969
submitted 2 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 170 points 2 months ago

Bernie on the right side of history as usual

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 103 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If Hillary's primary team hasn't taken over the DNC, we'd be coming out of term 2 of Bernie with one of the most progressive Supreme Courts in modern history...

Like just stop for a second and think about how much shit would be different if we took the slam dunk of Bernie against trump in 2016, instead of trying to cram Hillary Clinton down America's throats.

We were this fucking close to a functional society

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 42 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

But instead the corporate side of the party would rather lose an election and blame Sanders and the Greens for losing. Same thing in 2000. Nader gave Gore a list of policies and said he'd drop out and endorse him if he just promised to implement just 2 of those policies. Instead of doing that, he chose to lose, and then 9/11 and the Iraq war happened, setting off an unprecedented loss of civil liberties and law enforcement abuses under Bush (and I would still say that Bush Jr was probably worse than Trump in terms of body counts and terrible policies that are still in place).

[-] un_aristocrate@jlai.lu 9 points 2 months ago

He would rather be on the left side though.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 127 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

There’s an alternate timeline where Bernie won in 2016 and restored the middle class in America. Living wages, affordable housing, affordable everything, universal healthcare, and a common sense foreign policy.

I’m not saying he’s perfect. He would have made mistakes. But he would have been the best president since FDR.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 114 points 2 months ago

There’s an alternate timeline where he wins and can’t get anything through because there aren’t enough progressive Dems in the senate.

[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 56 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So the same as if any other Democrat won but unlike the other Democrats, at least he would have still tried?

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago

Or where upon it seems he'll be blocked, he goes individually to each of the blocking members states or districts, and campaigns his ideas directly to those who will be most affected, both upsetting precedent and dra international attention to individuals blocking the legislation.

You act like there wasn't a plan. I assure you , there was a plan.

[-] would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 months ago

Being in a position where the entire country hears his very reasonable, very easy to understand words over and over again would eventually have an effect. Even the die-hards would eventually be asking themselves if it is in fact reasonable that corporations are assfucking each and every one of us every single day. Some of them would vote in a more progressive representative.

Would he get everything passed? Absolutely not. But he would get some good stuff through.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 months ago

In that case, Bernie’s executive orders would have blotted out the sun. How do courts strike down student loans being forgiven under a new legal theory every month?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 103 points 2 months ago

This guy has a consistent habit of being on the right side of history.

[-] Noodle07@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago

Politicians hate him for his one simple trick

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 90 points 2 months ago

Thank you Bernie for having both sense and moral courage. I mean it'll fail to pass because almost everyone else are bastards, but thank you anyway.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 months ago

I think it helps to force a vote on unpopular things they might not otherwise admit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Jamil@lemm.ee 76 points 2 months ago

It's not a 'sale'. It's a handout to the welfare apartheid state, while Americans are wondering why their roads are falling apart, their education sucks and no universal health care.

[-] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 20 points 2 months ago

Tell that to the arms companies that are supplying about 5 bil worth of stuff for 20 bil of taxpayer's money

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 73 points 2 months ago

I like taxes. I want them to fund things in my community. I don't want them paying for the deaths of an entire people.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] foggianism@lemmy.world 58 points 2 months ago

Bernie is a national treasure. His qualities as a politician and as a human being are going be recognized by the generations to come.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago

If we don't elect more people like him quick, I'm afraid future generations will see us as all the same.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] alienanimals@lemmy.world 48 points 2 months ago

Bernie should have been president.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago

I wish Bernie would weaponize the filibuster the way Rand Paul does to block these things. I'm glad his heart is in the right place and I'm glad he does these things, but he doesn't want to play dirty and it's 2024, you need to play dirty when they're willing to.

[-] stormeuh@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago

The problem with using the filibuster is that it only works when you know the other side doesn't have 67% in the senate. With both the democratic and republican parties being in the pocket of AIPAC, I suspect they could easily get the votes to break Bernie's filibuster.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Maybe, but I feel like it's worth a try.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

If anything could get the Democrats to actually get rid of the filibuster, it would be blocking weapons for genocide.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 6 points 2 months ago

My dude, Bernie did a 8.5 hour filibuster and was coherent and on point the whole time, no phone book reading https://youtu.be/pm6qy_9E0rY

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago

Give it all to Ukraine instead.

Fuck Israel. Fuck putin.

[-] aaaaace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 months ago

Convince Israel that the Palestinians have resettled in Russia.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] DJDarren@thelemmy.club 24 points 2 months ago

How very antisemiti...oh, hang on...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MellowYellow13@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Lets go Bernieee

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 16 points 2 months ago

The Jew Bernie Sanders is ANTISEMITIC!

[-] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

But please think about the shareholders!

[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

It won’t work, but bless his actual heart for trying.

[-] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago

Thank you, Senator Bernard Sanders. You rock and you're my hero.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Aipac fuming

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
969 points (98.3% liked)

News

23267 readers
2412 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS