this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2026
525 points (99.8% liked)

politics

30937 readers
2133 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Calls for Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s resignation are growing after two unvaccinated people died from measles in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. There have been 393 confirmed measles cases in 28 counties in Pennsylvania this year, and 2,777 total cases nationally—a 35-year high.

These are the first measles deaths in the United States this year, and in Pennsylvania in more than three decades.

“RFK Jr.’s lies and conspiracy theories are making Marylanders sick,” Democratic Maryland Senator Angela Alsobrooks wrote Tuesday on X. “RFK Jr. must resign or be fired. Vaccines are safe and effective. Listen to your pediatrician.”

“Measles is officially out of control. How many more people need to die before there is a nationwide call for RFK Jr. to resign?” said Shaughnessy Naughton, president of the pro-science organizing group 3.14 Action. “His anti-science, anti-vaccine policies are killing people and infecting a generation of Americans with dangerous vaccine skepticism that will take years to recover from.”

...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pigup@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Daily reminder that the billionaire class wants most of us dead. They will not give you health care. They will destroy the CDC. They want pandemics to ravage the masses and reduce our numbers. They want our assets and our wealth and they want you dead. They don't want things to be safe. They don't want cars to be safe. They don't want your drinking water to be safe. They want it all to be as hazardous as possible so that the most number of people die.

They are happy when bad things happen to you. And they really believe that they're entitled to the planet. This is all working towards their goal.

[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 8 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

An empty playground for the rich free of taxation, with AI doing all the production for them. It’s like reverse communism, with the bourgeoisie completely conquereing and eliminating the proletariat.

[–] pigup@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago

It's like Epstein Island, but everywhere!

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

But then why simultaneously complain about low birth rates? They seem to want a growing workforce class they can exploit.

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 18 points 1 day ago

They want the older ones that have known a better life to die so that they can teach the young to serve and obey, that's why they are complaining about birth rates.

[–] pigup@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

They don't have their robotic workforce and killer drones just yet. towards the billionaire utopia, the billionaires require their killing machine to be up and running at max efficiency, yet they still need babies to fuck, kill, and exploit. It's really a a transitional need, not part of what I would think is the final vision.

[–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Its nonsensical.

If the billionaire class wanted everyone dead they wouldn't do it with measles

[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 7 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

You’re assuming these people are competent businessmen who would figure out that killing off the people you’re exploiting for wealth is bad for building further wealth.

Trump is a prime example of the incompetence. He bankrupted multiple casinos, even with Daddy’s inheritance.

They’re just simply good at gaming the system by manipulating market shares and real estate, while buying political power to serve their interests. They’re not businessmen at all. They’re grifters.

[–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 3 points 23 hours ago

On the contrary.

We are in agreement that what's happening is not malice, but incompetence and greed.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Trump is a prime example of the incompetence.

hmm. No.

He got elected President, twice. He's corrupted over $5B in personal money. He has secured infinite power from SCOTUS. He has the entire Republican party scared of him. He has the entire Democratic party neutered.

Sounds pretty competent to me.

[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I don’t think it’s off his own intellect, at all. He doesn’t have much intellect to speak of.

He’s a stooge for the Heritage Foundation, Bibi and Putin. He works off Roy Cohn’s playbook. These guys are great thieves, I’ll concede, but actually running legitimate businesses and succeeding? Nah.

Trump on his own would be just a narcissistic, dumb, rejected NYC tycoon who bankrupt casinos. Don’t give him that much credit.

[–] pigup@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Just like any investment, they diversify their killing methods. Having a disease wipe out a bunch of people they don't like is a slam dunk for them, easy cheap, blame free, results not guaranteed however. But you're damn sure they're going to leave the door open for any sort of disease to come and do some work for them for cheap. As a billionaire, I would not be interested in doing one big stunt to kill a bunch of people because that won't work out for me.

They've much preferred the long drawn out slow-burn of disease and poverty. Its not only entertaining and strokes their ego, it's also the best way to get the results they want. They keep plausible deniability for themselves. You can't see the puppet masters at work behind the scenes.

As plebs we see nothing but natural disasters and natural disease. It's not obvious that we should blame the billionaires at any given point. Who decides when where why and how we should go to war? Do normal people know that they only have a couple selfish psychopathic individuals to blame in reality?

They have been shown to cause "accidents" (oops a gas tanker blew up on top of the bridge in Detroit, now that real estate I wanted got a lot cheaper! thanks Ghislane!), start wildfires, and any number of insane murderous horrors to get their way. They want all these events that they've caused to look like mysterious natural disasters. I suspect that if there were no more billionaires suddenly, we'd see a lot less crazy shit happen in the world.

[–] datendefekt@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I don’t get the logic. Not criticizing you, because it’s one good explanation. Who generates the wealth for the billionaire class? Who receives the wealth? You’d want highly educated people and not peasants. Wouldn’t you rather grift in Taiwan than North Korea?

[–] Funwayguy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Corporations spent hundreds of billions on LLMs to crator the value of skilled labor, justify mass layoffs, and launder stolen content, all to cut cost. Whether it's legal regulations or basic human rights, in the eyes of sycophants, any perceived risk to their profit margin is deemed unacceptable including their own employees.

Smaller companies are themselves not meant to survive and intended to diversify legal risks and consequences (e.g. Alphabet and Meta split from Google and Facebook). This way they can be dismantled and sold once the legal baggage becomes unprofitable without risking the wealth that has long since been funnelled to its 'legally distinct' owners. The collateral damage to the now unemployed is simply one less thing off their balance sheet and is much easier to do when you have home turf legal ~~corruption~~ advantages.

So no, it's not about generating stable wealth long term as it is about capturing any source of capital by any means necessary, legality and morals be damned.

[–] pigup@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

In my mind, it doesn't really matter who generates the wealth. They already have it. They're just picking up the rest of the floor. And technically, I said, most of us. They want a small serving class. They will always need it. They take the path of least the resistance first. Take out all the lower hanging fruit.

[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Except that highly educated people are going to eventually fight back or flee grift and fascism. Only the dull , unskilled and propagandized will stick around until the leopards eat their faces.