Lemmy Shitpost
Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.
Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means:
-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
1.Memes
10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)
Reach out to
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker
view the rest of the comments
Source? Average age of first sex for males is about 15 in my country.
And their dicks are all fifteen inches. And people never lie on surveys.
Edit: If you think critically about it, that means for every 25-year-old having sex for the first time, you need two 10-year-olds that got laid to offset it. That doesn't pass the sniff test.
It's not that I believe that the currently known figures are accurate, but that I'm still waiting for a source for "early 20s". That commenter made a specific claim with nothing to back it up. Could just as well be 19, or 29.
I have reference. For the U.S.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db366.htm
Data from 2015 2017.
And some newer data. https://www.cdc.gov/yrbs/dstr/index.html
This site here uses that data and made easy to read graphs.
https://opa.hhs.gov/adolescent-health/adolescent-sexual-and-reproductive-health/data-and-statistics-on-adolescent-sexual-and-reproductive-health
Like this one.
Showing most kids graduate high school without having had intercourse yet.
Another gov site with data for 2024.
https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/134957
Neat. Why specifically "never-married", though?
It's exclusion criteria.
In some states, those with high Mormon populations, teenagers are married. And so that doesn't represent the rest of the country. So these individuals are excluded.
They also don't count same sex , sexual activity, oral or anal sex. Or anything other than "penis in vagina".
That info would be for a different kind of study.
But why are those not interesting for this study? It kinda feels like the question they want to answer is "how many teenager are having premarital sex, i.e. dirty sinners" instead of "what is people's age of first sex". Which would also mean that lots of teenagers would feel encouraged to claim that they're virgins when they actually aren't.
Because that would be a different study.
You could compare their behaviors to non married teens or whatever else.
Or compare the homosexual and bi teens to hetero ones.
I'm sure such studies do exist.
But you can't just have all these wild card variables lumped together.
In research you have to try to use parameters that best represent a population if you are doing a study on general trends.
It's very common to exclude anyone who isn't "average" from a study on average behaviors.
Especially when you know already that there are systematic differences.
For example. Married teens, always hetero, are engaging in sex.
That would distort the actual numbers if you added them into your computations.
Do you think the study counted for reporting bias or whatever you'd call it?
I was in my 20s, but if anyone asks I was crushing puss since I was 14 bruv you get me man cant even count the bitches
Females (man I hate using that word, but "girls" or "women" don't really seem appropriate here, either) have similar numbers, I kind of doubt that most of them had boyfriends in their early 20s, or a similar incentive to lie about it.
Either way, the "early 20s" claim is unsourced and pretty far from what's generally accepted, so there's just no reason to believe it.