245

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

187 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 12 points 3 months ago

It'd be nice if we didn't kill the world when we do, but we will. And if the empires that are eager to snap up the corpse weren't demonstrably worse.

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 months ago

So I suppose you oppose the United States of America then, since its very existence is destroying the world

So once again, my post

[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 11 points 3 months ago

It is better than the conditions 50% of the planet's populace live in, even if at least 10% of that was caused by the USA. If you have a collapse, you'll get at least partially what's shown in Civil War (2024).

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Better because it relies on the suffering and exploitation of those in the global south, so again: See post

The world will be better off without the USA

Edit: That's a bullshit movie BTW. It's like a redditor's ignorant idea of what would happen.

[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 13 points 3 months ago

Unless you propose that nearly every nation in the world collapse, the global south would be further exploited to fill the vacuum created by the hole in exports of electrical machinery, which all developing and above nations need.

Why not collapse Russia first?