this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
723 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

84567 readers
4565 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 218 points 3 weeks ago

There's NOTHING Safer than having the Epstein Class KNOW where Kids are and WHEN they're Home Alone!

-US Politicians!

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 158 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Remember folks, age verification is personal identity verification.

[–] VoodooAardvark@lemmy.zip 57 points 3 weeks ago

💯 don’t call it age verification - that’s just what the unmasked scooby-doo villain is still hiding behind.

[–] nullify3112@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Well they could do it the right way where, for example, you go to your city hall to get a certificate of age where they check your ID. Then some cryptography happens so you only enter a public key from that certificate on a website or OS to verify your age.

The website or OS doesn’t check your ID. City hall doesn’t know your browsing history.

But I’m not fooling myself, that’s not the point of such a law.

[–] BonkTheAnnoyed@piefed.blahaj.zone 18 points 3 weeks ago (12 children)

no implementation of personal ID for internet access will ever be "correct."

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 117 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

"Key questions remain unanswered, such as the definition of “operating system provider,” the type of verification required, the focus on major commercial platforms, and the potential scope beyond them."

I guarantee this bill is unenforceable. Cars, phones, traffic lights all have have computers with operating systems. All modern tech has an operating system of some sort. Also how do you even verify age? If my laptop is offline can I just not use it because it can't confirm my id? What about tech that never goes online but has an OS, like a calculator? I can't believe microsoft and apple are not lobbying against this. Who becomes liable if an "underage" person is accidentally given access or if access is denied to an "of age" person. I can just imagine an emt frantically looking for their driver's license so they can use the computerized defibrillator.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 57 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Microsoft is probably salivating at the idea of being the only legal OS provider.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 44 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)
[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 46 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Meta is funding a lot of the lobbyists pushing for age verification laws. Uncoincidentally, Meta both owns a stake in a company providing identity verification as a service, and serves to benefit from not having to moderate its own platforms.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It feels like a Mr. Smith Goes to Washington display would solve this.

Just bring everything that has an operating system in it into the room. Cars, boats, planes, construction equipment, tractors, factories, knock off game consoles, literally every server on the internet.

Show them the ridiculousness of this and maybe we’ll get dragged out by police and charged with contempt of congress

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Don't give them even better ideas. To you it sounds ridiculous, to them it sounds like "we can ban people we don't like from using modern technology by invalidating their age verification"

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 85 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

They cant even define an OS. Do i need a fucking login for my wifi fridge and toaster. Such a stupid ffucking law.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 77 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Rules being implemented and enforced by actual pedophiles

[–] Virtvirt588@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 64 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Okay, what is this bill actually saying?

That soon, you won't even be able to own most computers without registering it under a government ID?

Because that's fucking nuts.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Make guns connect to the internet and watch what happens then.

[–] Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Your ammo is running low.

Would you like to subscribe to the Silver Ammo Monthly Supply plan?

Click here to watch an ad for one free bullet.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 62 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Palantir really wants it's fucking database.

All because Petey truly believes that there are demons living in the United States.

[–] TransNeko@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

there are demons living in the USA. all Petey has to do to find the closest one... is look in a mirror.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 51 points 3 weeks ago (13 children)

Everyone in this comment section, you're just gonna take this? Its been time, but if this is what motivates you to throw bricks at politicians then lets go

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] devolution@lemmy.world 45 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

I'm having a hard time understanding how this is going to keep kids safe.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 38 points 3 weeks ago

That's because it is never about the children.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The same way the next laws will keep kids safe. When you leave your front door, you will have to drop your pants so the TSA can check your asshole. It's necessary. You know. To keep kids safe.

/s

🤦‍♂️🤷‍♂️

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Eggyhead@lemmy.world 44 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Don’t want to compete with a potentially capable Linux? Pay the government to make it illegal!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 37 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

Now do you see why I don't trust government?

Because it does things like this. And it's not just our US government doing it. The entire world is getting more and more authoritarian.

Government seeks power. Always. Which is why it must always be restrained.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 35 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (9 children)

palintir, meta, google are all behind it. it serves 2 purposes; silencing dissidents and TRACKING women/potential mothers as brood mares.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

unrelated but I just want to say theres like 4 separate comments using the word "TrumpID" to describe this age verification, and i think this would be a great way to mock it just like how conservatives called the aca "ObamaCare"

[–] Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Except it's more ZuckID, since Meta was behind the "grassroots" campaigns and wrote the script "representatives" are using globally.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 3 weeks ago

well neither did Obama personally write the affordable care act, but here we are

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You misunderstand, TrumpID is the company that will soon be created that will be the mandatory provider for all OS to use (and pay licence fees to).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Janx@piefed.social 34 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

The Internet is built upon and requires anonymous participation! This is an attempt to end privacy...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Vieric@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Has Bipartisan support too. The corporations want this, and both of our parties listen to them first and us a distant second. Catering to corporate wants is about the only thing the two parties can agree on. It's probably going to pass, even if I hope it doesn't. Buckle up my friends...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

In the future, you'll be sentenced to 10 years hard labour for a contraband OS while children are raped openly at lavish parties.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jarvis2323@programming.dev 30 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Since all TV’s are smart TV’s with an OS this means age verification to watch TV? I think that’s a message that will resonate with the average consumer on what is wrong with this bill

[–] AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Some people fridges will need age verification

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LostWanderer@fedia.io 30 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Ugh, this is so disgusting! They desperately want control over things they should never have! I've shared my opinion will all three of my representatives.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Meta, etc pushing this so that they don’t have to.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 24 points 3 weeks ago

Fuck everything's my about this.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Yup, from the party of pedophiles

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (12 children)

I can just stop being online. I show my library card when I need to renew my stateID

[–] sns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

If the fascists get much further, possessing a library card will disqualify you from voting.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I’m so sick of this depraved pedophile oligarch Mossad shit

[–] thax@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

A few years ago, due in part to frustration with our information environs, but also for fun, I decided against getting broadband internet after moving to a new apartment. I didn't have real internet for about 2 years. I did have 1GB/mo of cell data and used a 2nd SIM in a 4g mPCIE card as an uplink for my LAN. I restricted myself to mainly text using JS-free http applications or light protocols like gopher, irc, rss, etc. I quite enjoyed my time having to be very mindful of my data usage. It forced me to fully audit all the technology on my LAN.

If this kind of legislation passes, I simply won't pay for internet. If both ISPs and telecoms start restricting devices, then I'll forego cell-based data as well. If public wifi spots become too restrictive, I won't patron those spots. I've accumulated more offline content on my server than I could ever consume in many lifetimes, so it really isn't a loss. Hell, it'd be an opportunity to organize it all well, and share via meshnets. Don't tempt me with a good time, politicians. I could save money, nerd out, and cut the noise from my information environments? Sign me up!

edit: I wanted to add: I do really like having a fiber link, but the main draw is having the ability to host my own services. If that goes away due to hierarchical pricing or device/encryption restrictions, 95% of the value prop disappears. I will not be strong armed into using overly-centralized services.

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 16 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Primary Josh Gottheimer. Write in anyone else against him. Vote against him or withhold voting at all in the general.

Do not signal that this is tolerated.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The smart doorlock my dad install now needs an age verification now?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›