this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2026
796 points (98.9% liked)

People Twitter

10426 readers
210 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. See stickied post https://web.archive.org/save is an option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
  7. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Oh you mean the question isn't just "how did they do that" but rather "how did they do that, that's impossible without CGI (which is a modern thing)". That... makes sense.

Edit: since this is apparently not entirely clear: everything inside quotation marks is a hypothetical quote, including everything inside parentheses.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The first use of CGI was in 1958…

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you think these hypothetical kids know that?

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don’t care about the hypothetical kids, I was responding to you who put ‘which is a modern thing’ in a parenthetical.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I was quoting the question that I assume the hypothetical kids were actually asking instead of "how did they do that". The whole scenario only makes sense to me if they think CGI didn't exist back then, in ye olden thymes, when The Princess Bride was made, and they can't fathom how anything was done without CGI.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The parentheses are just making that super confusing.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean, it's inside quotation marks, I don't know how else I'm meant to indicate that it's a quote. But alright, glad we cleared that up.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

Personally I would’ve just left the parentheses off if I was still speaking for the kids and not adding my own context. But indeed, I hope you have a good day!

[–] drcobaltjedi@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean, have you seen early CGI? A raspberry pi running blender can produce sharper CGI than any computer from the 50s. Sure it was impressive at the time but nothing even remotely passable today

[–] vrek@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

One thing to point out about that was the image quality itself. You could have a person "fly" by hanging by ropes but with the poor image quality at the time you couldn't see the ropes. On a 8k modern screen it would be incredibly obvious.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also worth noting that while home playback was possible it wasn’t really ubiquitous until the 70s and 80s, so most people only saw the film once or maybe twice before they’d have to wait for it to come to theaters again.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

True, i was a 80s baby so not sure on times before that