this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
1051 points (97.0% liked)

politics

31182 readers
2464 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said the reelection of former President Trump would be the “end of democracy” in an interview released Saturday by The Guardian.

“It will be the end of democracy, functional democracy,” Sanders said in the interview.

The Vermont senator also said in the interview that he thinks that another round of Trump as the president will be a lot more extreme than the first.

“He’s made that clear,” Sanders said. “There’s a lot of personal bitterness, he’s a bitter man, having gone through four indictments, humiliated, he’s going to take it out on his enemies. We’ve got to explain to the American people what that means to them — what the collapse of American democracy will mean to all of us.”

Sanders’s words echo those President Biden made in a recent campaign speech during which he said that Trump’s return to the presidency would risk American democracy. The president highlighted the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol in an attempt to cement a point about Trump and other Republicans espousing a kind of extremism that was seen by the world on that day.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Whoa people are mad that their president is funding a genocide?? :0

Smh they should just stfu and vote. Who cares about foreigners dying

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Trump didn't care about US citizens dying, or did he apologize for fucking up his covid response yet?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Trump is a fascist piece of shit.

Biden is not, and he should not be supporting a genocide.

[–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Trump is a fascist piece of shit

Biden is a zionist piece of shit

[–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Lmao did you think I was suggesting he's somehow better?

I just find it funny that Americans pretend like their bourgeois "democracy" isn't just a poorly veiled oligarchy where you get to "choose" between the genocidal zionazi party and the fascist party.

Neither of whom give a fuck about the working class, though one is a bit better at pretending like they do.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

One side is clearly better unless you do false equivalence, look at the mortality rate of mothers in states with abortion bans and without etc.

I know this is not as edgy of a take as your both sides cuntery but there is clearly a better and worse choice for the US regardless what kind of zionazi epic words you want to use from your basement setup.

It's not like Americans don't know their system is broken, but it's not like they can fix it one day to the next, they have an election coming up where they have to choose between a shit candidate and a straight up fascist who tried to overthrow their election

[–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah I do agree people should probably still vote for the genocide party, as long as they're organizing outside the system and building class consciousness to eventually overthrow it.

Just that they shouldn't pretend like they're not voting for a genocidal zionazi.

what kind of zionazi epic words

Are "genocide" and "nazi" also "epic words"? It conveys the fact that Biden is a zionist and a nazi quite well, no? Specially when I've linked him admitting he is one.

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He's backing Israel because it's what they've always done. It's a strategic alliance. It's Nathan yahoo dropping bombs on cities

[–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Is that why Biden is such an ardent zionist?

It's Nathan yahoo dropping bombs on cities

People trying to blame one guy for everything wrong instead of blaming the capitalist system that necessitates supporting a genocidal colony for profit and expansion in the first place will never not be funny.

Take "Nathan yahoo" out of power; not much will change until Palestine is decolonized against US and Europe's capitalist interests; i.e the basic material conditions for this conflict happening in the first place are addressed.

It's a strategic alliance

Correct, it serves to continue to destabilize the middle east to slow down opposition to western imperialism by not letting the region unite.

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Which problem? But I highly doubt it