this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
352 points (93.6% liked)

politics

30960 readers
1965 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 40 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Then morally don't do it yourself and leave everyone else to make their own decisions.

Why do so many people care about what other people do to their own bodies?

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 43 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They oppose bans on care. But a slight majority thinks it's wrong to transition.

I think that's what you're looking for. They don't want to do it, but don't want to ban anyone who's doing it.

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The title could've been more clear, thanks for providing that clarification

[–] Shyfer@ttrpg.network 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah I'm glad everyone else was confused, too. I felt like the dumb one for thinking it was the opposite.

[–] Beaver@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

“But a slight majority thinks it's wrong to transition.”

Looks like someone forgot what freedom was about and needs to be educated on it.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I think the people surveyed agree with you here. They're saying that they're opposed to the surgery, but they don't want to ban the surgeries even though they oppose them.

[–] Aksamit@slrpnk.net 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Minors aren't getting any surgeries.

Gender affirming care for trans kids involves seeing psychiatrists, social transitioning, and, if they're lucky, puberty blockers till they're old enough to decide whether they want to medically and surgically transition.

[–] match@pawb.social 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] die444die@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And that’s a completely different issue that’s totally separate from the anti trans laws being pushed by the right wing today.

[–] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You didn't get their point. The only children who are getting gender reassignment surgery are the ones who right wing doctors are trying to assign a gender to, despite medical consensus that it's unnecessary, he's calling the right wing misinformed and hypocritical

[–] die444die@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I agree with what you are saying here, I’m just not sure that was the previous posters point.

It may have been, but it reads to me like they are just saying “nuh uh” to the person above them.

[–] match@pawb.social 1 points 2 years ago

volodya_ilich is correct! but also I think it would be useful to use this energy on both sides to prevent gender assignment surgeries on infants (even if the right does not realize the context?)

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

I am aware. I wasn't in the survey

[–] Beaver@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They need to be informed that surgery alleviates gender dysphoria and saves tens of thousands in the long run from poor mental health to lessen productivity.

The healthcare system should cover every gender affirming care surgery available.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Don't accept their definition shifting. They wrap surgery into "gender affirming care" then say young children get GAC to make people think they're regularly performing surgery on 12 year olds. Hormone blockers are GAC too.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

I know. I wasn't in the survey

[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There are many misconceptions here. For instance, a sizeable fraction of the public believes that minors receive a sex-change surgery (they don’t) as opposed to just medication and therapy. I think most people are mostly worried that it is easy to transition and kids might do it without considering the consequences. These myths could be easily dispelled if they actually talk to transgenders.

[–] Beaver@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago

Good point but please say transgender people instead as transgender is an adjective.