this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2026
41 points (93.6% liked)

Gaming

34402 readers
111 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jaennaet@sopuli.xyz 45 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

memory and storage shortages have created challenges for us

But hey, at least we're getting AI slop and the Trump regime can use Claude to decide which schoolchildren to bomb, that's good right?

… wait no what am I saying, that's fucking terrible

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 10 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

the Trump regime can use Claude to decide which schoolchildren to bomb

Not true in the slightest. Trump can't use Claude to decide which schoolchildren he can bomb.

He can use ChatGPT to decide which schoolchildren he can bomb.

(Anthropic was taken out back for saying they only wanted to identify which schoolchildren are there and not tell them which ones to bomb.)

[–] jaennaet@sopuli.xyz 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This contradicts, unsurprisingly, Trump telling Anthropic to go fuck itself and the subsequent deal with OpenAI.

In any case, my comment was being made in jest because Trump's admin is no stranger to violating policies, procedures, laws, and human rights.

[–] jaennaet@sopuli.xyz 11 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Oh yeah expecting fascists to be consistent is a losing game

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 4 points 8 hours ago

Oh no, Trump and Friends have been some of the most consistent people I have ever seen. Consistently awful and against all normal people maybe, but consistent

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

They suggested no such thing. "Early 2026" is still part of "this year"...

They literally just referred back to their previous post about the timeline.

We shared recently that there have been challenges with memory and storage shortages, but we will be shipping all three products this year. More updates will be shared as we finalize our plans.

This is just malicious clickbait.

[–] Eggyhead@lemmings.world 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Just to be fair, “Our goal of shipping all three products in the first half of the year has not changed” clearly states a goal and not a promise.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

What does that have to do with this conversation?

[–] Eggyhead@lemmings.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

OP opined that the wait might be longer, which isn’t false.

Furthermore, “We hope to ship in 2026, but…” specifically references 2026, and not the first half, which as I pointed out had only been referenced as their goal.

The first half of this year is still 2026, sure, but 2026 isn’t just the first half of this year. 2026 by itself is a whole year.

Do you see what this has to do with the conversation?

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

OP opined that the wait might be longer, which isn’t false.

No they didn't. They said Valve suggested it would be longer, which did not happen.

The first half of this year is still 2026, sure, but 2026 isn’t just the first half of this year. 2026 by itself is a whole year.

...and? You're reaching here. That is in no way any sort of suggestion.

Do you see what this has to do with the conversation?

No. No one said anything about a "promise", at any time. Not me, not the author, and not Valve. Only you.