492

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee (R) on Wednesday said 2024 will be the last election “decided by ballots rather than bullets” if former President Trump doesn’t win the presidential race because of his various legal battles.

In the latest episode of his show on TBN, Huckabee argued the legal woes now facing Trump are part of a politically motivated scheme from the Biden administration, an argument touted by many in the former president’s orbit.

“If these tactics end up working to keep Trump from winning or even running in 2024, it is going to be the last American election that will be decided by ballots rather than bullets,” Huckabee warned in his opening monologue.

Huckabee accused President Biden and his team of trying “to make sure that Donald Trump is not his opponent in 2024″ and “to destroy Trump in the courthouse rather than at the ballot box.” He also alleged the Justice Department, the IRS and the FBI are “conspiring to hide the Biden family crimes, while all the time being obsessed with charging Donald Trump with crimes.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 400 points 1 year ago

Arrest him for fomenting insurrection.

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 132 points 1 year ago

Seriously. They're just gonna keep doing this dancing on the edges bullshit until someone comes down on them fucking hard.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 80 points 1 year ago

The Prison Boys leader who just got 22 years in prison admitted he knew all along that Convicted Sex Offender Treason Trump did not win the election. The media needs to point out the obvious. That the Prison Boys and Oathbreakers are Tory militia groups who were trying to destroy the Founding Father's government and reestablish a dictatorship/monarchy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mjhelto@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago

Or a bunch of idiots kill a bunch of people.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, that's what they're counting on. That certainly wouldn't stop them since that's the point of the entire exercise. Although this particular example comes dangerously close to dancing over the line into incitement if it doesn't already.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Feels like pretty strong linkages to obstruction of justice if you're trying to brazenly influence the outcome of a trial under the threat of violence.

[-] Fades@lemmy.world 147 points 1 year ago

let us win or we’ll kill you

👍

[-] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The amount of Republicans that have no idea how strapped Democrats are is too damn high lol. While I'd love c/liberalgunowners to be as high as Republicans but, it's not THAT much of a numbers difference. 6/10 of Republicans live in a gun household vs 1/4 Democrats. Republicans usually sit at 40% of the pop vs Democrats at 50%.

Then they'll be fighting against the damn US Military with only the really full on bat shit Republicans. Jan 6th already showed us how many actually wanted to nut up. Hey, turns out not that many! There's a reason why there was a whopping 2, 3-star generals, RETIRED, that came out in favor of Trump. People think the military is filled with nothing but Republicans too, but Joe Biden beat Trump by 4 points in the military in 2020 lol.

The crazy fucks had their chance on January 6th already lol. Sorry people, it's not going to be a civil war. It's going to be increasing amounts of Republican extremism like it already has been for the last decade and more.

In the United States in 2022, 48 percent of Republicans reported that they owned at least one gun, and 66 percent said that they lived in a household with a gun. In comparison, only 20 percent of Democrats owned at least one gun, and 31 percent lived a gun household.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/249775/percentage-of-population-in-the-us-owning-a-gun-by-party-affiliation/

Pew Graph

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2017/06/22/the-demographics-of-gun-ownership/

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] stigmata@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Luckily most Trumpers wouldn't last more than a few minutes in a firefight before they run out of breath.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 121 points 1 year ago

Did Huckabees just threaten another insurrection?

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 year ago

An extremely violent one at that. Now, let’s watch how quickly nothing continues to happen as a result of it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 119 points 1 year ago

He also alleged the Justice Department, the IRS and the FBI are “conspiring to hide the Biden family crimes, while all the time being obsessed with charging Donald Trump with crimes.”

Did all those supposed Biden crimes occur since 2020? No? Then why did the Trump administration let these supposed crimes go uninvestigated?

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Anyone who says "Biden crime family" or a similar variant / transposition unironically, I have to ignore.

For my own sanity.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 117 points 1 year ago

it's amazing how anti-American Republicans have become

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 107 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

His daughter is governor of a state. He was governor of a state. These are the kinds of people republicans are voting for office- do not let republicans get away with bastardizing the meaning of patriot. They are traitors at worst or traitor sympathizers at best.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 92 points 1 year ago

These aren't even veiled threats anymore. These are actual, out-in-the-open threats and they continue to happen because Democrats aren't doing anything about them.

Within hours of Huckabee making these threats, the FBI or Secret Service should be parading him in the streets with handcuffs on as they bring him in for questioning. Make an example of him, Palin and all the other right wing lunatics that are threatening our democracy.

But as usual, we give right wing lunatics a free-pass and then wonder why they continue to escalate this issue.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

And meanwhile, Trump is openly stating that his second term would be a revenge tour where he'll arrest anyone who opposes him. He doesn't care if there are any actual crimes committed because he thinks opposing him is a crime in itself.

[-] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

Thus fascism. And a good 1/4 to 1/3 of the country agrees with him, and the remaining 3/4 to 2/3 of the country either have no idea what is happening or are too busy bickering amongst themselves.

