this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
112 points (99.1% liked)

Privacy

4616 readers
93 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Shameless@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No way will I ever be trusting any type of "age verification" methods, I would much rather just not use those services.

[–] far_university1990@reddthat.com 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Or make own. With blackjack and hooker.

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

A single hooker might be a tad too busy!

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Together with two other researchers, they set out to look into Persona, the San Francisco-based startup that’s used by Discord for biometric identity verification – and found a Persona frontend exposed to the open internet on a US government authorized server.

In 2,456 publicly accessible files, the code revealed the extensive surveillance Persona software performs on its users, bundled in an interface that pairs facial recognition with financial reporting – and a parallel implementation that appears designed to serve federal agencies.

The company that wants to collect and compile all of your most sensitive data can’t even protect its own source code. They know this surveillance isn’t safe, and they don’t care. They want the power it bestows.

[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

We need preemptive laws that prevent any identifying age checks.

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 2 points 2 months ago

I mean, it's laws that are causing them.