this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
450 points (99.3% liked)

World News

57209 readers
1289 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 166 points 1 month ago (22 children)
[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 62 points 1 month ago (6 children)

And we add it to the pile....

Another day another war crime from this piece of shit country...

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago

You are right. It is more adequate term

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] metermatic26@lemmy.world 78 points 1 month ago (11 children)

I quess water infrastructure is on the table now. Good job, America.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Huh, wouldn't expect that from someone who regularly passes cognitive tests (/s)

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 month ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

Oh but that would be "terrorism".

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] barneyrubble@lemmy.world 60 points 1 month ago (5 children)

The guy is clearly insane and out of control. This is squarely on the heads of JD Vance and Marco Rubio for not invoking the 25th amendment. This was obviously not a military target and was designed to cause mass civilian casualties and death.

OH HELL NO! Not in our name!

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 76 points 1 month ago (2 children)

As a Native American I regret to inform you that

This was obviously not a military target and was designed to cause mass civilian casualties and death.

is entirely typical of the US government.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's straight up our SOP

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What world are you living in that you think the 25th amendment would work right now? Vance and Rubio are pieces of shit. But why would they throw away their lifelong careers of being pieces of fucking shit for something that would get them ostracized from their tribe, and leave the other side also hating them?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 month ago

Oh look: more war crimes.

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Why wouldn't other countries just not sanction us?

seriously this and the killing random people in fishing boats with no due process in international waters are war crimes.

If China, Russia, EU and everyone else said nah fuck you we won't buy any of your shit or sell you any of our shit would that not fix the problem in like, one months time?

Seriously why isn't this happening?? Couldn't the ICC make its members do something like this? Or is that not how that works?

I'm just trying to understand. There must be something the world can do that doesn't involve war why don't they do that?

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Why wouldn’t other countries just not sanction us?

Because the vast majority of countries are dependent on the USAs financial system, odds are very good your country is dependent on that same system in thousands of ways. Especially Europe.

They hate America even as they depend upon it... and it's even worse than that, as the USA is controlled by banking interests that have been around since the slavery days. Should America disappear tomorrow, another "financial center" will replace it, it's an international web of financial interests.

Their only goal is profit, national concerns are irrelevant to them.

[–] fluckx@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (6 children)

The USA is not part of the ICC and does not recognize its jurisdiction.

https://asp.icc-cpi.int/states-parties

These are the states that signed the Rome Statute.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I think they're all too reliant on the US and they notice, the US kinda has them by the balls, strategically. They all seem to be quiet quitting / ghosting, and that seems to be all the power they have. What they're doing will be felt for decades, it's more of a slow burn, they are kinda sanctioning, in the sense of removing reliance of all US products. The US govt has built itself up as an evil superpower, with tendrils of control over other countries, military posts, strategic assassinations. What do they have on Australia, that makes them defund supports for disabled people, just to be able to bomb Iran along with the US. There's some deep seeded control going on there, and in many other places.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 8 points 1 month ago

Russia is already sanctioned/sanctioning due to the Ukraine War. China maybe could, but they are more focused on renegotiating a trade deal. The EU is already in the process is strategic decoupling and can't go that much faster. Any other country is likely going to either have enough economic consequences that they can't afford to or are doing so little trade that it doesn't mean anything any way.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 month ago

My news didn't tell me this. Total dick move, if Iran hit an aquifer of an allied country our media would cry foul. Fucking cunts.

[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

If you count all the war crimes committed by US soldiers, regardless of who was president, you will come to the conclusion that the US is an imperial, colonial, exploitative power.

Previously, they hid behind diplomacy, the UN, "freedom", "democracy". Donald Trump has portrayed the US as it has been all these years after the Second World War, selfish, greedy, without a shred of empathy.

That is why some Americans cannot stand Trump because he exposes them for what they are.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This isn't even unusual, I'm surprised they didn't do it sooner.

The USA is hopeful that there will be a civilian uprising, and will do anything in its power to make life in Iran as miserable as possible. Even as they complain about Iran's killing of civilians, they will murder those same civilians.

Recall that over 500K Iraqis died to topple Hussein for the crime of killing 20K Iraqis.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sportsjorts@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 month ago (7 children)

So more war crimes. Yay. Proud to be an American were at least I know I’m shackled to a government run by pedophiles, corporations, and foreign interests.

Let’s make everyone in the U.S. vote and see what happens. I feel like at least once before the great experiment totally implodes we should just try that once since we are so fucking free and are the best fucking democracy ever……

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Humanitarian law is also designed to protect civilian objects, including those indispensable to the survival of the civilian population. Article 29 of the Convention on the law relating to the non-navigational uses of international watercourses [available on http://www.un.org/], adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations in 1997, stipulates:

“International watercourses and related installations, facilities and other works shall enjoy the protection accorded by the principles and rules of international law applicable in international and non-international armed conflict and shall not be used in violation of those principles and rules”.

General protection under the law applicable to armed conflicts extends to more than international watercourses, and the four main prohibitions laid down in that law are worth noting:

the ban on employing poison or poisonous weapons; the ban on destroying, confiscating or expropriating enemy property; the ban on destroying objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population; the ban on attacking works or installations containing dangerous forces.

The four prohibitions, to which should be added the provisions on environmental protection, are expressly mentioned in the instruments relating to international armed conflicts, and the last two are also laid down in the law applicable to non-international armed conflicts. Starvation as a method of warfare is explicitly prohibited regardless of the nature of the conflict, and the concept of objects essential for the survival of the civilian population includes drinking-water installations and supplies and irrigation works. Immunity for indispensable objects is waived only when these are used solely for the armed forces or in direct support of military action. Even then, the adversaries must refrain from any action which could reduce the population to starvation or deprive it of essential water.

https://casebook.icrc.org/case-study/water-and-armed-conflicts

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Meanwhile, the rest of the world thinks that it's okay to remain entirely silent when the US breaches the Geneva Convention.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 10 points 1 month ago

they are silent because ISRAEL INSTIGATED It, and they dont want to offend either country right now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The targets that were hit are not being reported in the US at all as far as I can tell.

Just "strikes in Southern Iran".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I don't understand how people can follow a command like this and then go home and sleep at night.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is literally what the US has been doing for 70 years.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Doesn't change the question.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

fresh war crimes. The US needs to sign onto the ICC so our leaders can go explain themselves in court.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

US just made it Total War, IRGC are hardcore fundamentalists, they're not above poisoning an entire states water supply and you just gave them casus belli.

Good work Orange Man.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Uh, in case you weren't aware, they are poisoning all of our water here in the US as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CyroSignal@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (11 children)
[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Where is the UN when russia sends drones straight in Chornobyl confinement unit for shits and giggles and proceeds to brag about it for months? Same shit, pal.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wonder if the Israelis were somehow involved in shooting down the chopper. The crazy fucks want the damn war to rage on so they can steal more land from Lebanon and the West Bank.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago

The helicopter was illegally in iranian territory. It doesn't matter if iran or iarael shot it down. The usa had no right to bomb Iran again

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Okay, those laws of war run on "as long as you don't do it, I won't either". America's allies in the region also need water, what if Iran strikes at their reservoirs in retaliation? Trump may have escalated the war into terrifying new territory.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago

"Hey! You possibly shot down a military helicopter from us while it was performing illegal operations within your territory! That goes too far, fuck the Geneva convention, you will pay!"

load more comments
view more: next ›