this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2026
865 points (89.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41610 readers
3519 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] socsa@piefed.social 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but also not a big fan of oppressive religious dress codes.

[–] tmyakal@infosec.pub 41 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Good news: you don't have to ascribe to an oppressive religious dress code. The people that do want to dress in ways that conform to their religious and cultural beliefs can, and that continues to have fuck-all to do with you.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 18 points 2 days ago (7 children)

What about the ones who don't want to, but are forced into it?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

We should obviously ensure it's safe for them to leave such a situation and provide education on the resources available to anyone looking to flee a hostile domestic environment.

[–] manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What about people who want to be naked? Have you conisidered them, you chauvanist pig?

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That’s not okay, which is why where are not and should not be any laws in our country regarding what to wear, what to read, what you are allowed to do with your body (as long as it doesn’t violate someone else’s or force them into violent, gory, or sexual situations)

You hearing this, Christians? The USA isn’t here for you to make puritanical.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The men forcing women to dress like this aren't using the law to force them. Laws forbidding dressing like this are, theoretically, to protect them from being forced.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The treatment for this is not to outlaw the dress codes, rather to provide services that help people get away from abusive partners.

So the stuff that women have been fighting for since the late 20th century. Also the stuff white Christian nationalists want to eliminate:
~ DV Shelters
~ Property rights for women
~ Employment gender equity
~ No fault divorce
~ Crisis counseling

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 1 points 10 hours ago

I'm in favor of all that, too.

Plus, we all know that, whatever the theory, a lot of people just want to duck with Muslims.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

What about people pushing/forcing their partner into wearing more revealing clothes than they are comfortable in? Or just otherwise controlling it. Sure, abuse like that should be illegal (it often already is, although enforcement is usually terrible) and there needs to be support for people to get out of bad situations. But you'd never see those cases because they're not visibly other from you in the same way.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The ones forced into it, I pity. In my area, it's fairly common to see a women (and girls) out in the park in full religious garb, while their husband is in sweatpants and flip-flops. It definitely makes me angry. I honestly don't think anyone chooses to dress like this unless they are forced to by a man.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

In general I think we need to look to what feminists from similar cultural backgrounds to this say we should do and amplify their voices. I really don't want to get into a position where many of them see feminism as at odds with their culture, religion, and other beliefs. It's an ideology that must adapt to a culture in order to serve as a liberatory force within it

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 5 points 2 days ago

I see this sometimes from a distance, even with children. The boys are wild and loose, the girls on a tight leash.

Unfortunately, trying to address that with the sledgehammer of The State is not easy to do safely.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 1 points 2 days ago

I'm open to the probability that there are such women. But I can't imagine that they area anything but a sharp minority.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

They should have programs that support them and do outreach, not bans.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Unfortunately the people that don't want to conform to the dress code of their religion get beheaded.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago

Not so much in liberal democracies.

Sadly, the US is on its way toward becoming an autocratic religious state.

Or have their genitals mutilated