[-] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

We will look back on the Dems the same way we look at the socdems in Germany who put up almost no resistance to the Nazis coming to power. I'd love to be wrong.

[-] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

I unfortunately have to agree to some extent.

There are so few Dems out there who are willing to duke it out with the Right. I don't blame Biden for not stooping down to the level of tweeting insults to the Right. He's president and thus should appear presidential not like his clown of a predecessor. But for fucks sakes there should be someone in the Democratic party that instigates the Right and is willing to play dirty and call them out on their shit. AOC was a firecracker and even when I disagreed with her, I loved that she would duke it out with any Republican. But there are so few others.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 84 points 1 year ago

Lets play a game. How many elected republican officials can threaten civil war before they are barred from office?

[-] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

Tommy Tuberville is singlehandedly ratfucking the entire military through inaction and still gets to collect his 6-figure check.

Doubt anything will happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Is it zero? Cause I fully expect the answer to be zero unfortunately.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] akai@kbin.social 71 points 1 year ago

Projection and threats, that's all they know how to do

[-] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Give them some credit, they also know how to smash ~~windows~~police officers and wipe poop on walls

[-] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Hey now if you can’t smear shit on the capitol and try to hang the VP then according to sarah palin 'What's The Use In Being A Good Guy?'

[-] Harpsist@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago

America. Are you ok? Blink twice if you need international help.

Or about just a friend from the north?

[-] PostmodernPythia@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

Blibk blink blink blink blink!!!!!!

load more comments (2 replies)

I think you know we need help.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Glide@lemmy.ca 65 points 1 year ago

"If Democracy doesn't give me the result I want, I'll turn to Fascism!"

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 27 points 1 year ago

That's exactly what is happening.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago

Sounds like a terroristic threat...

[-] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 53 points 1 year ago

Now if that isn't stochastic terrorism, I don't know what is.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 47 points 1 year ago

So… trying to make sure a traitor to America pays for his crimes is somehow wrong?

Wasn’t the Conservative Party in favor or patriotism?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] knotthatone@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

Let them try. Trump & his fellow republicans already attempted to violently overthrow our democracy once. Surrendering and allowing them their fever dream of a fascist dictator for life (however much time he's got left) will not improve our situation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Nougat@kbin.social 41 points 1 year ago

Look, another unindicted co-conspirator!

[-] mo_ztt@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

You have that option I think, yes. Why do y'all always assume you're going to win though? You had a chance on January 6th, you had a chance every time Trump calls for a big rally at some courthouse proceeding, Trump had his chance not to surrender and to hole up with all his brave warriors and dare the deep state to come and dig him out.

I'm not saying there's not something very dangerous in these statements, because there is. But I can also confidently guarantee that just like with Ashli Babbit, as soon as bullets start coming back at Huckabee and a lot of these other extremely soft John "I-don't-do-all-that-well-when-my-plumbing-has-an-issue-let-alone-on-a-goddamned-battlefield" Eastman types, they're going to start all kinds of aggrieved moaning about how someone needs to enforce the laws against political violence, because this is crazy.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Nusm@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago

Do it! DO IT!! Shut up talking about it, and let’s get the civil war started!! Because I suspect it will be over before supper time.

In reality all they’re going to do is talk about it, because they’re small weak little people. Look at the big bad Proud Boys. When faced with the consequences of jail, they cried like little girls and begged the judges to take pity on them. Only one defiantly yelled “TRUMP WON” on his way out is the courtroom, but that was even after he cried and groveled.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] FarceMultiplier@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 year ago

So they've decided to be terrorists.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] athos77@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago

if former President Trump doesn’t win the presidential race because of his various legal battles.

Maybe he'll lose because so many people really loathe him.

[-] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Y'know, this sort of rhetoric seems less about making a prediction (there will be violence) than it is about cueing his audience to prepare to be violent, or at least to accept that there will be violence.

Yeah, it looks like an innocent prediction from the guy that can see the writing on the wall, and that's why this kind of talk takes this form and not the form of explicitly calling for political violence from particular people- this way it's all deniable and stochastic enough that nobody's (hint, hint) actually breaking the law out in the open.

[-] jimbo@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Surprised to see this turd still floating around.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wwaxwork@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Yeah but if he wins there is going to be violence. I'd rather take my chances with the violence that happens because he lost than because he's ordering people that disagree with him off into camps.

[-] Ertebolle@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

The problem is that even if this is empty bluster on Huckabee's part, some jackass is going to decide that "deciding an election by bullets" means murdering a dozen random people at his local Wal-Mart.

[-] GreenMario@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

That's the goal. "Give us what we want or you and yours might get shot up at the local store."

Just like we don't let a nuclear dictator take what they want because "omg hed nuke us" we don't let some sister fucker redneck asshole have what he wants because he might shoot us. Either pull the trigger or fuck off.

[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Reminder: Mike Huckabee is Wrong About Everything!!! Always

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] halfempty@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

Palin, now Huckabee. These conservatives are just drooling over their potential "civil war".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
492 points (95.4% liked)

politics

19096 readers
1159 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS