this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2026
1150 points (99.5% liked)

Fuck AI

8119 readers
1221 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bad take, Mockingbird is great. Compelling and depressingly relevant to this day.

[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a good book, yes, but I was not interested in it and I had the executive function of a teenage boy.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If we catered education to only the things that appeal to the most distracted teenage boys it would just be tits and explosions.

[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Actually I'd like to argue the reflective point: why is there not an expectation that coursework should be interesting and compelling for students?

[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

why is there not an expectation that coursework should be interesting and compelling for students?

As you said, you had the executive function of a teenage boy. The works still get taught because they are interesting and relevant. but it's hard to see that as a kid, as you're developing vocabulary and literacy and also lacking life experiences to relate.

Schools try to compromise by giving a list of choices and letting students choose from those on what is most interesting. But curriculums only flex so much.

they are interesting and relevant. but it’s hard to see that as a kid

Yeah so there's this projection of, this is good and valuable to you, regardless what your circumstances and abilities are.

[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If it gets them writing essays and participating who cares?

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because analyzing themes and connecting it to history and sociology are important media literacy skills that high schoolers should be learning.

[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A Time to Kill won't fulfill that?

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think maybe "retributive vigilantism is good actually" isn't a school-appropriate message.

[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's back to my first point

calm down about the sex, drugs and violence in books. I didn’t have a single interesting assigned reading

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Well that's a skill issue. Just off the top of my head: Romeo & Juliet (most Shakespeare fills at least one of those), Lord of the Flies, Animal Farm, 1984, fucking Canterbury Tales these are not boring stories it seems like you want vapid entertainment rather than education.

[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 16 hours ago

I forgot about Lord of the flies. So that's two books from 8th grade through highschool, I was not assigned the rest of those.

But sure, a time to kill is vapid compared to to kill a Mockingbird. The one where the black characters have agency, and the choices that the lawyer makes with intention matter and have consequences, is vapid. The one where the kids shame a lynchmob and that's the only real disobedience to the system shown in the book is superior.

[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The parents, apparently.