this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2026
209 points (88.3% liked)

Fediverse memes

3418 readers
485 users here now

Memes about the Fediverse.

Rules

General
  1. Be respectful
  2. Post on topic
  3. No bigotry or hate speech
  4. Memes should not be personal attacks towards other users
  5. We are not YPTB. If you have a problem with the way an instance or community is run, then take it up over at !yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com.
    • Addendum: Yes we know that you think ml/hexbear/grad are tankies and or .world are a bunch of liberals but it gets old quickly. Try and come up with new material.
  6. This is not the place to start flamewars between Lemmy, Mbin and Piefed.

Elsewhere in the Fediverse

Other relevant communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ratio_Tile@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 94 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Goodbye Post

Looks like their Piefed instance incorporated a vote limit impacting a users ability to interact with their audience, and the holy one just threw up their hands at the thought of having to migrate due to instance dumbfuckery again.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 70 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What a weird policy decision. I don't think the Fediverse needs artificial scarcity or austerity.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 8 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I wouldn't agree with it but I see why they do it. If you listen to the instance operators and comm mods talk a big priority is they're trying not to just build another reddit. So occasionally instance devs get these ideas to try and deincentivise some of the toxic patterns reddit encouraged.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't understand. A vote limit? As in a user can't vote more than X amount of times per day or something? If so, how does that impact the ability to interact with their audience?

[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 35 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The holy one had many followers, and often had more than 250 people to bestow their blessed upvote upon. Pedantry should never get in the way of good works.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Oh it's the reverse??? A user cannot get more than X amount of votes? Dafak? Now that's crazy.

[–] Blaze@piefed.zip 4 points 7 hours ago

OP isn't correct in this case, I think it's to stay aligned with the tongue in cheek tone of the post.

The voting limit is for votes given, not received.

[–] Schmuppes@lemmy.today 3 points 8 hours ago

Have an upvote, just to test the limits of your instance.