Who is this irrelevant twitter rando-
Alexander Dugin reposted
this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
75 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
872 readers
466 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The daughter might had it coming too but damn I wish it was him in that car bombing
Ngl it's pretty funny to see people saying this now bcs i remember when it happened people on here getting really mad at people making fun of the assassination
Why are we hating someone for having a shitty father?
That's why "might", idk if she was a professional rightwing bullshiter as her father, or better or worse
I can't remember whether it's a nick land alt or just a guy who's a big fan of his work
The twitter rando is, unfortunately, Nick Land.
Meth didn't kill him decades ago?
Lmao wtf
So yeah a twitter rando.
How does one go all Roman Catholic about it? Feel guilty about something?
Nick Land embracing Catholic Social Teaching would be a pivot for sure.
What is that even supposed to mean?
I think maybe they are lamenting that rich "leftists" (neoliberals who are not explicitly, outwardly racist, misogynistic, and queerphobic) have taken control of large social media companies and are imposing advertiser friendly rules on right wing spaces, and they see it as the woke being forced upon them?
Ironically, I had the opposite interpretation, that they’re lamenting that the right is too hung up on cultural issues, which they attribute as being a thing that came out of the “left”. They think the right needs to return to cut and dry capitalist economics as conservative politics goes off the rails without it.
That we can come to such widely different conclusions speaks to how vague the tweet is.
It's even more embarrassing that we are losing to such idiots.
I don't think the people with actual power think like this
J D Vance and Peter Thiel are both massive fans of this guy, Elon Musk is probably too insofar as he's seen some memes on twitter about him and thinks he sounds cool
fr?
Xenocosmography is Nick Land
goddamnit
You can't imagine the monetary gains i've made from abstaining from investing and any other form of capital gains on principle
I actually just bought my second senator (I wanted to buy my first media corporation first)
"still trying to work this out"
I'd probably start with the infinite growth on a finite planet stuff and work towards an addiction to oil. From there I might look at the inefficiencies until I could dip my toes into violent enforcement of waste. From there it's pretty open world seeing as how you could go to the violent enforcement of empire, the distribution of resources, or externalities. Personally, my recommendation would be distribution of resources because if the original inquiry was "something is wrong with the theory" then distribution would lead one to see China outcompeting the US under a different theoretical base which might make it seem more natural to view the naked fascism as stupid and evil.