this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
485 points (97.3% liked)

memes

21246 readers
1660 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de 115 points 1 month ago (9 children)

"Experiencing interruptions? Find out why" - Naah I'm fine dude, just take your time.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 95 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh no! The video is black for a few seconds instead of showing several ads for a minute! Whatever am I going to do???

[–] cobysev@lemmy.world 65 points 1 month ago (22 children)

Even if they keep the screen black for 30 second to a minute, I'd still gladly wait in silence than be subjected to advertisements.

If they ever make it impossible to watch videos without first watching ads, then I'll just leave the platform. I have no loyalty to YouTube and I'll sooner dump the platform and move on to other video sites than deal with enshittification and ads.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If they ever make it impossible to watch videos without first watching ads, then I’ll just leave the platform.

Yep. Then it will be time to finally start exploring peertube or something...

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

Oh that's why it says this? Guess I'll block this message too.

[–] arcine@jlai.lu 10 points 1 month ago

I'm watching a 4h video. I can wait 5 seconds for it to load 😂

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I’m fine with waiting 10 seconds at the beginning of a video. I wonder how much YouTube would save (by reducing bandwidth, smaller caches, choosing slower storage) if they didn’t have the goal to start the video virtually immediately.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 1 month ago
[–] OR3X@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (13 children)

The people say "just pay for premium" don't seem to understand that in the beginning YouTube was free and had no ads. When google purchased it they promised to keep it that way. Then they slowly started with ads. At first they were pretty unobtrusive banners, then a short skippable preroll then multiple preroll then unskippable preroll. The reason I refuse to pay for premium is because Google created this issue and is now selling the solution. I refuse to be a part of that. It has nothing to do with the creators.

[–] Pman@lemmy.org 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

ReVanced and Grayjay do the same thing but for free and are open source so long as Google keeps trying to engineer enshitification the proud people of the open source community will engineer a solution.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago

I would totally pay for youtube if it was even remotely decently priced.

You can get multiple concurrents on disney+, Hulu or Netflix with blockbuster content for the same price as youtube's slop filled premium family.

Seriously, the service is worth maybe $9 a month. I don't want their music, i won't use it, the quality is crap.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] pewpew@feddit.it 26 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I would pay if it was a quality service and not ran by clowns

[–] lauha@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

All oligarchs are clowns, but all clowns are not oligarchs

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

My favourite unexpected bonus from switching to Linux has been a completely ad free youtube experience. Not entirely sure why this magic is happening but I love it.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

On windows Firefox + ublock origin is an ad free experience for YouTube. Any chance you picked a browser that has ublock origin added hy default?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 month ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] bss03@infosec.pub 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You do you. I like my YT Premium. Many of the creators I watch there simply don't publish anywhere else, and I don't have time for ads, especially if I'm watching on my smart TV.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 13 points 1 month ago (4 children)

This used to be the case, but it's a different equation now. Ads used to be one or two per video. Fine, I get there are bills to pay.

Now it's pure greed and pushing us to a subscription for a service they purposely made shitty so we would think exactly what you are. 4-5 ads, with forced ads interrupting the videos, and auto redirects to more ads after the video fonishes. Unskippable multi-minute ads.

And if you're thinking "well then just pay for it", tell that to Netflix, Hulu, and all of the streaming services that were "ad-free" until they decided that actually, pay twice as much or watch ads (even though your paying).

So while I understand you're saying, you're assuming Google will play fair. They won't. They will up the price, they will still force ads, and it will get worse. I'm taking a stand now saying enough is enough. I'm not rewarding them for enshittifying the service.

[–] oppy1984 13 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Check out Nebula, it is paid but there are no ads and they have a decent amount of YouTubers and are adding more regularly.

Also your feed is based on subscriptions not an algorithm.

Oh don't worry, I'm there, I'll happily give money to them

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (5 children)
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

you know those FBI Warnings in front of a LEGALLY (they are removed by pirates on pirated movies) procured Movie? Those are scare screens.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Xylight 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

They're eventually gonna start banning accounts for this and then requiring login to view YouTube.

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I doubt they’ll ever actually do it, just threaten it constantly.

They’d rather have people without accounts, and/or using adblockers keep using the site. If they started actually cracking down, then it would create a significant pool of users who would use some other platform. They’d rather eat the losses of some people not viewing ads then push a significant amount of users to a potential competitor.

Much like how Microsoft hasn’t cracked down on unlicensed windows installs because it would push a significant amount of people to look for an alternative OS.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›