this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2026
516 points (98.7% liked)

Climate

8925 readers
833 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/51623256

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Guys, if you're in "developed" countries and you're at least 1.5x above the poverty line, you're included in the global 10%. This smells like greenwashing the ultra-rich's effect, rather than showcasing it.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-025-02325-x

Top 1% is responsible for 20% of emissions and are 20x more responsible than the average person.

[–] DirtSona@feddit.org 2 points 20 hours ago

No. You are overestimating the income distribution in the world. The 10% worldwide threshold is a out 70k USD ppp, see: https://wid.world/world/#tptinc_p90p100_z/US;FR;DE;CN;ZA;GB;WO-PPP/last/us/k/p/yearly/t/false/0/200000/curve/false/country

2/3 of that would be 46k dollars. In which "developed" country in Europe would that be the poverty line? Poverty in German, iirc is around 20k euros.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This is a core component of the class war.

For all of history the ruling class have granted a minority of the proles a privileged life, who will play ball and defend their privileged position from the majority (uncle toms, lords, landowners, managers, lobbyists, politicians, even most CEO's).

Most of the richest 10-1% in the developing world earned their wealth through labor, and simply bought property or invested in retirement funds at the right time. They are still pawns, and not the ruling class decision makers — mostly born into so much wealth that they never had to work a day in their lives — who control corporations, political parties, military and geopolitical actions. They are the ones who own the media and propaganda machines, finance the class and culture wars, corrupt our political and democratic institutions, and have prevented our transition away from fossil fuels for 50+ years. Hell most of the 1-0.1% are not decision makers; probably successful doctors, lawyers, scientists, engineers, entertainers, etc.

[–] MalReynolds@piefed.social 1 points 20 hours ago

No war but class war...

[–] artifex@piefed.zip 6 points 1 day ago

This should have been the headline.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

Guys, if you’re in “developed” countries and you’re at least 1.5x above the poverty line, you’re included in the global 10%

17% of the global population lives in developed countries and there are plenty of rich people in developing countries too.

[–] Deme@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The so called middle class was created so that a portion of the working class would have enough wealth to consume products at a rate necessary to fuel the ongoing growth of the economy. In fulfilling this function (partly due to the influence of marketing propaganda), the middle class is also complicit. Not as complicit, but still.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Yes, very good. I think the people responsible for the decisions that lead us here should be held to account before those who passively participated, but I read you loud and clear.