technology

24211 readers

359 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

context@hexbear.net

SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net

gaycomputeruser@hexbear.net

Wakmrow@hexbear.net

SwitchyandWitchy@hexbear.net

How the Copilot hallucinated Christmas (archive.is)

submitted 3 weeks ago by trompete@hexbear.net to c/technology@hexbear.net

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Scaling up a recipe for a massive gathering is a common holiday practice in my Italian American family. I tried showing Copilot a recipe for stuffed mushrooms from Sip and Feast. It acknowledged that to go from a serving size of six to 14 would require multiplying each ingredient by about 2.3 times, but it usually only did a couple calculations before expecting me to do the rest or trying to move on to another topic by asking me a question. When it noticed the site had options for scaling up the recipe, it mistook the “2x” and “3x” buttons for plus and minus ones that would let me dial in exactly 14 servings, and kept insisting that’s what those buttons are for. They aren’t. Then, as a last-ditch effort, I asked it to just calculate each ingredient and spell it out for me in a document. Copilot told me it would, and then did nothing.

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] AernaLingus@hexbear.net 15 points 3 weeks ago

Emphasis mine:

I’m inclined to think [the use of fictional company Relecloud] here points to all these advertised Copilot actions being simulated, but a Microsoft rep insists that’s not the case. Nicci Trovinger, general manager of Windows marketing, tells The Verge, “All Copilot responses are actual responses Copilot gave to the scenarios shown and questions asked at a point in time. Responses were shortened for brevity to fit the length of the creative spot, in line with standard advertising practices.”

"A point in time" could mean literally anything. You could have edited 100 hours of prompting down to 30 seconds and that would still technically be true. Holy fucking shit I hate advertisers :bill-hicks-marketing:

[–] microfiche@hexbear.net 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I get the sentiment but good grief multiply by two and add a little extra. It's hot food not physics.

[–] trompete@hexbear.net 23 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Idk if you read the article but Microsoft literally had Copilot do this exact thing in their Christmas ad. The author didn't come up with this scenario, Microsoft's marketing bozos did. The author tested all the scenarios from the ad and it failed at all of them.

[–] microfiche@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah. I read it.