this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
688 points (97.4% liked)

Brand New Sentence

447 readers
2 users here now

Showcasing the brazen and nouveau in English communication.

  1. Be cool to each other and follow the lemmy.today instance rules.
  2. Post title must be the sentence, or relevant portion of the sentence if it's very long.
  3. Link for context if possible.
  4. Tag NSFW where applicable.
  5. This instance has no rules against calls to violence, please don't report general wishes for violence. Direct implications of harm (i.e. I will shoot x person in the head) will be moderated at our discretion.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 110 points 4 months ago (13 children)

As a libertarian I would advocate selling liquor to all babies who want it.

[–] drcobaltjedi@programming.dev 79 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Man, I miss the "As a libertarian" guy on reddit. Dude would start every comment like that before saying something insane.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 37 points 4 months ago

Hilariously redundant.

[–] Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml 29 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Praximis_Prime_ARG iirc, the best part was that they'd include a link to a libertarian actually saying that exact thing.

[–] drcobaltjedi@programming.dev 18 points 4 months ago

Yeah!!! That's the guy. He's used multiple accounts over the years. Dude was funny as hell.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] elvith@feddit.org 11 points 4 months ago

As a libertarian, I'd also still comment on Reddit.

[–] Rusty@lemmy.ca 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

As a libertarian I would advocate selling liquor to all babies who can afford it.

FTFY

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago (3 children)

As a 19th century physician I can only agree, and suggest pairing it with a spoonful of soothing cocaine syrup for maximum efficacy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 9 points 4 months ago

Don’t waste my fucking time, baby beer.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 48 points 4 months ago (11 children)

If there was a fire and you only had time to save one of these, which would you save: a one-month old baby, or a flask containing 100 frozen human embryos.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is the fire making me uncomfortable? I might just sit there saying "This is fine" until it's too late to save either.

Or scout outside to make sure it is really safer than inside before discovering it's too late to save either.

Or maybe flip the lever between the front wheels and back wheels going over the switch for some multi-track drifting--ah nm, that doesn't work for this version of the trolly problem.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 18 points 4 months ago

I respect your rejection of the premise.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 31 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Will I sell booze to this baby? Absolutely.

Will I extend this baby booze on credit? Not in this economy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 26 points 4 months ago (5 children)

What I really want to know: Is Abortionado pronounced like afficianado, and they are an expert in abortions? Or is it like Tornado, and they are a tornado of abortions?

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I assumed the first one before reading your comment, probably because I am too feeble to imagine an abortion tornado on my own.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 23 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

puts on devil's advocate hat

No, because liquor laws don't care about when life began. They care about date of birth. Life beginning at conception does not erase date of birth as a valid type of data.

removes hat because I'm not pro-life

We should not rely on "pro-lifers are too stupid to understand how to refute this" when deciding our views.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Grabthar@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

How is this confusing anyone? We count age from date of birth. Anything that happens before that has nothing to do with your legal age any more than whether you were carried for more or less than 9 months. This would only become interesting if someone froze a toddler for 30 years or something.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Yeah, seems like this might be a bad faith argument intended to cause more division. It's a flimsy argument that people who like the point it's trying to make might ignore that big thing that makes it fall apart while those against it won't ignore that and will see the other side ignoring it as dishonest.

[–] DioramaOfShit@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 months ago (6 children)

He can buy it, but maybe he should wait to drink it.

My rule is, if you are dead when brain dead with a beating heart then you are not alive until you are brain alive with a beating heart. Life starts with brain activity, around 16 weeks.

[–] Codpiece@feddit.uk 20 points 4 months ago (3 children)
[–] S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (12 children)

I go by the Jewish rule.

In the Old Testament, God breathed life into Adam, and thus he became a living soul.

So until the infant takes its first breath, it's not an actual soul. It is a lump of tissue with potential.

I hope that there are as few abortions as are absolutely necessary, but I will not begrudge a single person their choice to have an abortion regardless of the stage of the pregnancy at which it happens.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 10 points 4 months ago

Alas, that's not the legal definition. Another reminder that legal is not necessarily ethical, and vice-versa.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I read that cut-off sign as saying

“YAY!

IT’S

TRANSFEM”

and all I could think was “imagine knowing that early AND having supportive parents”

[–] PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

The baby's 30 so it's not that early /s

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 4 months ago

Trying not to upvote flawed arguments just because it supports my views challenge: IMPOSSIBLE

[–] Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (10 children)

Isnt it called birth day for a reason?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 months ago

In this thread: people who are going to lose our liquor sales licenses when we're caught in a sting operation by an undecover cop baby.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Jokes on you: the kid can't pay for liquor!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] plutopos@lemmy.zip 10 points 4 months ago (6 children)

I am pro-choice & think that life begins at birth, but this argument is fallacious. Even if you believed that life begins at conception, you could coherently claim that this baby is physically still a baby and cannot safely take alcohol

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I'd sell liquor to ANY baby. Drunk babies and toddlers are hilarious.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›