this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2026
79 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

87877 readers
3189 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A group representing American automakers sent a letter (PDF) Thursday to congressional leaders asking for a "permanent ban" on Chinese-made cars in the U.S. John Bozzella, the Alliance for Automotive Innovation's CEO and president, described in the letter China's manufacturing industry as "rooted in a well-documented pattern of unfair trade, subsidies, intellectual property theft and surveillance." Bozzella addressed his request to Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) -- urging them to back a "permanent ban on the sale, import and manufacture of Chinese connected vehicles," before the 119th Congress concludes in January.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 75 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Or you know, the government could just match Chinese industry subsidies so they're competing on level playing fields.

China's government is using government power to invest in critical and necessary industries that benefits everyone, like renewables and EVs, driving down their costs.

The US instead spends it's money investing in fossil fuel companies, and letting billionaires hoard it, and then complains when Chinese EVs are cheaper. You're the richest fucking country in the world. Stop fucking whining and start using your wealth to produce competitive EVs. It's not that fucking complicated.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 9 minutes ago

Or you know, the government could just match Chinese industry subsidies

The problem is we did. The last 2-3 decades had billions in subsidies toward battery technology and battery electric vehicles. Then they got canceled. Then reinstated. Then canceled. At this point Chinas biggest advantage is being able to stay the course

[–] artyom@piefed.social 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They would have to go back in time and apply those subsidies 15 years ago. Chinese are so far ahead at this point, US stands little chance of catching up. Couldn't hurt though.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The best time may have been yesterday, but the second best time is today.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So far ahead in what way? We're talking about powering electric motors not building pico-scale computer processors. The difficult advancements in EVs is with the battery technology and battery technology is not specific to EVs themselves. We've been building cars for over a hundred years at this point so the rest of the car building process is already well established here.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 5 minutes ago

Just like every other manufacturing industry where China has come to dominate, a big part of their strength is also developing the supply chain, suppliers and to foster competition. There’s an entire web of industry to support car building and scaling demand to make it work.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 12 points 2 days ago

You forgot to mention investing in the MIC (Military Industrial Compex).

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

I would argue everything they do for oil and anti-electric legislation is US car subsidies.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

The money would be used for huge bonuses for the executives and US cars wouldn't be any cheaper or able to complete in the end.