this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
164 points (94.6% liked)

Technology

87347 readers
1199 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] resterWink@lemmy.darkc0de.one -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You know, compiler based AI (not just LLMs) seem like an idea that might be pretty interesting. The option to disable or completely omit them from the toolchain would be mandatory however. But, even then we would have to consider how many pieces of software that then rely on this proverbial black box built into compilers would then get integrated into critical supply chain? We soon would have to start running behavior based "background checks" (just an analogy) on our software much like we do with people due to the unpredictability of such complexity.

Side note, I can't wait to see just how complex the field of game theory gets with AI. I would love to see any video essays on the topic if they do exist already.

๐Ÿง

[โ€“] shirro@aussie.zone 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Many projects require replicatable builds. Generative AI is driven by noise so I am not sure if it has any role in optimization or code gen. I guess we could share an RNG seed with source but honestly current tool chains are too slow as it is and ML would likely make it much worse. I want faster edit/compile/debug cycles and compilers already do insane optimisations. Ken Thompson's Reflections on Trusting Trust becomes much scarier if your code generation is being driven by a black box of billions or parameters nobody understands. An adversary could embed anything in there.

The machine translation origins of LLMs make them really good at inspecting text and looking for things that look like known bugs. It must be a game changer for security researchers who already know what sort of problems to look for but don't have enough hours in the day to find bugs reading source themselves. If some of that knowledge was available in a good quality FOSS local code analysis tool it might be irresponsible not to use it. We can't be dependent on commercial vendors and closed models.

I do wonder if Ai driven reverse engineering could have reproducible builds based on a similar principle so as to avoid needing to distribute any part of the original program