News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
There's still the flaw in thinking that this is somehow going to make things better or more just. Her daughter will still have been brutally murdered and someone else will now be dead. None of the other material conditions change.
I'm not saying I personally think it's just, but if your personal sense of justice is "eye for an eye", which is true for a lot of Americans, then I can see how life in prison feels like more of an injustice. To people with a vengeful sense of justice, every day she lives that her victim does not is itself an injustice.
Unfortunately, words like fairness and justice are not objective static concepts. We as a society often determine their meanings and American justice is definitely more vengeful in nature.
Vengeance only makes sense when I get it. This is very narrow, child-like, self-centered thinking, which is on point for American individualism. There is no thought on how things affect anyone else. People will be wronged, some more than others. If the only way you can conceive of to correct a wrong is to wrong someone else, things like vengeance start to make sense. What no one thinks of is escalation and normalization. Then they have the audacity to act shocked or, even worse, defensive when someone kills someone else, eg., when they were cut off in traffic. After all, why wouldn't you? No one else matters and you were absolutely inconvenienced.
This woman could deal with her trauma, which is absolutely real, but she would rather hold onto it, make it a part of her, nourish it, and pretend that she will be better off after she has vengeance. Healing is a personal journey, and she has chosen to not take it, no matter what excuse she has used to justify it.
I disagree that people who are vengeful only care when it's for their personal benefit. I think most people who think vengeance equals justice are happy to see people "get what's coming to them" in general. I think most people want to personally avoid punishment, so of course if they're the recipient of vengeance then they will deem it too harsh, but I think that's a feature of humanity, not necessarily the vengeful mind. In societies where restorative justice is more common I'm sure people would also prefer the lightest sentence possible.
Though I think American individualism has myriad flaws, I don't think more collectivist societies are inherently immune to vengeful justice. After all, an eye for an eye predates America by millennia, and is often considered an improvement as it set a limit on what could be done, though obviously there were other less vengeful laws that predate that.
This is because they never believe they will be the one that wronged someone until it actually happens, or that they will escape punishment if they do. They are completely unwilling or unable to put themselves in the other person's shoes. Certainly, that's harder in this particular case. As for the escalation that inevitably happens with vengeance, which is why justice started with the concept of "an eye for an eye", this just means it gets worse. We are, or should not be at this point, at the brink of civilization. We have more resources and tools to guarantee that justice is reasonably served and society is safe without having to put people to death. People who see that as a viable or even necessary option need to reevaluate their concept of the value of human life. Lack of doing so or being taught that, which this murderer certainly didn't get early enough in her life, is the root cause of a lot of these situations, and is not a solution.