this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
527 points (95.4% liked)

Canada

8766 readers
2131 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 17 points 8 hours ago

nuclear subs always give me gundam carrier ship vibes

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 63 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

JT was just in France as one of his last acts as PM. Mere days later this bad boy shows up in a Halifax harbour. πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€” Merci a la belle France πŸ‡«πŸ‡·πŸ€πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦

[–] Isaac@waterloolemmy.ca 10 points 5 hours ago

Vive la France!

[–] beejboytyson@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago
[–] boke@sh.itjust.works 129 points 15 hours ago (7 children)

This isn’t a show of force, it’s a demonstration for Canada who is planning to buy a number of these submarines from France.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 22 minutes ago

I mean, they're not mutually exclusive. Nobody was about to start openly threatening the Americans, but having French forces around and mulling over defence deals with France sends a signal.

We don't know what Macron and Trudeau talked about, but accelerating things like this in light of the new reality could well have been part of it.

[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 56 points 15 hours ago

You're right, thanks for adding context. I'm immediately suspicious when a picture is posted with no accompanying news article, and my search wasn't turning up any articles, only social media links.

Here's a French article about it.

[–] yannic@lemmy.ca 12 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Yes, this old news is about a nuclear-powered attack submarine, not necessarily a submarine that can nuclear-attack.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 22 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Australia watching on with regret.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 6 points 2 hours ago

right?! gawwwwwwd we’re so fucking captured

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 16 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Morrison is such a dickhead.

[–] Gronk@aussie.zone 10 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Morrison knew what he was doing, the sub deal was to poison the chalice before Labor gained the majority.

Unfortunately for the walking sack of salmonella and shitty curry, his wrangler (Murdoch) managed to sway the election enough to get the LNP back in power.

I have actually met Morrison in person once (friends of friends of friends) and he is a fucking moron but JFC he's at least a brain cell or two ahead of Dutton

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I dunno .. Dutton seems smarter, but more evil. Morrison just seems like a brainwashed idiot who's failed upwards. I don't know how anyone looks at the screaming void of evil that is Dutton and thinks "yeah that thing has my best interests at heart .. or a heart"

[–] Gronk@aussie.zone 4 points 1 hour ago

They're just two different flavours of evil, Morrison is a happy clapper pentecostalist "God favours the rich" evil and Dutton is an ex-corrupt cop who wants authoritarianism under his rule evil.

They both don't have the critical thinking to realise the damage they do or why men like them shouldn't hold positions of power, but Dutton following right out of Trumps playbook despite international backlash is a pretty good case for dumb-as-fuck syndrome.

But I agree, it's absurd that we have these stooges running for parliament I don't know how we got here..

[–] Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I'm still not entirely sure how Australia seemingly wound up with a modified Westminster system that was worse than the original, genuinely pretty impressive.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Arguably at least we have proportional representation. FPTP sucks.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 2 hours ago

at least we have proportional representation

Only in the Senate. And only on a per-state basis, so it's only as proportional as "a proportion of 6" can be...which is much less proportional than a proportion of 40, like if the Senate were done nationally.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

We knew that BEFORE the election and yet elected the LNP anyway, fuck voters.

[–] AmosBurton_ThatGuy@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 hours ago

Could be worse, you could be a murican α••( ᐛ )α•—

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ShakingMyCane@lemmy.ca 123 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

France manages to get a sub to us before the UK even deigns to comment. That says it all. Merci beacoup!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] myersguy@lemmy.simpl.website 107 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 96 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (6 children)

Hijacking the top comment to let people know this isn't in response to any American threats, this is Naval Group, a French naval defense company, showing off their submarine because Canada is looking to spend 60 billion on twelve submarines. The plans for this purchase were publicly announced on July 10, 2024.

Here's a French news article about the submarine, seeing as I couldn't seem to find any sources in English.

[–] bettylaw@lemm.ee 1 points 45 minutes ago

I had real good tingle feels imagining France showing up on our coast during this part of history.
A real β€œwe got you bro” moment in my imagination.

Le sad.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 11 points 8 hours ago

Naval Group, a French naval defense company

Ah shit, that's the same company Australia had a deal with to buy diesel subs, before our fuckwit former PM reneged on the deal to create AUKUS and buy American nuclear subs.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 35 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I'll take both reasons as canon, thank you very much

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 73 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Could have imagined this happening as little as 3 years ago.

An ally sending a nuclear deterrent into our waters as a message/warning to the US. This normally happens to countries like Iran or North Korea

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 10 points 10 hours ago

Still hasn’t happened. This was a sales pitch for a Canadian defence contract.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 44 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Hey. Guess what? At the moment, we're the bad guys...

[–] XenGi@feddit.org 28 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

At the moment? When was there ever a time the US weren't the bad guys?

[–] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub 24 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Briefly the us was the good guys when we killed a bunch of slavers and then when we killed a bunch of fascists. Those were exceptions to the rule though.

[–] starshipHighwayman69@lemmy.ml 14 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Looks at founding fathers... Yeah killed the slavers. Puts blanket over Native Indians. Hides Chinese rail workers under rug. Renames Irish "Indentured workers"

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 hours ago

They also killed the Nazis, except for the ones that were useful, of course.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 15 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

To be accurate, this is a nuclear propelled attack submarine. It does not carry nuclear warheads and is not what we normally call a "nuclear deterrent".

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 points 6 hours ago

I believe you, but do you have a source? That's a pretty big distinction when you're calling it a "nuclear attack submarine"!

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 49 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Let's go! France is here to protect Canada!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 37 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Would a french submarine wear its hat like this:

or like this:

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 hours ago

The top one looks like he got hit on the head.

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 18 points 15 hours ago

Asking the real questions

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Finally. Letting the French keep a little bit of Canada pays off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (7 children)

The scale of these things is always fascinating. They're always much larger than I think they are.

For reference, I think that's a Suffren class, making it just shy of 100m, or a tad longer than a football field for my fellow Americans.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The previously-mentioned French article says it's a Barracuda, but I don't know if that's a model or a class.

And unsurprisingly, he also decided to offer the Royal Canadian Navy its "premium" model, the Barracuda, rather than the Scorpène.

The Barracuda is (apparently) an export variant of the Suffren and is indeed a little shorter but still over 300 ft long.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί