190
Trans athletes never took over women’s sports. So why is the WNBA in an uproar?
(www.sfchronicle.com)
this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2026
190 points (97.0% liked)
News
39146 readers
2140 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The old nazi party targeted trans people as well.
For sure they did, you can read an example here. Unfortunately, that was all lost to history because the Allies didn't really care about queer people either.
In my rural Texas school we were taught that the Nazis targeted queer people too. I would have assumed they'd downplay things since there was a German internment camp not far away, but they even taught about that.
The U.S. put all the queer people back in the concentration camps after they got the Jews out.
https://www.zinnedproject.org/news/tdih/liberation-of-dachau-concentration-camp-except-lgbtq-prisoners/
Many Holocaust education projects are also against talking about the non-Jewish people killed, even though they were the majority of victims (7M/13M). This is because most of them are Zionist self-victimization projects. Here's an awesome video essay on this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0OkIVyBBVs
Badempanada makes good video essays / explainers. He should do more of those and fewer drama-slop takedowns of other leftists for minor slip-ups or small disagreements.
The 'Live' channel videos he makes on other supposed leftists (be it AOC or Hasan) are not really minor slip-ups though. If someone is walking back on the simplest policy decisions like "Defund the police" or if they're supporting unrepenting mass-murderers like Graham Platner I WANT to know about that.
If that were the extent of it it would be fine; I even agree with a lot of his criticisms, but it's become nearly his entire output. When F.D. Signifier took issue with Badempanada's use of Nazi dog-whistles he accused him of being a Zionist. He also accused F.D. Signifier of supporting Graham Platner despite F.D. being one of the first to express concern about him. By jumping on single statements that are often ambiguous, assuming the worst, and ignoring any context that contradicts his accusations he is just creating unnecessary conflict with his close ideological allies. Rather than trying to have a normal conversation about things with other leftists he creates a series of videos scrutinizing everything they say and blowing things out of proportion. If you haven't watched his "debate" with F.D. Signifier where he takes advantage of Overzealot's friendship to hijack a stream he was doing with F.D. and make it about him, you should check it out. It makes the toxic way that Badempanada operates very transparent.
It hasn't become his entire output at all. The Live channel just puts out his livestream clips, and most are against Reich-wingers.
F.D. also DID support Graham Platner:
spoiler
He only made one other video where he was against him ONE month ago, after his discussion with BE and probably after watching his videos, where he denounced Platner for being... white. He also called out Fight Agency for the first time in his life on that video, and couldn't muster up literally anything that he disagreed with in their platform, instead just saying that they weren't platforming black politicians. I don't know if you've watched his videos or if you're just an outsider commenting on this, but if you haven't please do, because I'm not going on an anti-woke tirade here this is quite literally what he did.
BE also never used Nazi dog whistles. Signifier just said he did because he probably read on Wikipedia or something that ZOG was used by Nazis decades ago. Or maybe he is talking about the word Zionist, which he also seems to consider a dog whistle.
And I've watched the complete "debate" as well. F.D. had literally no point, didn't engage with what BE was saying, and just insulted his looks and yelled at BE to call him the hard-r because he was offended by getting called a "ZOG slave", thinking that because it has the word 'slave' in it it has to be racist.
He very obviously doesn't care about the Palestinian cause, instead making pop culture videos defending an extremely privileged group of people against Disney's "AnTiSeMiTiC tRoPeS oF a BiG nOsE aNd StEaLiNg". He's an actual IDPOL slave, and is merely getting backlash for trying to tone-police the people who DO care about this stuff.
Yep. The Nat-C's are just following the Nazi playbook.