this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2026
44 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

68674 readers
99 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I know this is kind of baby pirate knowledge but ive always just used a downloader for my streaming service. I have since moved to Linux entirely (massive win BTW, patting myself on the back for that) but there is no Linux-compatible downloader for my specific service. At least not one with the bulk functionality I would like. Any downloaders for Tidal or other sources of high-quality audio, likely to have some relatively niche old death metal? I'm a nerd about the quality.

edit: Just looked at the megathread and there seems to be some tools compatible with Tidal. Regardless, are there any applications that are alternatives? I'd like to see ALL of my options <3

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chrisbit@leminal.space 8 points 23 hours ago (3 children)
[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I clicked on new to see what it had and saw the new album by a popular American rapper. I hit the download button, and inside of 30 seconds, it gave me a handful of FLAC files in a ZIP folder. Fed them to fre:ac, the metadata is good; however, it had the ARTIST tag copied to the ALBUMARTIST tag, which made the output a little messy (I have it output to ALBUMARTIST(YEAR) ALBUM), but I was able to expand all the folders, dump the m4a files I made into mp3tag, and straighten them up. Album cover was embedded and 1280x1280. No ads in the comments or even the filename of the zip file.

Bookmarked.

Oh, I also searched for an obscure(ish) Japanese band I like. It had most of their stuff. Not all, and not my favourite song by them, but it had a lot of stuff.

FYI to others, if you see the [HD] tag on something, I'm thinking that means they have it in FLAC, as opposed to MP3 or AAC/M4A. Though unless you have really good ears and/or an expensive hi-fi system, I doubt most of you can tell my m4a output from the flac input. If you can, I hope you have enough hard drives to support your collection. I don't need FLAC, but I'll use it to get the best possible sound at roughly a quarter to half the filesize (I use aac low complexity at the highest bitrate fre:ac supports).

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

It's even open-source! Nice site.

it had the ARTIST tag copied to the ALBUMARTIST tag

This isn't wrong though - it's a proper use of both tags. I think most of my music has both tags populated.

That site is pulling from Tidal, which is why the tags are good. All the legit streaming sites have well-tagged files.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

No, those two tags are not the same. ARTIST is everyone performing on the track. ALBUMARTIST is who the album is credited to. So for example Santana's Supernatural, from the 1990s. The song "Smooth" that everyone knows. ARTIST would be something like Santana / Rob Thomas, or Santana feat. Rob Thomas, whereas ALBUMARTIST would be Santana.

Let me put it another way — do you want five copies of an album because four songs have collaborations? So one album is all the solo stuff, one album has one song with one collaboration, and so on... or do you want one copy of the album with all the songs on it as they appear on the album itself?

[–] atropa@piefed.social 1 points 21 hours ago

Never heard of this ,ty

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

What's going on here? Is it just pulling from someone's Tidal account?

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes. The search results and music files are coming directly from Tidal, using someone else's account. If you look in the network tab in the browser's dev tools, you'll see requests to Tidal.

Interesting design, since it's trivial for Tidal to block something like this - they can see that the requests are coming from that site. I'm surprised they haven't blocked it.

[–] UndergroundParking@lemmy.cafe 1 points 13 hours ago

If you see requests to tidal in your browser - they're not going there from the server, are they :)

[–] nkk@programming.dev 20 points 1 day ago
[–] Ilandar@lemmy.today 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Use Soulseek (you don't have to use their app, there are alternatives like Nicotine+). Free yourself from a reliance on streaming platforms.

[–] dan@upvote.au 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If you have a home server, slskd is very good. Modern web UI and there's plugins to integrate it into Lidarr (Tubifarry)

[–] nevetsg@aussie.zone 1 points 9 hours ago

I have slskd running as a server but hate it's search function. I will have to investigate this Lidarr plugin.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 2 points 22 hours ago

X2. It can be a little janky because other people's naming conventions are terrible but it's a pretty great setup.

[–] GFGJewbacca@midwest.social 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

As soon as you said "Lidarr," you had my undivided attention. I'm definitely giving this a try

[–] dan@upvote.au 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Make sure you're on the "develop" branch of Lidarr, as the stable one doesn't have the plugins feature. If you're using Docker, use the "develop" tag instead of "latest" (lscr.io/linuxserver/lidarr:develop).

[–] GFGJewbacca@midwest.social 1 points 13 hours ago

I got mine through the TrueNAS app "store," which had plugins enabled. That made things easy.

[–] alakey@piefed.social 3 points 23 hours ago

fmhy.net for all your sailing needs.

[–] dan@upvote.au 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Usenet. Plenty of music in lossless (FLAC) format. Use NZBGeek and DrunkenSlug as indexers. Sabnzbd to download. Lidarr and Prowlarr to automate everything. Add an artist, click to download an album, and it'll search for the album, download the NZB file, send it to Sabnzbd to download, then tag and organize the files once it's done downloading.

For music I'd just get a block account: https://www.reddit.com/r/usenet/wiki/providerdeals/. Essentially, you pay for some amount of data (can usually get 1TB for US$5-15), and they usually don't have an expiry date, so it could last you for years. Some providers have monthly plans with unlimited data, but a block account will end up way cheaper if you just want music.

For rarer music, Soulseek is very good. It's a peer-to-peer service from the KaZaA and Napster era, but somehow it's survived until now. Since it's peer to peer, downloads are quite a bit slower (you're relying on the upload speed of individual users - each download comes from only one user) but it's a great community.

[–] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

Rutracker and a torrent client. It has loads of niche stuff. Use browser translate so you can read the website.

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

It's also supported by Prowlarr if you want to automate downloads using Lidarr.

Having said that, note that many uploads on rutracker are raw CD dumps (ISO file, plus a CUE file specifying when the tracks start and end) which Lidarr doesn't support directly, so you'll have to manually convert to FLAC and split it yourself. Once you do that, you can manually import the files into Lidarr and it'll tag and arrange the files for you.

[–] ex_06@slrpnk.net 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Do you happen to have a way to search without making an account?

[–] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 1 points 23 hours ago

No idea, sorry. I just used an email I set up for random stuff. TBF that email address doesn't get any spam and it's been a couple years since I signed up there.

[–] webkitten@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

Nicotine (soulseek) for rare stuff or live stuff is great; yt-dlp for popular stuff from popular music services. There's also ytDownloader for a GUI interface.

[–] LemonLicker999@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Soulseek and lucida.to are the best of the best

[–] Reznik@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait! lucida is still alive?

[–] LemonLicker999@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

No shot someone's tryna DDOS the site rn 💀 It's so childish

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 1 points 1 day ago

I normally use Deemix-GUI to download from Deezer, or fire up Nicotine.

[–] marci@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

I use tidal-dl-ng, simple python gui app you can compile yourself or even just run in the debugger.

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

i think orpheusdl works for deezer/tidal/qobuz. you can also try running your windows-based downloader program under wine, it might actually run really well

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fun fact: you can write a Bash script to run yt-dlp on a playlist without much scripting skill

[–] unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yt-dlp already supports downloading playlists. If it doesn't work for a specific site, you might as well write it in python and contribute it to yt-dlp directly, that way everyone else can benefit as well.

Mind you, yt-dlp has a strict policy against cracking DRM, so I have my doubts as to if it will work with Tidal in the first place.

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

yt-dlp has a strict policy against cracking DRM

This is how it stays legal in the USA. Bypassing DRM is a DMCA violation (section 1201), but just downloading content is totally legal.

Its predecessor, youtube-dl, was subject to DMCA takedowns from the RIAA, and they had to get the EFF to help. yt-dlp doesn't want to experience the same issues.