TechTakes

2725 readers

226 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

dgerard@awful.systems

222

Anthropic: Could AI be conscious? Pope Leo: lol, no (pivot-to-ai.com)

submitted 4 days ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

48 comments fedilink hide all child comments

‘Algorithms lack the spark of humanity’

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VCWgoIrRCo&list=UU9rJrMVgcXTfa8xuMnbhAEA - video
https://pivottoai.libsyn.com/20261005-anthropic-could-ai-be-conscious-pope-leo-lol-no - podcast

time: 7 min 58 sec

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Sina@beehaw.org -4 points 3 days ago (3 children)

You could be totally right for all I know, but my argument against is that we humans have no idea what consciousness is & souls may not be real at all. To me panpsychism is more plausible than the vast majority of theories or mumbo jumbo regarding the soul, saying this as a comparison of plausibility without claiming that consciousness and the soul are the same or necessarily closely related.

[–] ebu@awful.systems 5 points 3 days ago

"what if EVERYTHING is secretly conscious, including the random word predictor" i say, flailing my paws in the air

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 3 days ago

Lack of evidence is not evidence for your pet theory.

[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 1 points 2 days ago

I mean, fair enough, but can you explain how that impacts your decisions? What does panpsychism imply in matters of ethics or epistemology? Does it matter that the air you breathe can be thought of as in some way conscious?