this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
19 points (91.3% liked)

World News

56238 readers
1804 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Nothing says "distract from the Epstein files" by indicting a 95 year old...

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

Speaking of

[–] Todd_cross@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

95 year old former leader of another country

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sets a good precedent, in case any other countries are watching and want to give Trump some fun during his retirement.

[–] WaxRhetorical@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Nevermind Trump, he'll be dead from his shit living before he can stand trial. You guys need to deal with everyone else, all the enablers, collaborators, co-conspirators

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

95 by the time they actually do anything. June 3rd.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What would be the point. Cuba is already heavily immiserated due to US blockade and sanctions.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Trump wants a pretext to invade Cuba. This could be just like Iraq and Bush demanding Hussain step down or be invaded.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They’re probably going to kidnap him just like they did to Maduro.

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

the USA had turncoats in Venezuela that simply handed Maduro over. I don't think that kidnapping Raul Castro will be that simple.

[–] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 5 points 3 days ago

We've all seen what americans tolerate in their own leaders. These indictments mean less than nothing.

[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Indict our own prez, he has more than enough things to be charged with.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well that's the #1 thing we learned last time, the Justice Department serves the executive and will not investigate or indict their boss.

Good argument to move the Justice Department from the executive branch to the Judicial Branch. Give the Supreme Court some teeth.

[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

As much as I'd love to see little donnie charged with everything in the books...

Putting enforcement under the purview of the branch primarily charged with interpreting the laws gives a rather perverse incentive to see their own prosecutors succeed and as such interpret things to accomplish that goal. It's bad enough having lifetime scotus appointments by a president extending their influence beyond their term, putting prosecution in that same branch's watch could secure a dictator-in-abstentia spot pretty quick.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Well, moving it would require either an amendment or a new constitution, so you fix that problem with term limits and greater checks and balances on the Judicial.

The Court has always had a problem with enforcement:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worcester_v._Georgia

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

W. Bush, Clinton, Obama, Trump and Biden are still around. They should be the ones indicted with killing millions of people in the last 3 decades.