this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2026
686 points (98.6% liked)
Political Memes
12401 readers
4414 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
1) Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
2) No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
3) Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
4) No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
5) No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I was trying to figure out how to tackle your comment, and I'm going to start here. Where is the USA's core these days? What strategic savepoint is there to go back to to keep going? All of the people in the country aren't going to converge in the cities because the food/water would be strained far too much, they're not going out into the woods because most people don't have those skills anymore and there aren't enough woods anyway, so where do we all go? Company towns? Sharecropping what used to be your great grandfather's land for some corporation? Where?
We didn't stop growth. When real estate in congested parts of the country was all spoken for businesses started building up and high rise apartments became a thing and created a place for the economy to expand. The adoption of the internet created a place for the economy to expand. Even this latest LLM boom is creating a space for the economy to expand. Pretty soon all the data that can be gathered about people will have been gathered, and the expansion of the economy will occur in new ways of interpreting it.
The US will come back for whatever it's setting itself up for. We haven't even really tried voting in a new set of politicians. I do agree that our current policy of alienating ourselves, pissing off allies, not just ignoring or denying climate change but willfully accelerating it will cause it to take generations to stabilize, and that part is already baked in.
I don't want to see it fail or people to go through strife, but there's a significant enough subset of older people that raised families to act like families, but treated their own works like a business. Take note old people: nobody wants to buy your overpriced McMansion only to have to pay to have it torn down and rebuilt as something affordable to heat/cool any more than they want your collection of Franklin plates.
So what to do about the situation? It's pretty clear regulations and legislation to help aren't coming down the pipe. People aren't voting for change with any meaningful results, and the Democrat party isn't moving with the kind of speed necessary to stop the worst of it.
One thing I've noted is that when I think I have a good idea about something that might help is to do a little research; fairly often I discover that the idea was blocked by legislation years ago like I was in a chess match against a grandmaster that I didn't realize I was playing. Does that describe a little what you're talking about? I personally think we've all been maneuvered into these positions.
Remember. Our Constitution was designed by people who were already at the very top of the American social hierarchy at the time. The Founding Fathers were composed of an odd alliance of Northern merchants and media moguls and Southern plantation owners. These people fundamentally did not want society to change; they were already at the top of it. In their writings they were explicitly fearful of direct democracy, or "the mob" as they would have called it.
Our Constitution was deliberately designed to make using the federal government as a tool of profound social transformation extremely difficult. It has many anti-democratic mechanims built in.
It's just an incredibly brittle system that cannot meet the needs of the nation. Wealth inequality is out of control. Captured regulatory regimes both suppress new competition and under-regulate the national monopolies. I could go on all day. Our government is simply structurally incapable of meeting the needs of the nation.
And yes, you have the right idea. A lot of the paths to reform are cut off or captured by wealthy interests. The wealthy want many different things, but the one commonality that nearly all the super rich do not support is using the federal government as a tool of mass wealth redistribution.