Vintage early 2000s vibe ? What are you implying? Early 2000s was the era of mature lenses technology almost identical to the lenses we have today !! This was the era of the early dslr, not vintage lenses !!
Photography
c/photography is a community centered on the practice of amateur and professional photography. You can come here to discuss the gear, the technique and the culture related to the art of photography. You can also share your work, appreciate the others' and constructively critique each others work.
Please, be sure to read the rules before posting.
THE RULES
- Be nice to each other
This Lemmy Community is open to civil, friendly discussion about our common interest, photography. Excessively rude, mean, unfriendly, or hostile conduct is not permitted.
- Keep content on topic
All discussion threads must be photography related such as latest gear or art news, gear acquisition advices, photography related questions, etc...
- No politics or religion
This Lemmy Community is about photography and discussion around photography, not religion or politics.
- No classified ads or job offers
All is in the title. This is a casual discussion community.
- No spam or self-promotion
One post, one photo in the limit of 3 pictures in a 24 hours timespan. Do not flood the community with your pictures. Be patient, select your best work, and enjoy.
-
If you want contructive critiques, use [Critique Wanted] in your title.
-
Flair NSFW posts (nudity, gore, ...)
-
Do not share your portfolio (instagram, flickr, or else...)
The aim of this community is to invite everyone to discuss around your photography. If you drop everything with one link, this become pointless. Portfolio posts will be deleted. You can however share your portfolio link in the comment section if another member wants to see more of your work.
I started photography in the mid 00s with a D40 and moved to a D5300 in the 10s. My most beloved lens from that era was a Nikon 70-300mm VR FX AF-S f/4.5-5.6 G.
There isn't really an equivalent of that lens these days as it seems like everyone is making a 100-400 instead and those are generally bigger dimensionally and weight wise. That lens was not particularly sharp once you got out of the center, although it wasn't much of an issue for me thanks to the APS-C crop.
There are some lens designs that have been basically the same for decades now (hello Sigma DG DN) and are still excellent, but I wouldn't paint 00s glass as all being mature. I'm using a Tamron 150-500 these days on a Sony FF body and the Tamron focuses way faster, is sharper in the center and across the frame, has great bokah, and offers better micro contrast.
00s glass is in somewhat of a weird spot. It doesn't have as much "character" as the glass that came before it and it's also not as technically excellent as the glass that came after it. That said, it's pretty affordable these days and is completely useable to get great photos. I will say that photos, even taken with the D40, have held up really well.
As in, the shots that it produces feel very early 2000s in terms of the overall colour temperature and general "vibe" that it produces. Relax.
Where are those shots?
Nah really, I'd like to see some examples of said aesthetic to figure out if I can see it. If you don't want to post your own, store bough examples are fine, too.
The camera itself looks like it's from the early 2000s, cool buy!