117
So why did they win? (lemmy.sdf.org)
submitted 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) by HorseRabbit@lemmy.sdf.org to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

The majority of Americans who voted, at least in the swing states, have voted for the republicans. Why? Do the republican policies reflect popular opinion? Or is it that their vibes are more aligned with the public? Or maybe people are worse off now than they were 4 years ago and are hoping to turn back time? As a non-american I don't quite get it. People must think their lives will materially improve under the republicans, but why?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 18 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

The tendency for the rate of profit to fall.

I mean, yeah, it looks like Kamala didn’t get the dem base out to vote for her because no one wants “more of the same” when following an incredibly unpopular president. Kamala was very openly telling the base to fuck off, and made her race singularly about attracting white, upper middle class suburban women at the cost of everyone else.

But that’s the micro view. In the macro view, Michael Roberts’ analysis of rates of profit shows it’s been falling for a while now. Capitalism was in crisis during the Great Depression, only to be “saved” by WW2. The reconstruction of the industrial world led to good times for a couple decades until there was a profitability crisis in the 1970s. Capital’s response starting the 80s was offshoring, privatization, and financialization - neoliberalism in other words. But the gains from that was only able to keep things going until 2009 or so. Since then profitability has been shit. Capital has no answers beyond just tightening the screws (austerity at home and imperialism abroad). Just increasing misery in order to slow the decline of the rate of profit.

The US needs that surplus value extracted primarily from the global south to keep running. That surplus value is how capital is able to buy off the domestic working class. But that slice of the pie keeps shrinking, i.e. material conditions keep worsening. Things are getting worse as every year goes by and everyone knows it, even if they don’t understand it. That’s why we keep bouncing between parties every four years instead of the steady 2 term presidents we had in the era of neoliberalism. Most people are not doing in depth political analysis. They are just seeing their situation get worse and blaming whoever is in charge.

Of course the economy won’t recover under Trump. It will almost certainly get worse, and I happen to think the odds of a major economic crisis are pretty high. I would bet everything we get a dem president in 2028. Things just get worse and people are fumbling around for a solution.

And that’s where we come in. WE HAVE THE ANSWERS. It’s our job to bring the light of Marxism to the world. I’m not even gonna pretend we can make much of a dent in 4 years but this is a multi-generational project.

[-] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 31 points 5 hours ago

The real story here is that Trump won the popular vote. That signals an enormous shift in sentiment and culture, and should be the subject of any serious analysis here. This is nothing less than a catastrophic failure of the liberal project and liberal vision--a total implosion of the do-nothing "centrist" political consensus. Democrats have shown over and over and over again that they have nothing to offer the majority of Americans. The Harris campaign was just the apotheosis of the trend: courting capital and neo-conservative ghouls while jettisoning any talk of policies that might help people. This is not a winning election strategy. That should be screamingly obvious now. People are angry, hurting, and looking for anyone that even suggests they understand that pain and might do something about it, even when the suggested solutions make no sense. The only sane response to this result is a SWEEPING reexamination of the neo-liberal consensus. Liberalism in its current form has failed most people, and the Democrats have failed to articulate any message or position that appreciates that. Until someone in the United States starts articulating a positive vision with policies to engender some hope for the future--healthcare for everyone, housing as a human right, SERIOUS action on climate change--the far right will keep winning. They're the only ones with ideas.

[-] LaughingLion@hexbear.net 18 points 4 hours ago

On the other side of that coin is that the voting base literally just collapsed from under the Democrats. They really went full on, "no more half measures" when it came to the left and abandoned any attempt to even lie about progressive leftist political values.

Liberals will blame this loss on the left and they are correct to do so. It is the left's fault because that is how electoral politics work. You didn't court their vote and they didn't vote for you. Cause and effect.

[-] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 5 points 3 hours ago

I don't really see this as being the other side of the coin at all. Their voter base collapsed precisely because they failed to articulate any kind of positive vision or embrace any policies that might help the vast majority of Americans. People will not turn out to vote for you when you explicitly tell them you're not going to help them and that they should stop whining.

[-] LaughingLion@hexbear.net 2 points 2 hours ago

It is the other side of the coin of Trump winning the popular vote. That is precisely part of that dynamic. He also lost votes overall from last election. The Democrats lost so much more for the reasons you mention which are the reasons I mentioned. We must be clear when mentioning Trump won the popular vote, that Harris LOST so much more than that. She lost votes they would have previously gotten without picking up any from the Republicans (she actually lost about half a percent there as well!).

[-] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 16 points 4 hours ago

The real story here is that Trump won the popular vote.

Second time the Democrats lost the popular vote since 1992. Most likely, the Democrats will shift even more right. They shifted right after getting stomped in 1988.

[-] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 7 points 3 hours ago

Yeah it would not surprise me at all if they took exactly the wrong lesson from this, but I think doing so would make it crystal clear that they're not operating in anything like good faith. The percentage of Republicans who voted for Harris was totally unchanged from the percentage who voted for Biden, and the traditional Democratic base just didn't vote for them. The rightward shift overwhelmingly hurt their electoral performance. If they move even further to the right, that's just an indication that they actually believe in those policies; they won't be able to hide behind the fig leaf of "strategic triangulation" anymore. Most of us here on Hexbear are aware of the fact that they actually want to feed immigrants and poor people into a meat grinder, but I'm at least hopeful that this might be the beginning of more ordinary people waking up to that fact.

[-] SpookyGenderCommunist@hexbear.net 33 points 5 hours ago

Because it's less a matter of more people voting republican and more a matter of not enough people voting Democrat.

Why did people not vote Democrat? The party refuses to be popular, had no real policy proposals, and actively alienated key voting blocks in key swing States.

[-] soy_disantra@hexbear.net 29 points 5 hours ago
  1. Really hard to run an attack campaign when you're the incumbent party. If your messaging is just "im a bit better than the other guy" people are just gonna point to the shit job you're doing right now. Historical levels of unpopularity is real hard to come back from, bush needed 9/11.
  2. The whole Biden debacle was disastrous, probably ended any chance of scooping up the moderate vote they were desperately pining for.
  3. Gaza, immigration, and generally running to the right put a bullet in any chance of bringing this campaign back. They tried really desperately with the weed stuff at the last minute, but the damage was done.
  4. Democratic party reeks of putrescene
[-] Zuzak@hexbear.net 14 points 4 hours ago

When you run on the status quo, and the status quo sucks, people are gonna turn to whoever manages to present themselves as an alternative.

When you run to the right on stuff like immigration and the military, and the people who like right-wing policies already have a party waiting on them hand-and-foot, they're not gonna switch over to you, and you're just going to alienate the parts of your base/coalition that are affected by those policies.

People are gonna blame the left or say it's because she's a woman of color. But Tammy Baldwin, a queer woman, looks set to win Wisconsin, and Elissa Slotkin is ahead by a hair in Michigan, so that narrative is dead in the water.

[-] thisismyrealname@hexbear.net 48 points 6 hours ago

there are 50 reasons and all of them boil down to the democratic party's refusal to be popular. at this point the party is run by committed neocons and centrists who despite knowing that progressive policy is popular (let alone morally correct) will never campaign on it. whatever organized left exists in this country must break with the democrats if there is any hope for the future

[-] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today 19 points 5 hours ago

We need to stop calling them centrists.

The majority of Americans support raising the minimum wage, universal healthcare, and decreasing war & the military industrial complex. They aren't centrists, they're corporatists.

Otherwise, this ^ is totally the right answer. We now have republicans and store-brand republicans. So people choose the regular republicans.

[-] HumanBehaviorByBjork@hexbear.net 12 points 5 hours ago

Because left-of-center people -- not even "leftists" mind you, just people who broadly want to Improve Society Somewhat -- were told loud and clear by the Harris campaign that their support wasn't needed, so they stayed home. It's still too early to show this definitively, but I believe the final results will bear this out.

[-] ItalianMessiah@hexbear.net 21 points 6 hours ago

All good points but something that I don't see talked about more is how many Reps voted Early/Absentee this election. In 2020, early voting was 44% Dem with 30% Rep . In 2024, the percentages were almost dead even. I think Democrats saw the early voting results and wrongly assumed that they'd overwhelming go Dem because they did in the past. Because of this, Democrats were expecting a blue surge at the end to help balance out red votes early in the night. This did not materialize.

Other than that, it's a million small things that any competent campaign could've avoided. Don't alienate the Muslim community, hammer actual policy positions in your questions, have an actual primary instead of a rigged process, etc etc.

[-] BRINGit34@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 6 hours ago

Honestly this is why.

"Things were cheaper under trump" which is sort of true.

Sure there are the extremities of the republican party who are deadset on abortions or trans people or whatever but I promise the majority that vote republican do so because things were cheaper under trump.

Political discussion in America is not very nuanced

[-] REgon@hexbear.net 78 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

The democrats' main pitch was: We are doing a shitty job, but the other team will be worse.
The republicans' main pitch was: They are doing a shitty job, we wont.

Democrats main offer was doing what the republicans did. Why go for a cheap knockoff that's only in it for the votes, when you can get genuine homemade rabid racism? The democrats have nothing to offer and they're not even willing to admit shit is fucked. Republicans have lots of stuff to offer: Fascism and they are willing to admit shit is fucked (because of immigrants, not the rich)
If you're an average voter and your choice is between someone offering to do genocide while denying it and someone offering to do genocide while enjoying it, then the average voter (who is a fascist) will go for the ones who are open about it.

On top of that the democrats method of campaigning via smug condescention and veiled threats does not do them any favours. Pointing at a graph and saying "you don't get it, inflation is going down!" (which just means it's going up slower) to a person who has to choose between paying utilities or eating every day, isn't a good idea if you want that person to vote for you.

It also doesn't help that democrats do anything they can to kneecap their own strong grassroots movements (See: Bernie Sanders being fucked over in the primaries two elections in a row, the dems turning on #metoo, the dems marginalising the BLM activists that won them georgia in 2020)

[-] Runcible@hexbear.net 34 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Republicans have lots of stuff to offer: Fascism and they are willing to admit shit is fucked (because of immigrants, not the rich)

I think you can go simpler than this, or rather I don't think fascism necessarily has broad appeal. It's the same take I have from when they kept trying to rail against "populism" At the end of the day when everything is fucked up but the system is "working as intended" people have a lot of motivation to want change. It may not be likely they'll get what they want but staying the course is pretty clearly a disaster.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Frank@hexbear.net 32 points 8 hours ago

I do wonder what happened with the "Your husband will know if you voted or not, but he won't know who you voted for" letters, like what the effect was. Bc to me they really looked like some kind of threat and I wonder some of hte recipients interpreted it as a confusing threat to narc on their husbands.

[-] Tabitha@hexbear.net 22 points 7 hours ago

I'm very confused about it, it feels to me like somebody is planning to leak a database of who voted for who (which is suppose to be impossible but that's easy to lie about), very ominous shit either way.

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 24 points 7 hours ago

Apparently what it was supposed to be was "It's safe to a vote for a democrat because your GOP husband can't check your voting record to see who you voted for."

[-] foxontherocks@hexbear.net 11 points 6 hours ago

at the same time though, libs were claiming their canvassers were asking the GOP men in households to speak to their democrat voting wives and getting rebuffed.

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 4 points 4 hours ago

That seems like it would make things worse?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fart@hexbear.net 8 points 5 hours ago

people want their pre covid life back

[-] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 25 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Honestly, it's difficult for me to mind meld into a republican. Their messaging always sounds to me like "shit sucks and it's supposed to suck. I want you to go fuck yourself and live a life full of toil as I tighten the screws because I want to profit off of it! I do not want to know what other cultures are like." And then they all start cheering wildly. Their boogeymen make my skin crawl. I don't see a lot of trans people and blue haired feminists causing civil unrest. I think generally messaging and education enable people to say that feminists want a choice and a fair shot. Not that you should even endeavor to be seen as acceptable through their lens; in my experience that's an intractable fool's game that becomes a barrier to living a life full of that which you find important. In addition I am simply stupified that the Dems can take the torch for the border wall and take the project higher and still the Republicans call Dems the party of illegal immigrants. That should be your crown jewel as a country of ashes and cruelty. Then of course you have your firm base of racism and sexism - they'd codify men and women can't be friends + you were assigned one at birth" on day 1 if they could.

But what I do know is how to fucking hate liberals. You can build a house on that shit. I can even conceive of the right wing attack as well. You get all the WEF "eat ze bugs" rhetoric where they're trying to put you in cages and allow you to scream in the Amazon mindfulness cubes. They think you're the party of HR and big tech (spiderman pointing at spiderman). They think you're the warhawk who wants to babysit the middle east (sometimes, other times they also want to). You'd hate how INCREDIBLY corrupt they are; their messaging is like a sponsorship from a big company that you hate (spiderman pointing at spiderman). They siphon everything nice for themselves and they (spidey senses) cheat at the stock market. I bet all sorts of foul shit happened in Ukraine. I bet all sorts of shit happened with Diddy and Epstein. I bet foul shit of both types is still happening.

So I could comprehend doing a harm reduction by being a republican if I never knew about socialism and still hated the libs. I could never imagine in a million years being excited because my boss is going to save so much money by dumping shit into rivers.

[-] Dessa@hexbear.net 9 points 5 hours ago

I don't see a lot of trans people and blue haired feminists causing civil unrest.

sicko-wistful

[-] AmericaDelendaEst@hexbear.net 78 points 9 hours ago

Because the democrats have done nothing but piss on people and tell them it's golden rain for 4 years, then campaign on "that guy will piss on you harder" while actively courting that guy's main supporters instead of getting votes from people who don't want to be pissed on

[-] JayTreeman@hexbear.net 55 points 8 hours ago

This was a referendum on biden. People don't like him. They voted him out, and at every opportunity Harris showed that besides the gender, age and race, they were the same person

[-] SerLava@hexbear.net 58 points 7 hours ago

What will you do differently? "Oh I don't know lol, I'll have a republican in my cabinet!" Lmao

[-] GenderIsOpSec@hexbear.net 42 points 7 hours ago

"Oh I don't know lol, I'll have a republican in my cabinet!"

"Those other guys are horrible fascists who want to keep abortion illegal and make democracy history! Also I'll have one of those horrible fascists in my cabinet!"

what a great message you're sending, really

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Midnight_Pearl@hexbear.net 26 points 7 hours ago

i don't think it's that republican policies reflect popular opinion but rather that popular opinion has turned against voting because it doesn't fix anything

[-] Blockocheese@hexbear.net 24 points 6 hours ago

Anecdotally, my exs mom, a Black Muslim woman who voted dem for everything, decided in like 2021? That she's never voting dem again because she was pissed about them not relieving student loan debt for her masters

Can't even imagine how many votes were lost for supporting genocide

[-] Dessa@hexbear.net 11 points 5 hours ago

And the thing is, if Trump wanted to cancel student loans, he would just cancel them, get them off the books, and dare his enemies to put the public back in debt. All this talk of "Oh we can't because the courts" just sounds like loser talk

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
117 points (98.3% liked)

chapotraphouse

13506 readers
1415 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS