Why did Trump go to Epstein's Island so much? Curious
this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
1359 points (99.4% liked)
AntiTrumpAlliance
962 readers
42 users here now
About
An alliance among all who oppose Donald Trump's actions, positions, cabinet, supporters, policies, or motives. This alliance includes anyone from the left or the right; anyone from any religion or lack thereof; anyone from any country or state; any man, woman or child.
Rules
-No pro-Trump posts or comments
-No off topic posts
-Be civil
-No trolling
-Follow Lemmy terms of service
Social Media
Other Communities
!desantisthreatensusa@lemmy.world
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Because he was one of the ringleaders in the human trafficking.... He wasn't just in the list like some filthy fucking casual, he was management.
I doubt it. This was a sucessful enterprise
That would require work, Trump has not worked day in his life. He was regular customer and investor.
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
That's only because all their names appear in those files. Fuck every cowardly republican there
Voted Aye
McGovern (D-MA), Scanlon (D-PA), Neguse (D-CO), Leger Fernández (D-NM), Norman (R-SC)
Voted No
Fischbach (R-MN), Roy (R-TX), Houchin (R-IN), Langworthy (R-NY), Scott (R-GA), Griffith (R-VA), Jack (R-GA), Foxx (R-NC)
Wow, so Norman is the only Republican on the committee who isn't a pedophile?
In all fairness, the others may just be pedophile conspirators.🤷🏻♂️
Could also be plausible deniability—voting for it knowing full well that it will be blocked anyway.
load more comments
(2 replies)
It means they had the votes for a performative opposition vote and Norman was the most needing
No. That just means his name wasn’t on the list. Maybe he didn’t need Jeffrey Epstein’s help to fuck kids.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Why do I immediately assume that dude from South Carolina has already announced he isn't seeking reelection?
load more comments
(2 replies)
I don't fully understand American politics so why did only 13 people vote on this?
If I understand correctly this was a committee that was voting on pushing the GENIUS act forward so that it could then go on to the larger vote that would actually determine whether it became law.
The Democrats in this committee tried to add an amendment that required the release of the Epstein files so the vote was on the changes to the bill which the Republicans voted no and will just go on fox news to complain about Democrats not using the proper channels of legislation to get what they want.
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
The GOP has proudly stood behind wealthy pedophiles for decades ... It's kind of their thing
While pointing their fingers at everyone else. DO NOT let them forget this. Ever.
WWMGT do? That's what Dems should be doing right now. Except in this case, an insane reaction is the only sane response. Honestly fucking disgusting and somebody needs to be circulating an image with the name listed of every members that voted to not release those files.
Edit: Gotta say Newsweek has been one of the most upfront and honest news outlets over the last few months when it comes to just reporting the information and headlines everyone else seems afraid to just come out and say.
But they spend so much time saying that's not true. I love this for them. They had a chance to prove it's "not true" and epically failed because it is so very very true. Now the masses are moving the goal post saying it never mattered anyways... Le sigh... Le boo...
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
Incoming hypocrisy!
"We'd gladly release it, but the method chosen was not appropriate. It should be voted on as a separate matter not as an amendment to the matter at hand."
Continues to use reconciliation packages to vote on GOP spending wishlists that can avoid a filibuster instead of the appropriate methods...
The “method chosen” means “my name needs redacted first”.
Wait, but I thought they didn't exist! Remember how Trump said if those files got released it could destroy a lot of people?
Trump only gives a shit about himself. He means that the information would destroy him
I think in this case he gives a shit about a lot more people too. As we have seen with the murder of Epstein, there is powerful people who don't shy away from murder involved. Furthermore there is reason to believe that the whole thing is an Israeli intelligence blackmail operation. If that is true, it would be an existential threat for all Zionist lobby organizations and individuals in the US and they would go completely ballistic on everyone and everything
load more comments
(1 replies)
We will not release the client list that does not exist.
It's the DEMONRATS Fault that REPUBLICANS blocked this! the DEMONRATS are the Pedophiles even though REPUBLICANS are the Ones BENDING OVER BACKWARDS to PROTECT Jeffrey Epstein!
Um, it's too late to protect Epstein.
We need to protect the sanctity of the OFFICE of the Epstein, obviously not the literal Epstein who JUST coincidentally must be protected to protect the office itself.
load more comments
(8 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
If you can’t get it out legally, just do it illegally. What are they going to do, kill the leaker? They are already killing people anyway so there’s no safety in waiting.
load more comments
(5 replies)
Their crusade for Hunter's laptop must have burned out their justice gland.
The kids being held in ICE facilities are the US president’s fuck dolls. Not only is he a failed businessman, rapist and conman, but he’s also a child molester! What a wonderful representation of America!
load more comments
(3 replies)
Gotta protect the rapists and pedos. It's the republican way. Is there really anything that isn't just absolutely rotten in this political party?
load more comments
(1 replies)
Gang
Of
Pedophiles
How long until they drop the age of consent to 0. We know exactly where they stand on that.
load more comments
(4 replies)
This is disgusting and entirely predictable. The US has bipartisan consensus on pedophilia. Neither party will release the files because both parties are involved in raping children.
load more comments
(1 replies)
The Republican party is up there with Islam and Catholic church as the most children loving organisation.
Why did they block something that doesn’t exist?
Where's a whistleblower when you need one?
EDIT:
From reddit.... https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/s/eBjDX0zt07
Here are the Epstein Files. For those of you who have seen this comment before, my apologies. I am trying to keep this information alive. Please feel free to share. Contact me if you want provenance.
https://joshwho.net/EpsteinList/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1320.0-combined.pdf (verified court documents)
https://joshwho.net/EpsteinList/black-book-unredacted.pdf (verified pre-Bondi) Trump is on page 85, or pdf pg. 80
Trump’s name is circled. The circled individuals are the ones involved in the trafficking ring according to the person who originally released the book. These people would be “The List “ Here is the story.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsiKUXrlcac
—————————other Epstein Information
https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson/_TrumpEpstein/_Calif/_Lawsuit.pdf here’s a court doc of Epstein and Trump raping a 13 yr old together.
Some people think this claim is a hoax. Here is Katies testimony on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnib-OORRRo
load more comments
(4 replies)
The files were too woke probably /s
haven't you heard the new talking points from russia? releasing the files literally would force the US Gov. to open a publishing house, and print and distribute millions of copies of child sex abuse images quarterly!! Clutch your pearls!!!
load more comments
(3 replies)
view more: next ›