I've always wondered why software licenses tend to have a part written in ALL CAPS... now I finally understand, it's for the AI bots.
this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
25 points (90.3% liked)
TechTakes
2526 readers
84 users here now
Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.
This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.
For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Not sure if I should post it here or the stubsack, somebody went through the claude code https://neuromatch.social/@jonny/116324676116121930 (via @aliettedebodard.com and @olivia.science on bsky)
jonny's thread is sheer awesome
Morged.
Word of warning, there is a code download going round with mallware in it: https://www.theregister.com/2026/04/02/trojanized_claude_code_leak_github/
“Throw insane amounts of compute at some developer fan fiction and hope for the best.” is such a good description of vibe coding.
By far the dumbest "feature" in the codebase is this thing called "Buddy" (described in a few places such as here). Honestly, I don't really know what it's for or what the point is.
BUDDY - A Tamagotchi Inside Your Terminal
I am not making this up.
Claude Code has a full Tamagotchi-style companion pet system called "Buddy." A deterministic gacha system with species rarity, shiny variants, procedurally generated stats, and a soul description written by Claude on first hatch like OpenClaw.
...
On top of that, there's a 1% shiny chance completely independent of rarity. So a Shiny Legendary Nebulynx has a 0.01% chance of being rolled. Dang.
Great, so they were planning on a gacha system where you can get an ASCII virtual pet that, uhh, occasionally makes comments? Truly a serious feature for a serious tool for the serious discipline of software engineering. Imagine if IntelliJ decided to pull this bullshit.
But also, Claude Code is leaning hard into gambling addiction — the “Hooked” model. You reward the user with an intermittent, variable reward. This keeps them coming back in the hope of the big win. And it turns them into gambling addicts.
The Onion could not have come up with a better way to illustrate this very point.
You just gotta appreciate that the most deterministic part of the code base is the predatory lootbox system.
Even before this, I felt strongly that there was a big element of gambling in coding agents.
“Please fix this bug!”
“Big bucks, no wammies!”
The terms of use of anthropic (in Europe) explicitly call out non commercial use only on their pro plan.
So by their own admissions, it's not a serious tool for the serious discipline of software engineering. It's reserved for vibe coding only
So there’s a chance that Anthropic won’t be able to go after anyone with the Claude codebase because copyright laws?
I'd love to see it tested in court but I'm not gonna be the test case. GitHub won't touch it because the 'AI output is worthless' angle is bad news for MS.