48
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 22 points 4 months ago

Quillette, Claire Lehmann’s longform magazine focused on science and cultural critique and the home of, among other things, the best-researched article I know of on gender differences in chess

[-] sc_griffith@awful.systems 27 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
[-] BigMuffin69@awful.systems 23 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

my honest reacton:

Edit: Judit Polgár for ref if anyone wants to learn about one of the greatest of all times. Her dad claimed he was doing a nature/nurture experiment in order to prove that anyone could be great if they were trained to master a skill from a young age, so taught his 3 daughters chess. Judit achieved the rank of number 8 in the world OVERALL and beat multiple WC including Kasparov over her career.

idk its almost like if more girls were encouraged to play chess and felt welcome in the community these apparent skill differences might disappear

[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 16 points 4 months ago

Judit Polgár

Sadly, I know where this goes, they will just point out she is Jewish and point to that. (I think SSC even did that).

[-] BigMuffin69@awful.systems 20 points 4 months ago

Wishful thinking on my part to think their sexism/eugenics posting was based on ignorance instead of deliberately being massive piles of shit. Don't let them know Iceland has the highest number of GMs/pop or else we'll get a 10,000 page essay about how proximity to volcanoes gives + 20 IQ points.

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 13 points 4 months ago

In that case, selling sulphur supplements for drinking water may turn out profitable

[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 12 points 4 months ago

Careful, that might cause the humanbiodiversity posters to react and draw lines on maps! (Is that still a thing? I can't recall seeing much HBD posters anymore, likely my own bubble of course).

[-] rationalistmormons@awful.systems 15 points 4 months ago

Indeed. He did a post entirely about the family being Ashkenazi Jews. You're never going to guess the premise of the post!

[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 11 points 4 months ago

Was it about how feminism is bad.

No wait sorry, I'm misrepresenting his position.

Was it about how only 30% of feminists are sane and the rest are insane?

[-] Evinceo@awful.systems 10 points 4 months ago

Or at least not provably not insane.

[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 8 points 4 months ago

Yes thanks, didn't want to dreg up the full quote.

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 22 points 4 months ago

ah yes quillette, that fine bastion of whitewashing

the best-researched article I know of on gender differences in chess

just.... the absolute weirdest thing to pick? like, fucking seriously? or is there some weird-ass chess proxy-fixation among the rats that I have thus far been blessedly unaware of?

[-] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 23 points 4 months ago

or is there some weird-ass chess proxy-fixation among the rats that I have thus far been blessedly unaware of?

Gonna take a shot in the dark and say the fixation's from viewing chess more as an IQ showcase than as a game.

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 10 points 4 months ago

probably but it isn't one I've come across (in this form), thus my surprise

[-] YouKnowWhoTheFuckIAM@awful.systems 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

They’re all in for Chess as a sine qua non metric for intelligence if you spend enough time staring into the pit. Better to call it g than IQ tbh. Not only does it (chess) have the lick of rigour, it has the nerd cultural cachet and the ludicrous white masculinity complex.

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 10 points 4 months ago

also, just ito "things to pick by which to point out dirtrag as a Shining Beacon", it's pretty fucking out there

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

I assume any publication that has ever run anything by Andy Ngo is absolute trash garbage.

[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 13 points 4 months ago

or is there some weird-ass chess proxy-fixation among the rats that I have thus far been blessedly unaware of?

Iirc ssc has written about it so yes

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 14 points 4 months ago

Has anyone informed them that Elon Musk, the smartest man alive, dismissed chess as two low-dimensional and prefers to be challenged by some PC multiplayer combat game instead?

[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Musk is fascinating for the Rationalists ideasets, as he clearly is really inspired by Rationalism (and follows a few of them, ssc iirc). But he also so mid and bland that he draws the Rationalists ideaset down with him. If you heard him talk about space colonization (esp the argument he had with Bezos, who is more of a O’Neill Cylinder guy which iirc caused one of those weird dismissive Musk reactions (dismisses it as dumb without any good argument (if there is one at all)) which people mistake for genius), simulation theory, AI and esp AI safety (ow to see the LW reactions when Musk said 'we are just going to make the AGI safe by building in safety', etc.

It is like as a metal fan you hear a big celebrity is into heavy metal, but turns out all he knows is Metallica. A politician who claims he is into warhammer, but all he has is a few tactical ultramarine squads.

It is a bit of a pattern, there in something dumb, a new even more popular thing or person appears which sucks in all the attention and then draws all the ideas down by being even worse. Which causes people to look more clearly into the first thing and see how bad it is by association. For example cryptocurrencies and NFTs, the obvious uselessness and scammyness of NFTs revealed the similar qualities in the cryptocurrencies space. But also just every culture war Vox Day parasitically attaches himself too (He does this a lot, any rightwing thing that becomes a bit popular he leeches himself onto, often makes a worse related movement (the sad vs angry puppies for example) and then drags it all down by being an open sexist/white nationalist/all out horrible dumb person who thinks he is smarter than he is.

Sorry this turned into a bit of a rant.

[-] 200fifty@awful.systems 10 points 4 months ago

Not even -- it's a simplified Civilization clone for mobile. (It actually sounds like a pretty neat little game, but, uh, chess it is not!)

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 11 points 4 months ago

There are no hidden layers to Elon Musk’s thinking. He likes the gratification of impulsively pushing a button and seeing the numbers go up. He likes games that are straightforward and easy to beat. He’d rather reset every 45 minutes than execute meticulous plans that extend far into an uncertain future. He does not think ten moves ahead. He just responds with maximal aggression to the latest change of conditions. (The stock is down again. Announce robotaxis!) When this works, he gets the satisfaction of dominance. When it doesn’t, he can always just reset and try again. Elon Musk’s suit of armor is that he is extremely rich.

So it’s the gamer equivalent of one of those big-game hunting safaris where the game has been corralled and pre-tranquilised for the client’s convenience?

[-] dgerard@awful.systems 11 points 4 months ago

not playing it, you understand

[-] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 19 points 4 months ago

Back in 1995, when I was born, Gerard was my age

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 18 points 4 months ago

"Gerard was the age I am now in 1995 when I was born. Alice is twice my age and stands 4 metres to the left of Gerard. She is half the height of Imhotep..."

[-] slopjockey@awful.systems 6 points 4 months ago

The National Socialist party of Germany, Hitler's party focused on advancing German rights and the hone of, among other things, the best outfits I've seen of a political party

[-] Collectivist@awful.systems 2 points 1 month ago

I read the article, not a single mention of things like the research on stereotype threat in chess. I wish rationalists would crack open a sociology book at some point in their lives. They're so interested in social phenomena, but while Less Wrong has a tag for psychology (with 287 posts), history (245 posts), and economics (462 posts), they seem unwilling to look at sociology for explanations, with it not even having a tag on LW.

this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
48 points (98.0% liked)

SneerClub

982 readers
9 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS