this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
684 points (97.4% liked)

Brand New Sentence

256 readers
96 users here now

Showcasing the brazen and nouveau in English communication.

  1. Be cool to each other.
  2. Post title must be the sentence, or relevant portion of the sentence if it's very long.
  3. Link for context if possible.
  4. Tag NSFW where applicable.

I'm looking for another mod, someone chill. DM me if you're interested.

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 109 points 3 weeks ago (13 children)

As a libertarian I would advocate selling liquor to all babies who want it.

[–] drcobaltjedi@programming.dev 78 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Man, I miss the "As a libertarian" guy on reddit. Dude would start every comment like that before saying something insane.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 36 points 3 weeks ago

Hilariously redundant.

[–] Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml 28 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Praximis_Prime_ARG iirc, the best part was that they'd include a link to a libertarian actually saying that exact thing.

[–] drcobaltjedi@programming.dev 17 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah!!! That's the guy. He's used multiple accounts over the years. Dude was funny as hell.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] elvith@feddit.org 11 points 3 weeks ago

As a libertarian, I'd also still comment on Reddit.

[–] Rusty@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

As a libertarian I would advocate selling liquor to all babies who can afford it.

FTFY

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

As a 19th century physician I can only agree, and suggest pairing it with a spoonful of soothing cocaine syrup for maximum efficacy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 9 points 3 weeks ago

Don’t waste my fucking time, baby beer.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 63 points 3 weeks ago (17 children)

Objection! They believe that life starts at conception, but not that aging starts at conception! This is why people are not considered 9 months old at birth!

Conceptually, people can also be frozen at any age, which "pauses" or slows their aging (see: Captain America, Han Solo, Dave Lister)

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 37 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

that's a good steelman. but this is why I think the better argument is Hasan's usual hypothetical about this: there's a fire in a hospital and you can only get into one of the rooms in time to save some people. do you go into NICU where you could save a couple babies or to the IVF section where you can save thousands of embryos?

[–] plutopos@lemmy.zip 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This hypothetical is great as it forces them to admit born babies are more important than embryos, but it doesn't prove embryos are not alive

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

it's not about them being alive; embryos are alive, that's not even disputed. it's about whether the life is a person. if you think the babies are more important you're already conceding the embryos don't have personhood, or at least not to the degree that babies do.

either case they shouldn't have the same rights as actual people. if you think an embryo is a person then you can't choose the couple babies over so many people. or if you do it's still going to be fun hearing you try to justify it without conceding.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Like I tell a friend of mine who was premature: Do you want to celebrate your birthday today or in a couple months when you should have been born?

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 48 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

If there was a fire and you only had time to save one of these, which would you save: a one-month old baby, or a flask containing 100 frozen human embryos.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Is the fire making me uncomfortable? I might just sit there saying "This is fine" until it's too late to save either.

Or scout outside to make sure it is really safer than inside before discovering it's too late to save either.

Or maybe flip the lever between the front wheels and back wheels going over the switch for some multi-track drifting--ah nm, that doesn't work for this version of the trolly problem.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 weeks ago

I respect your rejection of the premise.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 31 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Will I sell booze to this baby? Absolutely.

Will I extend this baby booze on credit? Not in this economy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 26 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

What I really want to know: Is Abortionado pronounced like afficianado, and they are an expert in abortions? Or is it like Tornado, and they are a tornado of abortions?

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I assumed the first one before reading your comment, probably because I am too feeble to imagine an abortion tornado on my own.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

puts on devil's advocate hat

No, because liquor laws don't care about when life began. They care about date of birth. Life beginning at conception does not erase date of birth as a valid type of data.

removes hat because I'm not pro-life

We should not rely on "pro-lifers are too stupid to understand how to refute this" when deciding our views.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DioramaOfShit@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grabthar@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

How is this confusing anyone? We count age from date of birth. Anything that happens before that has nothing to do with your legal age any more than whether you were carried for more or less than 9 months. This would only become interesting if someone froze a toddler for 30 years or something.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

He can buy it, but maybe he should wait to drink it.

My rule is, if you are dead when brain dead with a beating heart then you are not alive until you are brain alive with a beating heart. Life starts with brain activity, around 16 weeks.

[–] Codpiece@feddit.uk 20 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (12 children)

I go by the Jewish rule.

In the Old Testament, God breathed life into Adam, and thus he became a living soul.

So until the infant takes its first breath, it's not an actual soul. It is a lump of tissue with potential.

I hope that there are as few abortions as are absolutely necessary, but I will not begrudge a single person their choice to have an abortion regardless of the stage of the pregnancy at which it happens.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 10 points 3 weeks ago

Alas, that's not the legal definition. Another reminder that legal is not necessarily ethical, and vice-versa.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I read that cut-off sign as saying

“YAY!

IT’S

TRANSFEM”

and all I could think was “imagine knowing that early AND having supportive parents”

[–] PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

The baby's 30 so it's not that early /s

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 3 weeks ago

Trying not to upvote flawed arguments just because it supports my views challenge: IMPOSSIBLE

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 weeks ago

In this thread: people who are going to lose our liquor sales licenses when we're caught in a sting operation by an undecover cop baby.

[–] Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

Isnt it called birth day for a reason?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] plutopos@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

I am pro-choice & think that life begins at birth, but this argument is fallacious. Even if you believed that life begins at conception, you could coherently claim that this baby is physically still a baby and cannot safely take alcohol

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Jokes on you: the kid can't pay for liquor!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I'd sell liquor to ANY baby. Drunk babies and toddlers are hilarious.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›