SCB sexual offenders and their protectors is made of men, the internal hierarchy of power is rigid and unyielding, and for as much concerned pearl-clutching as SBC leaders engage in every time it hits the news, which it does frequently, they still haven't really done anything to slow it down. A couple of these articles are older, but nothing substantial has changed:

20 years, 700 victims: Southern Baptist sexual abuse spreads as leaders resist reforms -- Houston Chronicle

How an Alleged Predator Remade the Southern Baptist Convention -- Texas Monthly

New Lawsuit: Paige Patterson, former Southern Baptist leader, humiliated woman who reported rape -- Houston Chronicle

Read these at your own risk: they are thoroughly sickening. But there is a pattern: for every individual who is harmed, there appears to be a machine ready to shut them down, one that was operative as far back as the 1970s.

So knowing what I know about what goes down in the SBC and has for decades, when I see a headline like the above, "Southern Baptists vote to advance a formal ban on churches with women pastors," I don't see it as having anything primarily to do with doctrine, especially since if the doctrine were that important there would be any number of things they'd already be doing differently.

Rather, I see a group of predators seeking to ensure that their hunting grounds remain fresh, open, and uncluttered with victims they have already used and/or anyone who would speak for them or act on their behalf.

I'm not a Christian and I have no dog in this hunt, but if there was ever a religious organization that desperately needs to be stopped on its institutional slide back to the 1950s (or 1750s), the SBC would absolutely be it.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This doesnt go far enough. They need to ban women and men!

Only spiritual entities that have ascended to a higher plane and propagate through dementional shifting.

Just like in the bible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 12 points 3 weeks ago

Trad-wives speed running to Gilead

[–] usernametbd@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 weeks ago

What do you expect from people who follow a 2,000+ year old book written by people we’d consider insane if we tried to speak with them today. It offers zero proof of its god and no one to this day has been able to bring any evidence. The bible’s been rewritten over a dozen times under the influence of kings with their own agendas. Yet somehow this work of fiction (by all applicable standards it should be) is what these people form their lives around. They magically always find a way to interpret its passages to support their own biases. Regardless of the amazing ideas philosophy and science have brought to humanity, they keep retreating to the magical thinking of the past. Of course they hate progress like women having power in their little club.

[–] AvocadoCumToast@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 weeks ago

oppressive banjo noises

[–] Ontimp@feddit.org 11 points 3 weeks ago

Blessed be the fruit.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 weeks ago

Moderately surprised that the branch of Christianity devoted to preserving slavery didn’t already ban women from being pastors.

[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 weeks ago

"Boys' club votes to confirm that girls are yucky and dumb" is all I see.

[–] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 10 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

I grew up Southern Baptist, with a lean toward the even more fundamentalist side of things. I'm now Episcopalian. I remember Pastor Lynne, the first woman priest I ever had. Completely changed my perspective on this subject. It's funny, but the clergy and theologians who have been the most influential to me in recent years have largely been women: Kate Sonderegger, Catherine Pickstock, Kathy Grieb (two of those names were professors of mine in seminary). And my diocese (Hawai'i) just elected the first woman to be our bishop in our history! Saint Mary Magdalene was the first person to proclaim the resurrection of Jesus, in effect making her the first Christian evangelist. Sad that there are still so many parts of the Christian world that fail to heed what Jesus was doing.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 9 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

That's what happens when 20+ books are excluded from the Bible.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

Allowing bronze age discriminating principles that reflect clearly bad morals are a sin not a virtue. These principles are also illegal in most civilized countries. Allowing special pleading for religions on issues we know are morally wrong, is a crime against humanity.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago

Maybe they should ban Southern Baptists?

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

What's the point of having two catholic churches? This is removing the SB's only marketing niche.

Southern Baptists:

  • full of pedophiles
  • has women pastors

Catholic Church

  • full of pedophiles
  • no women priests
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 8 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Sure, alienate half your members, good plan.

"Say, Clem, any idea why donations are down?"

[–] NathanDerWeise@feddit.org 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Lmao they aren't alienating themself from the majority of their members at all. You know which churches have women pastors? The same ones that let queers in and talk about "accepting" people.

I grew up going to a Southern Baptist church. This decision will not be unpopular.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›