49
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 73 points 10 months ago

They were the same species on the same planet just a few thousand years ago, which is the blink of an eye in evolutionary terms.

It might be more accurate to say that Vulcans are just Romulans with impulse control. Before the split, Vulcans were more like modern Romulans than modern Vulcans. Vulcans at that time were highly emotional and violent. Then they had a sort of cultural revolution, which involved controlling emotions and focusing on logic. This led to some traditionalists leaving Vulcan and founding Romulus, carrying that emotional and violent culture with them.

[-] Izzy@startrek.website 24 points 10 months ago

It's curious that despite this cultural revolution that led to founding of planet Vulcan they are still basically equals technologically. It doesn't appear that a few thousand years of excess emotion and violent tendencies has been at all detrimental to Romulan technological advances.

[-] aebletrae@hexbear.net 14 points 10 months ago

Their physiology is barely diverged so their intellects are likely to remain similar. Espionage is frequently the theme of Romulan encounters, which would help keep them up to date. And if they procreate more frequently than every seven years, they might have a much larger population even with greater murderousness, with more people being advantageous for tech development.

[-] Flyberius@hexbear.net 14 points 10 months ago

They also have an empire with a large number of client species. Vulcan does not. If anything the romulans are more advanced than the Vulcans

[-] essellburns@beehaw.org 8 points 10 months ago

It's well known that Vulcans are the intellectual puppets of the federation.

Maybe that limited them?

[-] TiKa444@feddit.de 4 points 10 months ago

May it's a question of the focus. You almost only see the military technology of the romulans.

[-] Wooster@startrek.website 19 points 10 months ago

It’s kinda odd in retrospect. There are many words to describe Romulans… but violent isn’t really amongst the top ten.

[-] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

Gene Roddenberry envisaged the Romulans as Star Trek’s version of Communist China and the Klingons as its Soviet Union. In Making of Star Trek, he and Stephen Whitfield describe the Romulans as “highly militaristic, aggressive by nature, ruthless in warfare.

That's from the man himself. Not sure where you got the impression that romulans aren't violent.

[-] Wooster@startrek.website 20 points 10 months ago

I’m familiar with that part of the lore.

It’s more like how the Borg are described as an unstoppable unrelenting all powerful force… and are stopped, relent, and are devoid of power. On paper they are one thing, on screen they are another.

With the Romulans, they tend to outsource the violence. Pit party A against B, then clean up after. Practically scavengers. Klingons, Jem’Hadar, and Hirogen I’d more readily describe as violent.

[-] ryan@the.coolest.zone 23 points 10 months ago

You bring up a good point. It feels like Romulans have also learned to control their violent emotions, but rather than suppress them entirely that energy is just focused all into tactics and smarter ways to be ruthless.

[-] JWBananas@startrek.website 6 points 10 months ago

Does that make Vulcan Taiwan?

[-] STUPIDVIPGUY@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

When I think of the Romulans, I first think of that time they plotted to bomb DS9 to gain control over the wormhole only to be thwarted by time-traveling O'Brien

[-] VindictiveJudge@startrek.website 16 points 10 months ago

I think the police state was their solution to infighting in much the same way that Surak's faction took up a quasi-religious adherence to logic.

[-] LostAndSmelly@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

That's pretty much it.

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 5 points 10 months ago

Yes. They're the ones that said 'fuck this' to Surak

this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
49 points (96.2% liked)

Star Trek

10506 readers
7 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


New to Star Trek and wondering where to start?


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episodes, as well as previews for upcoming episodes. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
05-23 DSC 5x09 "Lagrange Point"
05-30 DSC 5x10 "Life, Itself"
07-01 PRO S2 Index
10-24 LD 5x01 TBA
10-24 LD 5x02 TBA

Episode Discussion Archive


In Production

Lower Decks (2024-10-24)

Strange New Worlds (2025)

Section 31 (2025)

Starfleet Academy (TBA)

In Development

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.


Allied Discord Server


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS