720
submitted 3 months ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 252 points 3 months ago

She needs to still show up as scheduled, say that just because trump won't make time for the American people doesn't mean she will ignore them

Either he takes the bait and shows up, or she dominates the news cycle now, before the debate, during the debate, and after it

The whole time trump won't be able to talk about anything besides the debate and how it's not "fair".

It's the common sense move, so I'll be surprised to see it, but I hope they do.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 121 points 3 months ago

Make it a town hall. We really do need to hear questions and answers of serious topics now that the clown has left the big top.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 47 points 3 months ago

This is a far better option. Holding a debate without the other candidate is fodder for Trump to do the same on ONN or Fox News. But holding a town hall and inviting Trump as an optional attendee would create engagement, and either Trump will ignore it, join the same one, or hold his own and most likely screw up his own.

Win, win, win.

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 months ago

He'd hold his own to a "town" of handpicked shills.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

"Mr. Trump, people are saying immigrants are flooding across our borders to eat our pets before receiving sexual reassignment surgery in prison. Do you have a concept of a plan how to deal with this?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gork@lemm.ee 28 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The moderator should also ask the empty podium the same question they just asked Harris, with a brief pause to emphasize that he is a no-show.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

it's not like the filming of empty podiums is ahistorical.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 189 points 3 months ago

Reminder.

Back before the 2016 Conventions Trump challenged Bernie Sanders to a debate. Bernie jumped at the chance and Cadet Bonespurs had to run away from his own challenge.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/no-show-trump-now-says-debate-sanders-would-be-inappropriate-n581826

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 87 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Trump is on tape telling people in the room that the only person he's afraid of is Sanders.

Fast forward to now and he's apparently added Harris to that list. It's beautiful.

[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 61 points 3 months ago

Bernie can control a room on power of pure charisma, force of personality and personal authority in a way few people are capable of. Just watch his Fox News town hall.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 29 points 3 months ago

That’s a weird way to spell “objectively good policy.”

[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 54 points 3 months ago

His policies are obviously great, we all know this. But you can't go into a hostile environment like a Fox News Town Hall and completely dominate proceedings on policy alone.

[-] Hayduke@lemmy.world 140 points 3 months ago

Brave Sir Donald ran away. Bravely ran away away!

[-] Plum@lemmy.world 48 points 3 months ago
[-] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 65 points 3 months ago

When danger reared its ugly head, he cravenly turned his tail and fled

[-] MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yes, brave Sir Donald turned about and gallantly, he chickened out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 105 points 3 months ago
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 77 points 3 months ago

"Rejects"

Retreats in fear

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 27 points 3 months ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SlippiHUD@lemmy.world 72 points 3 months ago

I get use this image nearly daily.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 64 points 3 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 61 points 3 months ago

with Harris’ team unsuccessfully pushing for both candidates’ microphones to stay on even when it was not their turn to answer.

Wait a minute, Harris' team was the one pushing for always-on mics? That's actually such a flex lol.

[-] pingveno@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

Not really. It was always her tactic to make him go nuts. Provoking him into shouting over her would have gone along with that and just made him look bad.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

I think it would have been a smart choice. The rationale behind muting was trying to force both parties to having a nice, civil discussion, to force decorum upon the proceedings that formerly was just a given, but generally not respected by Trump, by his nature.

However one part of the first debate was that the muting might have saved Trump from his own worst impulses. To be sure, Biden made his own problems that were far far worse, but part of Trump looking relatively reasonable in his conduct that night was being forced only to speak in turn.

Slam dunk is if you let him put his unhinged nature and unreasonable behavior on full display, while also managing to manage him so that you are still heard.

I would not be surprised if a career in the courtroom dealing with all manner of hard to deal with people is the best prep anyone could ask for to deal with a personality like Trump.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 51 points 3 months ago
[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

Why are you sending us a cock pic?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 47 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Calling it now:

Since there’s not enough time left for him to recover from this brutal ego bruise, I predict he’ll only do rallies from now on, or appearances on far-right media, because he’ll retreat to his snowglobe for reassurance for a while. He’ll avoid addressing Kamala directly, but he’ll ramp up his own network and rile up his mob. His team will struggle to rein him in, and some appearances might be cancelled.

e: once he gets tired of being reassured, he’ll double-down on the unhinged scale

[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago

This would be a good time for Kamala to keep asking for a debate and challenging him. Maybe even agree to do it on Fox to show how weak he is. Even if he accepted, I don’t think Fox would save him from another bad performance. We’ll see how polling works out I guess.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nl4real@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago

No surprise, she played him like a fiddle.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

He also has a habit of rewatching things like that, and I suspect it has made him bitter. Well, more bitter.

[-] showmeyourkizinti@startrek.website 41 points 3 months ago
[-] downhomechunk@midwest.social 17 points 3 months ago
[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Cha-chee cha-chee cha-chee

[-] downhomechunk@midwest.social 13 points 3 months ago

Has any of you ever SEEN a chicken?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] EvilBit@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago

Trump’s campaign manager, using Trump’s phone: “yes this is definitely Donald Trump bigly president please cancel my appointment of debate thank you bye”

[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago

I see why he misses Biden so much. He got cooked in that debate.

[-] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 28 points 3 months ago

Someone needs to build a huge projection screen outside his rat infested shithole in Florida, and every night he's there, replay the debate for him.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] zcd@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 months ago
[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 26 points 3 months ago
[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 months ago

Trump's advisors were reaching for any reason to convince him he won, because they know how disastrous another debate would be.

Not to worry, we will be entertained by the Walz-Vance faceoff, though I'll admit giving TFG the talking to he's deserved since forever ago was immensely gratifying.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 22 points 3 months ago

Couldn't even commit to the "concepts of a plan" for a second debate

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

He went from orange to yellow.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 21 points 3 months ago

cowards gonna cowar

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 3 months ago

Well, as he said, he certainly won the first one. I don't know why he wouldn't wanna keep racking up wins. Unless, maybe he's embarrassed to have been manipulated right… the fuck over… by… a… woman.

[-] riskable@programming.dev 15 points 3 months ago

Nothing says, "normal" and, "sane" like typing up a long rant in ALL CAPS declaring, "I WON!" while your opponent holds the gold.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
720 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19241 readers
2374 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS